Influence of sub-specialty surgical care on outcomes for pediatric emergency general surgery patients in a low-middle income country

Adil A. Shah, Amarah Shakoor, Cheryl K. Zogg, Tolulope Oyetunji, Awais Ashfaq, Erin M. Garvey, Asad Latif, Robert Riviello, Faisal G. Qureshi, Arif Mateen, Adil H. Haider, Hasnain Zafar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Whether adult general surgeons should handle pediatric emergencies is controversial. In many resource-limited settings, pediatric surgeons are not available. The study examined differences in surgical outcomes among children/adolescents managed by pediatric and adult general surgery teams for emergency general surgical (EGS) conditions at a university-hospital in South Asia. Methods: Pediatric patients (<18y) admitted with an EGS diagnosis (March 2009-April 2014) were included. Patients were dichotomized by adult vs. pediatric surgical management team. Outcome measures included: length of stay (LOS), mortality, and occurrence of ≥1 complication(s). Descriptive statistics and multivariable regression analyses with propensity scores to account for potential confounding were used to compare outcomes between the two groups. Quasi-experimental counterfactual models further examined hypothetical outcomes, assuming that all patients had been treated by pediatric surgeons. Results: A total of 2323 patients were included. Average age was 7.1y (±5.5 SD); most patients were male (77.7%). 1958 (84.3%) were managed by pediatric surgery. The overall probability of developing a complication was 1.8%; 0.9% died (all adult general surgery). Patients managed by adult general surgery had higher risk-adjusted odds of developing complications (OR [95%CI]: 5.42 [2.10-14.00]) and longer average LOS (7.98 vs. 5.61 days, p < 0.01). 39.8% fewer complications and an 8.2% decrease in LOS would have been expected if all patients had been managed by pediatric surgery. Conclusion: Pediatric patients had better post-operative outcomes under pediatric surgical supervision, suggesting that, where possible in resource-constrained settings, resources should be allocated to promote development and staffing of pediatric surgical specialties parallel to adult general surgical teams.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)12-18
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Surgery
Volume29
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2016

Fingerprint

Surgical Specialties
Emergencies
Pediatrics
Length of Stay
Propensity Score
Theoretical Models

Keywords

  • Adult general surgery
  • Emergency general surgery
  • Low- and middle-income country
  • Pediatric surgery
  • Surgical outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Influence of sub-specialty surgical care on outcomes for pediatric emergency general surgery patients in a low-middle income country. / Shah, Adil A.; Shakoor, Amarah; Zogg, Cheryl K.; Oyetunji, Tolulope; Ashfaq, Awais; Garvey, Erin M.; Latif, Asad; Riviello, Robert; Qureshi, Faisal G.; Mateen, Arif; Haider, Adil H.; Zafar, Hasnain.

In: International Journal of Surgery, Vol. 29, 01.05.2016, p. 12-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shah, AA, Shakoor, A, Zogg, CK, Oyetunji, T, Ashfaq, A, Garvey, EM, Latif, A, Riviello, R, Qureshi, FG, Mateen, A, Haider, AH & Zafar, H 2016, 'Influence of sub-specialty surgical care on outcomes for pediatric emergency general surgery patients in a low-middle income country', International Journal of Surgery, vol. 29, pp. 12-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.03.007
Shah, Adil A. ; Shakoor, Amarah ; Zogg, Cheryl K. ; Oyetunji, Tolulope ; Ashfaq, Awais ; Garvey, Erin M. ; Latif, Asad ; Riviello, Robert ; Qureshi, Faisal G. ; Mateen, Arif ; Haider, Adil H. ; Zafar, Hasnain. / Influence of sub-specialty surgical care on outcomes for pediatric emergency general surgery patients in a low-middle income country. In: International Journal of Surgery. 2016 ; Vol. 29. pp. 12-18.
@article{b0bbc112d2574b05957fefd5747da00e,
title = "Influence of sub-specialty surgical care on outcomes for pediatric emergency general surgery patients in a low-middle income country",
abstract = "Background: Whether adult general surgeons should handle pediatric emergencies is controversial. In many resource-limited settings, pediatric surgeons are not available. The study examined differences in surgical outcomes among children/adolescents managed by pediatric and adult general surgery teams for emergency general surgical (EGS) conditions at a university-hospital in South Asia. Methods: Pediatric patients (<18y) admitted with an EGS diagnosis (March 2009-April 2014) were included. Patients were dichotomized by adult vs. pediatric surgical management team. Outcome measures included: length of stay (LOS), mortality, and occurrence of ≥1 complication(s). Descriptive statistics and multivariable regression analyses with propensity scores to account for potential confounding were used to compare outcomes between the two groups. Quasi-experimental counterfactual models further examined hypothetical outcomes, assuming that all patients had been treated by pediatric surgeons. Results: A total of 2323 patients were included. Average age was 7.1y (±5.5 SD); most patients were male (77.7{\%}). 1958 (84.3{\%}) were managed by pediatric surgery. The overall probability of developing a complication was 1.8{\%}; 0.9{\%} died (all adult general surgery). Patients managed by adult general surgery had higher risk-adjusted odds of developing complications (OR [95{\%}CI]: 5.42 [2.10-14.00]) and longer average LOS (7.98 vs. 5.61 days, p < 0.01). 39.8{\%} fewer complications and an 8.2{\%} decrease in LOS would have been expected if all patients had been managed by pediatric surgery. Conclusion: Pediatric patients had better post-operative outcomes under pediatric surgical supervision, suggesting that, where possible in resource-constrained settings, resources should be allocated to promote development and staffing of pediatric surgical specialties parallel to adult general surgical teams.",
keywords = "Adult general surgery, Emergency general surgery, Low- and middle-income country, Pediatric surgery, Surgical outcomes",
author = "Shah, {Adil A.} and Amarah Shakoor and Zogg, {Cheryl K.} and Tolulope Oyetunji and Awais Ashfaq and Garvey, {Erin M.} and Asad Latif and Robert Riviello and Qureshi, {Faisal G.} and Arif Mateen and Haider, {Adil H.} and Hasnain Zafar",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.03.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "12--18",
journal = "International Journal of Surgery",
issn = "1743-9191",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of sub-specialty surgical care on outcomes for pediatric emergency general surgery patients in a low-middle income country

AU - Shah, Adil A.

AU - Shakoor, Amarah

AU - Zogg, Cheryl K.

AU - Oyetunji, Tolulope

AU - Ashfaq, Awais

AU - Garvey, Erin M.

AU - Latif, Asad

AU - Riviello, Robert

AU - Qureshi, Faisal G.

AU - Mateen, Arif

AU - Haider, Adil H.

AU - Zafar, Hasnain

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

N2 - Background: Whether adult general surgeons should handle pediatric emergencies is controversial. In many resource-limited settings, pediatric surgeons are not available. The study examined differences in surgical outcomes among children/adolescents managed by pediatric and adult general surgery teams for emergency general surgical (EGS) conditions at a university-hospital in South Asia. Methods: Pediatric patients (<18y) admitted with an EGS diagnosis (March 2009-April 2014) were included. Patients were dichotomized by adult vs. pediatric surgical management team. Outcome measures included: length of stay (LOS), mortality, and occurrence of ≥1 complication(s). Descriptive statistics and multivariable regression analyses with propensity scores to account for potential confounding were used to compare outcomes between the two groups. Quasi-experimental counterfactual models further examined hypothetical outcomes, assuming that all patients had been treated by pediatric surgeons. Results: A total of 2323 patients were included. Average age was 7.1y (±5.5 SD); most patients were male (77.7%). 1958 (84.3%) were managed by pediatric surgery. The overall probability of developing a complication was 1.8%; 0.9% died (all adult general surgery). Patients managed by adult general surgery had higher risk-adjusted odds of developing complications (OR [95%CI]: 5.42 [2.10-14.00]) and longer average LOS (7.98 vs. 5.61 days, p < 0.01). 39.8% fewer complications and an 8.2% decrease in LOS would have been expected if all patients had been managed by pediatric surgery. Conclusion: Pediatric patients had better post-operative outcomes under pediatric surgical supervision, suggesting that, where possible in resource-constrained settings, resources should be allocated to promote development and staffing of pediatric surgical specialties parallel to adult general surgical teams.

AB - Background: Whether adult general surgeons should handle pediatric emergencies is controversial. In many resource-limited settings, pediatric surgeons are not available. The study examined differences in surgical outcomes among children/adolescents managed by pediatric and adult general surgery teams for emergency general surgical (EGS) conditions at a university-hospital in South Asia. Methods: Pediatric patients (<18y) admitted with an EGS diagnosis (March 2009-April 2014) were included. Patients were dichotomized by adult vs. pediatric surgical management team. Outcome measures included: length of stay (LOS), mortality, and occurrence of ≥1 complication(s). Descriptive statistics and multivariable regression analyses with propensity scores to account for potential confounding were used to compare outcomes between the two groups. Quasi-experimental counterfactual models further examined hypothetical outcomes, assuming that all patients had been treated by pediatric surgeons. Results: A total of 2323 patients were included. Average age was 7.1y (±5.5 SD); most patients were male (77.7%). 1958 (84.3%) were managed by pediatric surgery. The overall probability of developing a complication was 1.8%; 0.9% died (all adult general surgery). Patients managed by adult general surgery had higher risk-adjusted odds of developing complications (OR [95%CI]: 5.42 [2.10-14.00]) and longer average LOS (7.98 vs. 5.61 days, p < 0.01). 39.8% fewer complications and an 8.2% decrease in LOS would have been expected if all patients had been managed by pediatric surgery. Conclusion: Pediatric patients had better post-operative outcomes under pediatric surgical supervision, suggesting that, where possible in resource-constrained settings, resources should be allocated to promote development and staffing of pediatric surgical specialties parallel to adult general surgical teams.

KW - Adult general surgery

KW - Emergency general surgery

KW - Low- and middle-income country

KW - Pediatric surgery

KW - Surgical outcomes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961279449&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961279449&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.03.007

DO - 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.03.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 26971828

AN - SCOPUS:84961279449

VL - 29

SP - 12

EP - 18

JO - International Journal of Surgery

JF - International Journal of Surgery

SN - 1743-9191

ER -