Initial results for combined orchiectomy and prosthesis exchange for unsalvageable testicular torsion in adolescents: Description of intravaginal prosthesis placement at orchiectomy

Nicol Corbin Bush, Aditya Bagrodia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Historically the placement of testicular prosthesis during orchiectomy for torsion is delayed despite reports of safe prosthesis placement during mastectomy and orchiectomy for cancer as well as the removal of infected penile prostheses. We describe our experience with intravaginal testicular prosthesis at orchiectomy in adolescents with torsion. Materials and Methods: Consecutive pubertal patients undergoing exploration for torsion from 2010 to 2011 were offered orchiectomy with staged prosthesis or combined orchiectomy and prosthesis exchange for nonsalvageable testis. Through a midline scrotal incision the ipsilateral tunica vaginalis was opened, testis detorsed and contralateral orchiopexy performed. When verified as unviable, the ipsilateral spermatic cord was suture ligated within the tunica vaginalis and preplaced sutures secured the saline filled prosthesis in the tunica vaginalis. Patients were discharged home on the day of surgery with 5 days of oral antibiotics and narcotics. Demographic, surgical and postoperative measures were prospectively recorded. Results: Of 19 patients 6 had testes deemed salvageable at surgery with a median time to presentation of 6 hours (range 4 to 48) vs 96 (range 14 to 168, p = 0.002) in the 13 patients with nonsalvageable torsion. Of these patients 12 (median age 15 years, range 12 to 16) elected combined orchiectomy and prosthesis exchange. With a median followup of 4.8 months (range 1.5 to 16) there were no infectious complications or extrusions. Eleven (91.7%) patients had a symmetric appearing scrotum with the prosthesis located in a mid to dependent scrotal position. Conclusions: We demonstrate the feasibility of intravaginal prosthesis placement for immediate scrotal reconstruction in adolescents with nonsalvageable testicular torsion. Advantages of combined orchiectomy and prosthesis exchange include orthotopic prosthetic position, extra tunica vaginalis barrier layer and avoidance of a second anesthetic.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1424-1428
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume188
Issue number4 SUPPL.
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2012

Fingerprint

Spermatic Cord Torsion
Orchiectomy
Prostheses and Implants
Testis
Sutures
Penile Prosthesis
Orchiopexy
Spermatic Cord
Scrotum
Mastectomy
Narcotics
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
Anesthetics
Demography

Keywords

  • prostheses and implants
  • spermatic cord torsion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

@article{fc27268593c846e8af43fe147ea3b36b,
title = "Initial results for combined orchiectomy and prosthesis exchange for unsalvageable testicular torsion in adolescents: Description of intravaginal prosthesis placement at orchiectomy",
abstract = "Purpose: Historically the placement of testicular prosthesis during orchiectomy for torsion is delayed despite reports of safe prosthesis placement during mastectomy and orchiectomy for cancer as well as the removal of infected penile prostheses. We describe our experience with intravaginal testicular prosthesis at orchiectomy in adolescents with torsion. Materials and Methods: Consecutive pubertal patients undergoing exploration for torsion from 2010 to 2011 were offered orchiectomy with staged prosthesis or combined orchiectomy and prosthesis exchange for nonsalvageable testis. Through a midline scrotal incision the ipsilateral tunica vaginalis was opened, testis detorsed and contralateral orchiopexy performed. When verified as unviable, the ipsilateral spermatic cord was suture ligated within the tunica vaginalis and preplaced sutures secured the saline filled prosthesis in the tunica vaginalis. Patients were discharged home on the day of surgery with 5 days of oral antibiotics and narcotics. Demographic, surgical and postoperative measures were prospectively recorded. Results: Of 19 patients 6 had testes deemed salvageable at surgery with a median time to presentation of 6 hours (range 4 to 48) vs 96 (range 14 to 168, p = 0.002) in the 13 patients with nonsalvageable torsion. Of these patients 12 (median age 15 years, range 12 to 16) elected combined orchiectomy and prosthesis exchange. With a median followup of 4.8 months (range 1.5 to 16) there were no infectious complications or extrusions. Eleven (91.7{\%}) patients had a symmetric appearing scrotum with the prosthesis located in a mid to dependent scrotal position. Conclusions: We demonstrate the feasibility of intravaginal prosthesis placement for immediate scrotal reconstruction in adolescents with nonsalvageable testicular torsion. Advantages of combined orchiectomy and prosthesis exchange include orthotopic prosthetic position, extra tunica vaginalis barrier layer and avoidance of a second anesthetic.",
keywords = "prostheses and implants, spermatic cord torsion",
author = "Bush, {Nicol Corbin} and Aditya Bagrodia",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.030",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "188",
pages = "1424--1428",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4 SUPPL.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Initial results for combined orchiectomy and prosthesis exchange for unsalvageable testicular torsion in adolescents

T2 - Description of intravaginal prosthesis placement at orchiectomy

AU - Bush, Nicol Corbin

AU - Bagrodia, Aditya

PY - 2012/10/1

Y1 - 2012/10/1

N2 - Purpose: Historically the placement of testicular prosthesis during orchiectomy for torsion is delayed despite reports of safe prosthesis placement during mastectomy and orchiectomy for cancer as well as the removal of infected penile prostheses. We describe our experience with intravaginal testicular prosthesis at orchiectomy in adolescents with torsion. Materials and Methods: Consecutive pubertal patients undergoing exploration for torsion from 2010 to 2011 were offered orchiectomy with staged prosthesis or combined orchiectomy and prosthesis exchange for nonsalvageable testis. Through a midline scrotal incision the ipsilateral tunica vaginalis was opened, testis detorsed and contralateral orchiopexy performed. When verified as unviable, the ipsilateral spermatic cord was suture ligated within the tunica vaginalis and preplaced sutures secured the saline filled prosthesis in the tunica vaginalis. Patients were discharged home on the day of surgery with 5 days of oral antibiotics and narcotics. Demographic, surgical and postoperative measures were prospectively recorded. Results: Of 19 patients 6 had testes deemed salvageable at surgery with a median time to presentation of 6 hours (range 4 to 48) vs 96 (range 14 to 168, p = 0.002) in the 13 patients with nonsalvageable torsion. Of these patients 12 (median age 15 years, range 12 to 16) elected combined orchiectomy and prosthesis exchange. With a median followup of 4.8 months (range 1.5 to 16) there were no infectious complications or extrusions. Eleven (91.7%) patients had a symmetric appearing scrotum with the prosthesis located in a mid to dependent scrotal position. Conclusions: We demonstrate the feasibility of intravaginal prosthesis placement for immediate scrotal reconstruction in adolescents with nonsalvageable testicular torsion. Advantages of combined orchiectomy and prosthesis exchange include orthotopic prosthetic position, extra tunica vaginalis barrier layer and avoidance of a second anesthetic.

AB - Purpose: Historically the placement of testicular prosthesis during orchiectomy for torsion is delayed despite reports of safe prosthesis placement during mastectomy and orchiectomy for cancer as well as the removal of infected penile prostheses. We describe our experience with intravaginal testicular prosthesis at orchiectomy in adolescents with torsion. Materials and Methods: Consecutive pubertal patients undergoing exploration for torsion from 2010 to 2011 were offered orchiectomy with staged prosthesis or combined orchiectomy and prosthesis exchange for nonsalvageable testis. Through a midline scrotal incision the ipsilateral tunica vaginalis was opened, testis detorsed and contralateral orchiopexy performed. When verified as unviable, the ipsilateral spermatic cord was suture ligated within the tunica vaginalis and preplaced sutures secured the saline filled prosthesis in the tunica vaginalis. Patients were discharged home on the day of surgery with 5 days of oral antibiotics and narcotics. Demographic, surgical and postoperative measures were prospectively recorded. Results: Of 19 patients 6 had testes deemed salvageable at surgery with a median time to presentation of 6 hours (range 4 to 48) vs 96 (range 14 to 168, p = 0.002) in the 13 patients with nonsalvageable torsion. Of these patients 12 (median age 15 years, range 12 to 16) elected combined orchiectomy and prosthesis exchange. With a median followup of 4.8 months (range 1.5 to 16) there were no infectious complications or extrusions. Eleven (91.7%) patients had a symmetric appearing scrotum with the prosthesis located in a mid to dependent scrotal position. Conclusions: We demonstrate the feasibility of intravaginal prosthesis placement for immediate scrotal reconstruction in adolescents with nonsalvageable testicular torsion. Advantages of combined orchiectomy and prosthesis exchange include orthotopic prosthetic position, extra tunica vaginalis barrier layer and avoidance of a second anesthetic.

KW - prostheses and implants

KW - spermatic cord torsion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866065193&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866065193&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.030

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.030

M3 - Article

C2 - 22906659

AN - SCOPUS:84866065193

VL - 188

SP - 1424

EP - 1428

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 4 SUPPL.

ER -