Intuitive control of a powered prosthetic leg during ambulation: A randomized clinical trial

Levi J. Hargrove, Aaron J. Young, Ann M. Simon, Nicholas P. Fey, Robert D. Lipschutz, Suzanne B. Finucane, Elizabeth G. Halsne, Kimberly A. Ingraham, Todd A. Kuiken

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

128 Scopus citations

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Some patients with lower leg amputations may be candidates for motorized prosthetic limbs. Optimal control of such devices requires accurate classification of the patient's ambulation mode (eg, on level ground or ascending stairs) and natural transitions between different ambulation modes. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of including electromyographic (EMG) data and historical information from prior gait strides in a real-time control system for a powered prosthetic leg capable of level-ground walking, stair ascent and descent, ramp ascent and descent, and natural transitions between these ambulation modes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Blinded, randomized crossover clinical trial conducted between August 2012 and November 2013 in a research laboratory at the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago. Participants were 7 patients with unilateral above-knee (n = 6) or knee-disarticulation (n = 1) amputations. All patients were capable of ambulation within their home and community using a passive prosthesis (ie, one that does not provide external power). INTERVENTIONS: Electrodes were placed over 9 residual limb muscles and EMG signals were recorded as patients ambulated and completed 20 circuit trials involving level-ground walking, ramp ascent and descent, and stair ascent and descent. Data were acquired simultaneously from 13 mechanical sensors embedded on the prosthesis. Two real-time pattern recognition algorithms, using either (1) mechanical sensor data alone or (2) mechanical sensor data in combination with EMG data and historical information from earlier in the gait cycle, were evaluated. The order in which patients used each configuration was randomized (1: 1 blocked randomization) and double-blinded so patients and experimenters did not know which control configuration was being used. MAIN OUTCOMESAND MEASURES: The main outcome of the study was classification error for each real-time control system. Classification error is defined as the percentage of steps incorrectly predicted by the control system. RESULTS: Including EMG signals and historical information in the real-time control system resulted in significantly lower classification error (mean, 7.9% [95% CI, 6.1%-9.7%]) across a mean of 683 steps (range, 640-756 steps) compared with using mechanical sensor data only (mean, 14.1% [95% CI, 9.3%-18.9%]) across a mean of 692 steps (range, 631-775 steps), with a mean difference between groups of 6.2% (95% CI, 2.7%-9.7%](P = .01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study of 7 patients with lower limb amputations, inclusion of EMG signals and temporal gait information reduced classification error across ambulation modes and during transitions between ambulation modes. These preliminary findings, if confirmed, have the potential to improve the control of powered leg prostheses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2244-2252
Number of pages9
JournalJAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
Volume313
Issue number22
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 9 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Intuitive control of a powered prosthetic leg during ambulation: A randomized clinical trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this