Intracorporeal electromechanical tissue morcellation: A critical review and recommendations for clinical practice

Kimberly A. Kho, Ted L. Anderson, Ceana H. Nezhat

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Electromechanical morcellators have come under scrutiny with concerns about complications involving iatrogenic dissemination of both benign and malignant tissues. Although the rapidly rotating blade has resulted in morcellator-related vascular and visceral injuries, equally concerning are the multiple reports in the literature demonstrating seeding of the abdominal cavity with tissue fragmented such as leiomyomas, endometriosis, adenomyosis, splenic and ovarian tissues, and occult cancers of the ovaries and uterus. Alternatives to intracorporeal electric morcellation for tissue extirpation through the vagina and through minilaparotomy are feasible, safe, and have been shown to have comparable, if not superior, outcomes without an increased need for laparotomy. Intracorporeal morcellation within a containment bag is another option to minimize the risk of iatrogenic tissue seeding. Patient safety is a priority with balanced goals of maximizing benefits and minimizing harm. When intracorporeal electromechanical morcellation is planned, physicians should discuss the risks and consequences with their patients. Although data are being collected to quantify and understand these risks more clearly, a minimally invasive alternative to unenclosed intracorporeal morcellation is favored when available. It is incumbent on surgeons to communicate the risks of practices and devices and to advocate for continued improvement in surgical instrumentation and techniques.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)787-793
Number of pages7
JournalObstetrics and Gynecology
Volume124
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 10 2014

Fingerprint

Laparotomy
Adenomyosis
Uterine Neoplasms
Abdominal Cavity
Vascular System Injuries
Leiomyoma
Vagina
Endometriosis
Patient Safety
Ovarian Neoplasms
Morcellation
Physicians
Equipment and Supplies
Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Intracorporeal electromechanical tissue morcellation : A critical review and recommendations for clinical practice. / Kho, Kimberly A.; Anderson, Ted L.; Nezhat, Ceana H.

In: Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 124, No. 4, 10.10.2014, p. 787-793.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9a0cce9059f14bc6aa5c7ed83c4659ab,
title = "Intracorporeal electromechanical tissue morcellation: A critical review and recommendations for clinical practice",
abstract = "Electromechanical morcellators have come under scrutiny with concerns about complications involving iatrogenic dissemination of both benign and malignant tissues. Although the rapidly rotating blade has resulted in morcellator-related vascular and visceral injuries, equally concerning are the multiple reports in the literature demonstrating seeding of the abdominal cavity with tissue fragmented such as leiomyomas, endometriosis, adenomyosis, splenic and ovarian tissues, and occult cancers of the ovaries and uterus. Alternatives to intracorporeal electric morcellation for tissue extirpation through the vagina and through minilaparotomy are feasible, safe, and have been shown to have comparable, if not superior, outcomes without an increased need for laparotomy. Intracorporeal morcellation within a containment bag is another option to minimize the risk of iatrogenic tissue seeding. Patient safety is a priority with balanced goals of maximizing benefits and minimizing harm. When intracorporeal electromechanical morcellation is planned, physicians should discuss the risks and consequences with their patients. Although data are being collected to quantify and understand these risks more clearly, a minimally invasive alternative to unenclosed intracorporeal morcellation is favored when available. It is incumbent on surgeons to communicate the risks of practices and devices and to advocate for continued improvement in surgical instrumentation and techniques.",
author = "Kho, {Kimberly A.} and Anderson, {Ted L.} and Nezhat, {Ceana H.}",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1097/AOG.0000000000000448",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "124",
pages = "787--793",
journal = "Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0029-7844",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intracorporeal electromechanical tissue morcellation

T2 - A critical review and recommendations for clinical practice

AU - Kho, Kimberly A.

AU - Anderson, Ted L.

AU - Nezhat, Ceana H.

PY - 2014/10/10

Y1 - 2014/10/10

N2 - Electromechanical morcellators have come under scrutiny with concerns about complications involving iatrogenic dissemination of both benign and malignant tissues. Although the rapidly rotating blade has resulted in morcellator-related vascular and visceral injuries, equally concerning are the multiple reports in the literature demonstrating seeding of the abdominal cavity with tissue fragmented such as leiomyomas, endometriosis, adenomyosis, splenic and ovarian tissues, and occult cancers of the ovaries and uterus. Alternatives to intracorporeal electric morcellation for tissue extirpation through the vagina and through minilaparotomy are feasible, safe, and have been shown to have comparable, if not superior, outcomes without an increased need for laparotomy. Intracorporeal morcellation within a containment bag is another option to minimize the risk of iatrogenic tissue seeding. Patient safety is a priority with balanced goals of maximizing benefits and minimizing harm. When intracorporeal electromechanical morcellation is planned, physicians should discuss the risks and consequences with their patients. Although data are being collected to quantify and understand these risks more clearly, a minimally invasive alternative to unenclosed intracorporeal morcellation is favored when available. It is incumbent on surgeons to communicate the risks of practices and devices and to advocate for continued improvement in surgical instrumentation and techniques.

AB - Electromechanical morcellators have come under scrutiny with concerns about complications involving iatrogenic dissemination of both benign and malignant tissues. Although the rapidly rotating blade has resulted in morcellator-related vascular and visceral injuries, equally concerning are the multiple reports in the literature demonstrating seeding of the abdominal cavity with tissue fragmented such as leiomyomas, endometriosis, adenomyosis, splenic and ovarian tissues, and occult cancers of the ovaries and uterus. Alternatives to intracorporeal electric morcellation for tissue extirpation through the vagina and through minilaparotomy are feasible, safe, and have been shown to have comparable, if not superior, outcomes without an increased need for laparotomy. Intracorporeal morcellation within a containment bag is another option to minimize the risk of iatrogenic tissue seeding. Patient safety is a priority with balanced goals of maximizing benefits and minimizing harm. When intracorporeal electromechanical morcellation is planned, physicians should discuss the risks and consequences with their patients. Although data are being collected to quantify and understand these risks more clearly, a minimally invasive alternative to unenclosed intracorporeal morcellation is favored when available. It is incumbent on surgeons to communicate the risks of practices and devices and to advocate for continued improvement in surgical instrumentation and techniques.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923617495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923617495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000448

DO - 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000448

M3 - Article

C2 - 25198260

AN - SCOPUS:84923617495

VL - 124

SP - 787

EP - 793

JO - Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0029-7844

IS - 4

ER -