Interpretation of digital screening mammography

Tamara Miner Haygood, Basak E. Dogan

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Digital and film-screen screening mammography are fairly similar in their ability to detect cancer. Depending on which paper one is reading, this might be measured by sensitivity and specificity or by comparing other measures including cancer detection rate, recall rate, and positive predictive value. Because it is not the mammogram itself that may exhibit a certain accuracy but rather the radiologist interpreting the mammogram, it follows that radiologists’ interpretation of digital screening mammograms is similar in accuracy to their interpretation of film-screen screening mammograms. There are, however, differences in the approach that may be taken. These are addressed here, and we will provide some suggestions. Digital mammograms may be of two types, either computed radiography (CR) or digital radiography (DR). To make it more interesting, digital mammograms may be printed on film for interpretation or interpreted using soft copy on a computer monitor. Film-screen mammograms are normally interpreted on film, but they can be digitized and viewed on a computer screen, usually to serve as a comparison study to a mammogram that will be interpreted on the computer. The main focus of this chapter will be interpretation of DR-type digital mammograms on computer monitors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationDigital Mammography
Subtitle of host publicationA Practical Approach
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages46-61
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9781139049337
ISBN (Print)9780521763721
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

Fingerprint

Mammography
Motion Pictures
Radiographic Image Enhancement
Radiography
Reading
Neoplasms
Sensitivity and Specificity
Radiologists

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Haygood, T. M., & Dogan, B. E. (2009). Interpretation of digital screening mammography. In Digital Mammography: A Practical Approach (pp. 46-61). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139049337.007

Interpretation of digital screening mammography. / Haygood, Tamara Miner; Dogan, Basak E.

Digital Mammography: A Practical Approach. Cambridge University Press, 2009. p. 46-61.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Haygood, TM & Dogan, BE 2009, Interpretation of digital screening mammography. in Digital Mammography: A Practical Approach. Cambridge University Press, pp. 46-61. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139049337.007
Haygood TM, Dogan BE. Interpretation of digital screening mammography. In Digital Mammography: A Practical Approach. Cambridge University Press. 2009. p. 46-61 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139049337.007
Haygood, Tamara Miner ; Dogan, Basak E. / Interpretation of digital screening mammography. Digital Mammography: A Practical Approach. Cambridge University Press, 2009. pp. 46-61
@inbook{928ef6e49c564ac986d8dcdb9da8ace8,
title = "Interpretation of digital screening mammography",
abstract = "Digital and film-screen screening mammography are fairly similar in their ability to detect cancer. Depending on which paper one is reading, this might be measured by sensitivity and specificity or by comparing other measures including cancer detection rate, recall rate, and positive predictive value. Because it is not the mammogram itself that may exhibit a certain accuracy but rather the radiologist interpreting the mammogram, it follows that radiologists’ interpretation of digital screening mammograms is similar in accuracy to their interpretation of film-screen screening mammograms. There are, however, differences in the approach that may be taken. These are addressed here, and we will provide some suggestions. Digital mammograms may be of two types, either computed radiography (CR) or digital radiography (DR). To make it more interesting, digital mammograms may be printed on film for interpretation or interpreted using soft copy on a computer monitor. Film-screen mammograms are normally interpreted on film, but they can be digitized and viewed on a computer screen, usually to serve as a comparison study to a mammogram that will be interpreted on the computer. The main focus of this chapter will be interpretation of DR-type digital mammograms on computer monitors.",
author = "Haygood, {Tamara Miner} and Dogan, {Basak E.}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9781139049337.007",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780521763721",
pages = "46--61",
booktitle = "Digital Mammography",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Interpretation of digital screening mammography

AU - Haygood, Tamara Miner

AU - Dogan, Basak E.

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - Digital and film-screen screening mammography are fairly similar in their ability to detect cancer. Depending on which paper one is reading, this might be measured by sensitivity and specificity or by comparing other measures including cancer detection rate, recall rate, and positive predictive value. Because it is not the mammogram itself that may exhibit a certain accuracy but rather the radiologist interpreting the mammogram, it follows that radiologists’ interpretation of digital screening mammograms is similar in accuracy to their interpretation of film-screen screening mammograms. There are, however, differences in the approach that may be taken. These are addressed here, and we will provide some suggestions. Digital mammograms may be of two types, either computed radiography (CR) or digital radiography (DR). To make it more interesting, digital mammograms may be printed on film for interpretation or interpreted using soft copy on a computer monitor. Film-screen mammograms are normally interpreted on film, but they can be digitized and viewed on a computer screen, usually to serve as a comparison study to a mammogram that will be interpreted on the computer. The main focus of this chapter will be interpretation of DR-type digital mammograms on computer monitors.

AB - Digital and film-screen screening mammography are fairly similar in their ability to detect cancer. Depending on which paper one is reading, this might be measured by sensitivity and specificity or by comparing other measures including cancer detection rate, recall rate, and positive predictive value. Because it is not the mammogram itself that may exhibit a certain accuracy but rather the radiologist interpreting the mammogram, it follows that radiologists’ interpretation of digital screening mammograms is similar in accuracy to their interpretation of film-screen screening mammograms. There are, however, differences in the approach that may be taken. These are addressed here, and we will provide some suggestions. Digital mammograms may be of two types, either computed radiography (CR) or digital radiography (DR). To make it more interesting, digital mammograms may be printed on film for interpretation or interpreted using soft copy on a computer monitor. Film-screen mammograms are normally interpreted on film, but they can be digitized and viewed on a computer screen, usually to serve as a comparison study to a mammogram that will be interpreted on the computer. The main focus of this chapter will be interpretation of DR-type digital mammograms on computer monitors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928060048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928060048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9781139049337.007

DO - 10.1017/CBO9781139049337.007

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84928060048

SN - 9780521763721

SP - 46

EP - 61

BT - Digital Mammography

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -