Innovation in Residency Selection: The AAMC Standardized Video Interview

Steven B. Bird, H. Gene Hern, Andra Blomkalns, Nicole M. Deiorio, Yolanda Haywood, Katherine M. Hiller, Dana Dunleavy, Keith Dowd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE: Innovative tools are needed to shift residency selection toward a more holistic process that balances academic achievement with other competencies important for success in residency. The authors evaluated the feasibility of the AAMC Standardized Video Interview (SVI) and evidence of the validity of SVI total scores. METHOD: The SVI, developed by the Association of American Medical Colleges, consists of six questions designed to assess applicants' interpersonal and communication skills and knowledge of professionalism. Study 1 was conducted in 2016 for research purposes. Study 2 was an operational pilot administration in 2017; SVI data were available for use in residency selection by emergency medicine programs for the 2018 application cycle. Descriptive statistics, correlations, and standardized mean differences were used to examine data. RESULTS: Study 1 included 855 applicants; Study 2 included 3,532 applicants. SVI total scores were relatively normally distributed. There were small correlations between SVI total scores and United States Medical Licensing Examination Step exam scores, Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society membership, and Gold Humanism Honor Society membership. There were no-to-small group differences in SVI total scores by gender and race/ethnicity, and small-to-medium differences by applicant type. CONCLUSIONS: Findings provide initial evidence of the validity of SVI total scores and suggest that these scores provide different information than academic metrics. Use of the SVI, as part of a holistic screening process, may help program directors widen the pool of applicants invited to in-person interviews and may signal that programs value interpersonal and communication skills and professionalism.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1489-1497
Number of pages9
JournalAcademic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
Volume94
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2019

Fingerprint

video
innovation
interview
applicant
communication skills
honor
Marburger Bund
humanism
descriptive statistics
gold
academic achievement
small group
evidence
director
ethnicity
medicine
examination
human being
gender
Values

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Bird, S. B., Hern, H. G., Blomkalns, A., Deiorio, N. M., Haywood, Y., Hiller, K. M., ... Dowd, K. (2019). Innovation in Residency Selection: The AAMC Standardized Video Interview. Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 94(10), 1489-1497. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002705

Innovation in Residency Selection : The AAMC Standardized Video Interview. / Bird, Steven B.; Hern, H. Gene; Blomkalns, Andra; Deiorio, Nicole M.; Haywood, Yolanda; Hiller, Katherine M.; Dunleavy, Dana; Dowd, Keith.

In: Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, Vol. 94, No. 10, 01.10.2019, p. 1489-1497.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bird, SB, Hern, HG, Blomkalns, A, Deiorio, NM, Haywood, Y, Hiller, KM, Dunleavy, D & Dowd, K 2019, 'Innovation in Residency Selection: The AAMC Standardized Video Interview', Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, vol. 94, no. 10, pp. 1489-1497. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002705
Bird, Steven B. ; Hern, H. Gene ; Blomkalns, Andra ; Deiorio, Nicole M. ; Haywood, Yolanda ; Hiller, Katherine M. ; Dunleavy, Dana ; Dowd, Keith. / Innovation in Residency Selection : The AAMC Standardized Video Interview. In: Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 2019 ; Vol. 94, No. 10. pp. 1489-1497.
@article{9a52f837849d444caf89d426e91c3a00,
title = "Innovation in Residency Selection: The AAMC Standardized Video Interview",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Innovative tools are needed to shift residency selection toward a more holistic process that balances academic achievement with other competencies important for success in residency. The authors evaluated the feasibility of the AAMC Standardized Video Interview (SVI) and evidence of the validity of SVI total scores. METHOD: The SVI, developed by the Association of American Medical Colleges, consists of six questions designed to assess applicants' interpersonal and communication skills and knowledge of professionalism. Study 1 was conducted in 2016 for research purposes. Study 2 was an operational pilot administration in 2017; SVI data were available for use in residency selection by emergency medicine programs for the 2018 application cycle. Descriptive statistics, correlations, and standardized mean differences were used to examine data. RESULTS: Study 1 included 855 applicants; Study 2 included 3,532 applicants. SVI total scores were relatively normally distributed. There were small correlations between SVI total scores and United States Medical Licensing Examination Step exam scores, Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society membership, and Gold Humanism Honor Society membership. There were no-to-small group differences in SVI total scores by gender and race/ethnicity, and small-to-medium differences by applicant type. CONCLUSIONS: Findings provide initial evidence of the validity of SVI total scores and suggest that these scores provide different information than academic metrics. Use of the SVI, as part of a holistic screening process, may help program directors widen the pool of applicants invited to in-person interviews and may signal that programs value interpersonal and communication skills and professionalism.",
author = "Bird, {Steven B.} and Hern, {H. Gene} and Andra Blomkalns and Deiorio, {Nicole M.} and Yolanda Haywood and Hiller, {Katherine M.} and Dana Dunleavy and Keith Dowd",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0000000000002705",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "94",
pages = "1489--1497",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Innovation in Residency Selection

T2 - The AAMC Standardized Video Interview

AU - Bird, Steven B.

AU - Hern, H. Gene

AU - Blomkalns, Andra

AU - Deiorio, Nicole M.

AU - Haywood, Yolanda

AU - Hiller, Katherine M.

AU - Dunleavy, Dana

AU - Dowd, Keith

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - PURPOSE: Innovative tools are needed to shift residency selection toward a more holistic process that balances academic achievement with other competencies important for success in residency. The authors evaluated the feasibility of the AAMC Standardized Video Interview (SVI) and evidence of the validity of SVI total scores. METHOD: The SVI, developed by the Association of American Medical Colleges, consists of six questions designed to assess applicants' interpersonal and communication skills and knowledge of professionalism. Study 1 was conducted in 2016 for research purposes. Study 2 was an operational pilot administration in 2017; SVI data were available for use in residency selection by emergency medicine programs for the 2018 application cycle. Descriptive statistics, correlations, and standardized mean differences were used to examine data. RESULTS: Study 1 included 855 applicants; Study 2 included 3,532 applicants. SVI total scores were relatively normally distributed. There were small correlations between SVI total scores and United States Medical Licensing Examination Step exam scores, Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society membership, and Gold Humanism Honor Society membership. There were no-to-small group differences in SVI total scores by gender and race/ethnicity, and small-to-medium differences by applicant type. CONCLUSIONS: Findings provide initial evidence of the validity of SVI total scores and suggest that these scores provide different information than academic metrics. Use of the SVI, as part of a holistic screening process, may help program directors widen the pool of applicants invited to in-person interviews and may signal that programs value interpersonal and communication skills and professionalism.

AB - PURPOSE: Innovative tools are needed to shift residency selection toward a more holistic process that balances academic achievement with other competencies important for success in residency. The authors evaluated the feasibility of the AAMC Standardized Video Interview (SVI) and evidence of the validity of SVI total scores. METHOD: The SVI, developed by the Association of American Medical Colleges, consists of six questions designed to assess applicants' interpersonal and communication skills and knowledge of professionalism. Study 1 was conducted in 2016 for research purposes. Study 2 was an operational pilot administration in 2017; SVI data were available for use in residency selection by emergency medicine programs for the 2018 application cycle. Descriptive statistics, correlations, and standardized mean differences were used to examine data. RESULTS: Study 1 included 855 applicants; Study 2 included 3,532 applicants. SVI total scores were relatively normally distributed. There were small correlations between SVI total scores and United States Medical Licensing Examination Step exam scores, Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society membership, and Gold Humanism Honor Society membership. There were no-to-small group differences in SVI total scores by gender and race/ethnicity, and small-to-medium differences by applicant type. CONCLUSIONS: Findings provide initial evidence of the validity of SVI total scores and suggest that these scores provide different information than academic metrics. Use of the SVI, as part of a holistic screening process, may help program directors widen the pool of applicants invited to in-person interviews and may signal that programs value interpersonal and communication skills and professionalism.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072745639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072745639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002705

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002705

M3 - Article

C2 - 30870151

AN - SCOPUS:85072745639

VL - 94

SP - 1489

EP - 1497

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 10

ER -