Invasive hemodynamic monitoring

Philip E. Greilich, William E. Johnston

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The clinical assessment of a patient’s volume status using physical examination and vital signs is often misleading. Bedside patient examination is only 30–50% accurate and clinical tests for assessing hypovolemia suffer from excessive observer bias and variability as well as poor reproducibility, interobserver agreement and sensitivity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationClinical Fluid Therapy in the Perioperative Setting
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages82-90
Number of pages9
ISBN (Electronic)9780511733253
ISBN (Print)9781107000988
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Invasive hemodynamic monitoring'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this