Interrater and intrarater reliability in the measurement of ankle joint dorsiflexion is independent of examiner experience and technique used

Paul Jeong Kim, Ruth Peace, Jamie Mieras, Tanya Thoms, Denise Freeman, Jeffrey Page

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Goniometric measurement is currently being used as a diagnostic and outcomes assessment tool for ankle joint dorsiflexion. Despite its common use, its interrater and intrarater reliability has been questioned. Methods: This is a prospective study examining whether the experience of the examiner or the technique used affects the interrater and intrarater reliability for measuring ankle joint dorsiflexion. Fourteen asymptomatic individuals (8 male and 6 female) with a mean age of 28.2 years (range, 23-52) were enrolled into this study. The years of clinical experience of the five examiners averaged 10.4 years (range, 0-26). Four examiners used a modified Root, Weed and Orien method of measuring ankle joint dorsiflexion. The fifth examiner utilized a nonstandardized technique. A standard goniometer was used for bilateral measurements of ankle joint dorsiflexion with the knee extended and flexed. All five examiners repeated each measurement three times during each of the three sessions, with each session spaced at least 1 week apart. Results: The interclass correlation coefficient reveals a moderate intrarater and poor interrater reliability in ankle joint dorsiflexion measurements using a standard goniometer. More importantly, further analysis indicates that the use of a standardized technique for measurement of ankle joint dorsiflexion or years of clinical experience does not increase the intrarater or interrater reliability. Conclusions: The utility of the goniometric measurement of ankle joint dorsiflexion may be limited.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)407-414
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American Podiatric Medical Association
Volume101
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ankle Joint
Knee
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Prospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Podiatry
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Interrater and intrarater reliability in the measurement of ankle joint dorsiflexion is independent of examiner experience and technique used. / Kim, Paul Jeong; Peace, Ruth; Mieras, Jamie; Thoms, Tanya; Freeman, Denise; Page, Jeffrey.

In: Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, Vol. 101, No. 5, 01.01.2011, p. 407-414.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{30f08ae9e7104226832a92555cd2135e,
title = "Interrater and intrarater reliability in the measurement of ankle joint dorsiflexion is independent of examiner experience and technique used",
abstract = "Background: Goniometric measurement is currently being used as a diagnostic and outcomes assessment tool for ankle joint dorsiflexion. Despite its common use, its interrater and intrarater reliability has been questioned. Methods: This is a prospective study examining whether the experience of the examiner or the technique used affects the interrater and intrarater reliability for measuring ankle joint dorsiflexion. Fourteen asymptomatic individuals (8 male and 6 female) with a mean age of 28.2 years (range, 23-52) were enrolled into this study. The years of clinical experience of the five examiners averaged 10.4 years (range, 0-26). Four examiners used a modified Root, Weed and Orien method of measuring ankle joint dorsiflexion. The fifth examiner utilized a nonstandardized technique. A standard goniometer was used for bilateral measurements of ankle joint dorsiflexion with the knee extended and flexed. All five examiners repeated each measurement three times during each of the three sessions, with each session spaced at least 1 week apart. Results: The interclass correlation coefficient reveals a moderate intrarater and poor interrater reliability in ankle joint dorsiflexion measurements using a standard goniometer. More importantly, further analysis indicates that the use of a standardized technique for measurement of ankle joint dorsiflexion or years of clinical experience does not increase the intrarater or interrater reliability. Conclusions: The utility of the goniometric measurement of ankle joint dorsiflexion may be limited.",
author = "Kim, {Paul Jeong} and Ruth Peace and Jamie Mieras and Tanya Thoms and Denise Freeman and Jeffrey Page",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.7547/1010407",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "101",
pages = "407--414",
journal = "Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association",
issn = "8750-7315",
publisher = "American Podiatric Medical Association",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interrater and intrarater reliability in the measurement of ankle joint dorsiflexion is independent of examiner experience and technique used

AU - Kim, Paul Jeong

AU - Peace, Ruth

AU - Mieras, Jamie

AU - Thoms, Tanya

AU - Freeman, Denise

AU - Page, Jeffrey

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Background: Goniometric measurement is currently being used as a diagnostic and outcomes assessment tool for ankle joint dorsiflexion. Despite its common use, its interrater and intrarater reliability has been questioned. Methods: This is a prospective study examining whether the experience of the examiner or the technique used affects the interrater and intrarater reliability for measuring ankle joint dorsiflexion. Fourteen asymptomatic individuals (8 male and 6 female) with a mean age of 28.2 years (range, 23-52) were enrolled into this study. The years of clinical experience of the five examiners averaged 10.4 years (range, 0-26). Four examiners used a modified Root, Weed and Orien method of measuring ankle joint dorsiflexion. The fifth examiner utilized a nonstandardized technique. A standard goniometer was used for bilateral measurements of ankle joint dorsiflexion with the knee extended and flexed. All five examiners repeated each measurement three times during each of the three sessions, with each session spaced at least 1 week apart. Results: The interclass correlation coefficient reveals a moderate intrarater and poor interrater reliability in ankle joint dorsiflexion measurements using a standard goniometer. More importantly, further analysis indicates that the use of a standardized technique for measurement of ankle joint dorsiflexion or years of clinical experience does not increase the intrarater or interrater reliability. Conclusions: The utility of the goniometric measurement of ankle joint dorsiflexion may be limited.

AB - Background: Goniometric measurement is currently being used as a diagnostic and outcomes assessment tool for ankle joint dorsiflexion. Despite its common use, its interrater and intrarater reliability has been questioned. Methods: This is a prospective study examining whether the experience of the examiner or the technique used affects the interrater and intrarater reliability for measuring ankle joint dorsiflexion. Fourteen asymptomatic individuals (8 male and 6 female) with a mean age of 28.2 years (range, 23-52) were enrolled into this study. The years of clinical experience of the five examiners averaged 10.4 years (range, 0-26). Four examiners used a modified Root, Weed and Orien method of measuring ankle joint dorsiflexion. The fifth examiner utilized a nonstandardized technique. A standard goniometer was used for bilateral measurements of ankle joint dorsiflexion with the knee extended and flexed. All five examiners repeated each measurement three times during each of the three sessions, with each session spaced at least 1 week apart. Results: The interclass correlation coefficient reveals a moderate intrarater and poor interrater reliability in ankle joint dorsiflexion measurements using a standard goniometer. More importantly, further analysis indicates that the use of a standardized technique for measurement of ankle joint dorsiflexion or years of clinical experience does not increase the intrarater or interrater reliability. Conclusions: The utility of the goniometric measurement of ankle joint dorsiflexion may be limited.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053231600&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053231600&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7547/1010407

DO - 10.7547/1010407

M3 - Article

C2 - 21957272

AN - SCOPUS:80053231600

VL - 101

SP - 407

EP - 414

JO - Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association

JF - Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association

SN - 8750-7315

IS - 5

ER -