Intraocular pressure measurement after hyperopic LASIK.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown that Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) underestimates intraocular pressure (IOP) following photorefractive keratometry (PRK) and myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements by Goldmann applanation tonometry and pneumotonometry (PT) after hyperopic LASIK. METHODS: The IOPs of 20 eyes of 15 patients who underwent hyperopia LASIK were prospectively evaluated. Central and peripheral IOP were measured with GAT and PT, and central and peripheral corneal thicknesses were measured with ultrasonographic pachymetry. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Postoperative GAT measurements of IOP made from the central (13.1+/-2.7 mm Hg) and peripheral (13.9+/-3.3 mm Hg) corneal areas were significantly lower (P <0.001) than central IOP measured preoperatively (17.0+/-2.5 mm Hg). Postoperative PT measurements from the central (17.4+/-3.2 mm Hg) and peripheral (17.6+/-2.9 mm Hg) corneal areas were slightly lower than preoperative central IOP (18.4+/-2.4 mm Hg), but not statistically significant. There were no significant differences between central and peripheral IOP measurements using either method. CONCLUSION: The data demonstrate that GAT may underestimate IOP measurement, following hyperopic LASIK.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)136-139
Number of pages4
JournalThe CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc
Volume28
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jul 2002

Fingerprint

Laser In Situ Keratomileusis
Intraocular Pressure
Manometry
Hyperopia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

@article{c6e42a77df9247338d46e2d290293255,
title = "Intraocular pressure measurement after hyperopic LASIK.",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown that Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) underestimates intraocular pressure (IOP) following photorefractive keratometry (PRK) and myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements by Goldmann applanation tonometry and pneumotonometry (PT) after hyperopic LASIK. METHODS: The IOPs of 20 eyes of 15 patients who underwent hyperopia LASIK were prospectively evaluated. Central and peripheral IOP were measured with GAT and PT, and central and peripheral corneal thicknesses were measured with ultrasonographic pachymetry. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Postoperative GAT measurements of IOP made from the central (13.1+/-2.7 mm Hg) and peripheral (13.9+/-3.3 mm Hg) corneal areas were significantly lower (P <0.001) than central IOP measured preoperatively (17.0+/-2.5 mm Hg). Postoperative PT measurements from the central (17.4+/-3.2 mm Hg) and peripheral (17.6+/-2.9 mm Hg) corneal areas were slightly lower than preoperative central IOP (18.4+/-2.4 mm Hg), but not statistically significant. There were no significant differences between central and peripheral IOP measurements using either method. CONCLUSION: The data demonstrate that GAT may underestimate IOP measurement, following hyperopic LASIK.",
author = "Wang, {Serena X} and Joanne Shen and McCulley, {James P} and Bowman, {Robert W} and Petroll, {Walter M} and Cavanagh, {Harrison D}",
year = "2002",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "136--139",
journal = "Eye and Contact Lense",
issn = "1542-2321",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intraocular pressure measurement after hyperopic LASIK.

AU - Wang, Serena X

AU - Shen, Joanne

AU - McCulley, James P

AU - Bowman, Robert W

AU - Petroll, Walter M

AU - Cavanagh, Harrison D

PY - 2002/7

Y1 - 2002/7

N2 - PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown that Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) underestimates intraocular pressure (IOP) following photorefractive keratometry (PRK) and myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements by Goldmann applanation tonometry and pneumotonometry (PT) after hyperopic LASIK. METHODS: The IOPs of 20 eyes of 15 patients who underwent hyperopia LASIK were prospectively evaluated. Central and peripheral IOP were measured with GAT and PT, and central and peripheral corneal thicknesses were measured with ultrasonographic pachymetry. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Postoperative GAT measurements of IOP made from the central (13.1+/-2.7 mm Hg) and peripheral (13.9+/-3.3 mm Hg) corneal areas were significantly lower (P <0.001) than central IOP measured preoperatively (17.0+/-2.5 mm Hg). Postoperative PT measurements from the central (17.4+/-3.2 mm Hg) and peripheral (17.6+/-2.9 mm Hg) corneal areas were slightly lower than preoperative central IOP (18.4+/-2.4 mm Hg), but not statistically significant. There were no significant differences between central and peripheral IOP measurements using either method. CONCLUSION: The data demonstrate that GAT may underestimate IOP measurement, following hyperopic LASIK.

AB - PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown that Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) underestimates intraocular pressure (IOP) following photorefractive keratometry (PRK) and myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements by Goldmann applanation tonometry and pneumotonometry (PT) after hyperopic LASIK. METHODS: The IOPs of 20 eyes of 15 patients who underwent hyperopia LASIK were prospectively evaluated. Central and peripheral IOP were measured with GAT and PT, and central and peripheral corneal thicknesses were measured with ultrasonographic pachymetry. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Postoperative GAT measurements of IOP made from the central (13.1+/-2.7 mm Hg) and peripheral (13.9+/-3.3 mm Hg) corneal areas were significantly lower (P <0.001) than central IOP measured preoperatively (17.0+/-2.5 mm Hg). Postoperative PT measurements from the central (17.4+/-3.2 mm Hg) and peripheral (17.6+/-2.9 mm Hg) corneal areas were slightly lower than preoperative central IOP (18.4+/-2.4 mm Hg), but not statistically significant. There were no significant differences between central and peripheral IOP measurements using either method. CONCLUSION: The data demonstrate that GAT may underestimate IOP measurement, following hyperopic LASIK.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036634258&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036634258&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12144232

AN - SCOPUS:0036634258

VL - 28

SP - 136

EP - 139

JO - Eye and Contact Lense

JF - Eye and Contact Lense

SN - 1542-2321

IS - 3

ER -