Intersensory effects in the psychological refractory period

Ira H. Bernstein, Mark H. Clark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Two experiments examined reaction time (RT) to each of two stimulus events separated by short interstimulus intervals (1SI). The essential contrast was RT to the second visual signal, RT 2, in auditory-visual (A-V) vs visual-visual (V-V) sequences. With response, certain pairings in Experiment 1, an effect apparently demonstrating a single-channel process (Welford, 1952), was noted. RT 2 was generally faster for A-V as opposed to V-V sequences especially when Ss were uncertain as to the sequence that would occur. At 0-msec ISI, the RT 2 difference between sequences approached the RT! difference. More rapid RT 2 to A-V sequences was also observed with go vs no-go pairings in Experiment 2 when the initial event was a go signal. However, the RT difference disappeared upon error correction, making the RT 2 sequence difference of questionable relevance to the hypothetical single-channel process. RT 2 was more rapid following a null no-go signal when the no-go signal was contrasted with a visual as opposed to auditory go signal. The latter effect was independent of error and is consistent with channel-switching theory (Kristofferson, 1967).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)135-139
Number of pages5
JournalPerception & Psychophysics
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1971

Fingerprint

Psychological Refractory Periods
Reaction Time
experiment
time
Psychological
event

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Intersensory effects in the psychological refractory period. / Bernstein, Ira H.; Clark, Mark H.

In: Perception & Psychophysics, Vol. 9, No. 2, 03.1971, p. 135-139.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bernstein, Ira H. ; Clark, Mark H. / Intersensory effects in the psychological refractory period. In: Perception & Psychophysics. 1971 ; Vol. 9, No. 2. pp. 135-139.
@article{de081f4a928747aab649eb76160d0d9c,
title = "Intersensory effects in the psychological refractory period",
abstract = "Two experiments examined reaction time (RT) to each of two stimulus events separated by short interstimulus intervals (1SI). The essential contrast was RT to the second visual signal, RT 2, in auditory-visual (A-V) vs visual-visual (V-V) sequences. With response, certain pairings in Experiment 1, an effect apparently demonstrating a single-channel process (Welford, 1952), was noted. RT 2 was generally faster for A-V as opposed to V-V sequences especially when Ss were uncertain as to the sequence that would occur. At 0-msec ISI, the RT 2 difference between sequences approached the RT! difference. More rapid RT 2 to A-V sequences was also observed with go vs no-go pairings in Experiment 2 when the initial event was a go signal. However, the RT difference disappeared upon error correction, making the RT 2 sequence difference of questionable relevance to the hypothetical single-channel process. RT 2 was more rapid following a null no-go signal when the no-go signal was contrasted with a visual as opposed to auditory go signal. The latter effect was independent of error and is consistent with channel-switching theory (Kristofferson, 1967).",
author = "Bernstein, {Ira H.} and Clark, {Mark H.}",
year = "1971",
month = "3",
doi = "10.3758/BF03212615",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "135--139",
journal = "Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics",
issn = "1943-3921",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intersensory effects in the psychological refractory period

AU - Bernstein, Ira H.

AU - Clark, Mark H.

PY - 1971/3

Y1 - 1971/3

N2 - Two experiments examined reaction time (RT) to each of two stimulus events separated by short interstimulus intervals (1SI). The essential contrast was RT to the second visual signal, RT 2, in auditory-visual (A-V) vs visual-visual (V-V) sequences. With response, certain pairings in Experiment 1, an effect apparently demonstrating a single-channel process (Welford, 1952), was noted. RT 2 was generally faster for A-V as opposed to V-V sequences especially when Ss were uncertain as to the sequence that would occur. At 0-msec ISI, the RT 2 difference between sequences approached the RT! difference. More rapid RT 2 to A-V sequences was also observed with go vs no-go pairings in Experiment 2 when the initial event was a go signal. However, the RT difference disappeared upon error correction, making the RT 2 sequence difference of questionable relevance to the hypothetical single-channel process. RT 2 was more rapid following a null no-go signal when the no-go signal was contrasted with a visual as opposed to auditory go signal. The latter effect was independent of error and is consistent with channel-switching theory (Kristofferson, 1967).

AB - Two experiments examined reaction time (RT) to each of two stimulus events separated by short interstimulus intervals (1SI). The essential contrast was RT to the second visual signal, RT 2, in auditory-visual (A-V) vs visual-visual (V-V) sequences. With response, certain pairings in Experiment 1, an effect apparently demonstrating a single-channel process (Welford, 1952), was noted. RT 2 was generally faster for A-V as opposed to V-V sequences especially when Ss were uncertain as to the sequence that would occur. At 0-msec ISI, the RT 2 difference between sequences approached the RT! difference. More rapid RT 2 to A-V sequences was also observed with go vs no-go pairings in Experiment 2 when the initial event was a go signal. However, the RT difference disappeared upon error correction, making the RT 2 sequence difference of questionable relevance to the hypothetical single-channel process. RT 2 was more rapid following a null no-go signal when the no-go signal was contrasted with a visual as opposed to auditory go signal. The latter effect was independent of error and is consistent with channel-switching theory (Kristofferson, 1967).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864892386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864892386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03212615

DO - 10.3758/BF03212615

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84864892386

VL - 9

SP - 135

EP - 139

JO - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

JF - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

SN - 1943-3921

IS - 2

ER -