Innovative health reform models: pay-for-performance initiatives.

Seth W. Glickman, Eric D. Peterson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Pay-for-performance (P4P) programs have the potential to improve overall quality of care by narrowing gaps between what national care guidelines recommend and those treatments actually delivered in routine community practice. P4P is also viewed as a tool to promote more efficient use of healthcare resources while improving patient outcomes. P4P provides financial incentives for quality of service instead of quantity of service. Despite the promise of healthcare quality, concerns have been raised that P4P may have potential unintended consequences for patients, physicians, and hospitals. The shortcomings of many traditional P4P programs have fueled the emergence of new and innovative models of payment reform. P4P and newer models that link reimbursement with quality and efficiency show promise to improve patient outcomes and lower costs, but multiple approaches are needed to ensure that future initiatives provide value for key stakeholders, including patients, providers, and payers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S300-305
JournalThe American journal of managed care
Volume15
Issue number10 Suppl
StatePublished - Dec 2009
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Innovative health reform models: pay-for-performance initiatives.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this