Is gatekeeping better than traditional care? A survey of physicians' attitudes

Ethan A. Halm, Nancyanne Causino, David Blumenthal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

102 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context. - Nearly all managed care plans rely on a physician 'gatekeeper' to control use of specialty, hospital, and other expensive services. Gatekeeping is intended to reduce costs while maintaining or improving quality of care by increasing coordination and prevention and reducing duplicative or inappropriate care. Whether gatekeeping achieves these goals remains largely unproven. Objective. - To assess physicians' attitudes about the effects of gatekeeping compared with traditional care on administrative work, quality of patient care, appropriateness of resource use, and cost. Design. - Cross-sectional survey of primary care physicians Setting. - Outpatient facilities in metropolitan Boston, Mass. Participants. - All physicians who served as both primary care gatekeepers and traditional Blue Cross/Blue Shield providers for the employees of Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston. Of the 330 physicians surveyed, 202 (61%) responded. Outcomes Measures. - Physician ratings of the effects of gatekeeping on 21 aspects of care, including administrative work, physician-patient interactions, decision making, appropriateness of resource use, cost, and quality of care. Results. - Physicians reported that gatekeeping (compared with traditional care) had a positive effect on control of costs, frequency, and appropriateness of preventive services and knowledge of a patient's overall care (P<.001). They also felt that gatekeeping increased paperwork and telephone calls and negatively affected the overall quality of care, access to specialists, ability to order expensive tests and procedures, freedom in clinical decisions, time spent with patients, physician-patient relationships, and appropriate use of hospitalizations and laboratory tests (P<.001). Overall, 32% of physicians rated gatekeeping as better than traditional care, 40% the same, 21% gatekeeping as worse, and 7% were of mixed opinion. Positive ratings of gatekeeping were associated with fewer years in clinical practice, generalist training, and experience with gatekeeping and health maintenance organization plans. Conclusions. - Physicians identified both positive and negative effects of gate-keeping. Overall, 72% of physicians thought gatekeeping was better than or comparable to traditional care arrangements.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1677-1681
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of the American Medical Association
Volume278
Issue number20
StatePublished - Nov 26 1997

Fingerprint

Gatekeeping
Physicians
Quality of Health Care
Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans
Costs and Cost Analysis
Patient Care
Surveys and Questionnaires
Physician-Patient Relations
Aptitude
Health Maintenance Organizations
Cost Control
Managed Care Programs
Primary Care Physicians
Telephone
General Hospitals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Is gatekeeping better than traditional care? A survey of physicians' attitudes. / Halm, Ethan A.; Causino, Nancyanne; Blumenthal, David.

In: Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 278, No. 20, 26.11.1997, p. 1677-1681.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Halm, Ethan A. ; Causino, Nancyanne ; Blumenthal, David. / Is gatekeeping better than traditional care? A survey of physicians' attitudes. In: Journal of the American Medical Association. 1997 ; Vol. 278, No. 20. pp. 1677-1681.
@article{7d01eb426fb042c2adfe83d34af82e0b,
title = "Is gatekeeping better than traditional care? A survey of physicians' attitudes",
abstract = "Context. - Nearly all managed care plans rely on a physician 'gatekeeper' to control use of specialty, hospital, and other expensive services. Gatekeeping is intended to reduce costs while maintaining or improving quality of care by increasing coordination and prevention and reducing duplicative or inappropriate care. Whether gatekeeping achieves these goals remains largely unproven. Objective. - To assess physicians' attitudes about the effects of gatekeeping compared with traditional care on administrative work, quality of patient care, appropriateness of resource use, and cost. Design. - Cross-sectional survey of primary care physicians Setting. - Outpatient facilities in metropolitan Boston, Mass. Participants. - All physicians who served as both primary care gatekeepers and traditional Blue Cross/Blue Shield providers for the employees of Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston. Of the 330 physicians surveyed, 202 (61{\%}) responded. Outcomes Measures. - Physician ratings of the effects of gatekeeping on 21 aspects of care, including administrative work, physician-patient interactions, decision making, appropriateness of resource use, cost, and quality of care. Results. - Physicians reported that gatekeeping (compared with traditional care) had a positive effect on control of costs, frequency, and appropriateness of preventive services and knowledge of a patient's overall care (P<.001). They also felt that gatekeeping increased paperwork and telephone calls and negatively affected the overall quality of care, access to specialists, ability to order expensive tests and procedures, freedom in clinical decisions, time spent with patients, physician-patient relationships, and appropriate use of hospitalizations and laboratory tests (P<.001). Overall, 32{\%} of physicians rated gatekeeping as better than traditional care, 40{\%} the same, 21{\%} gatekeeping as worse, and 7{\%} were of mixed opinion. Positive ratings of gatekeeping were associated with fewer years in clinical practice, generalist training, and experience with gatekeeping and health maintenance organization plans. Conclusions. - Physicians identified both positive and negative effects of gate-keeping. Overall, 72{\%} of physicians thought gatekeeping was better than or comparable to traditional care arrangements.",
author = "Halm, {Ethan A.} and Nancyanne Causino and David Blumenthal",
year = "1997",
month = "11",
day = "26",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "278",
pages = "1677--1681",
journal = "JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association",
issn = "0098-7484",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "20",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is gatekeeping better than traditional care? A survey of physicians' attitudes

AU - Halm, Ethan A.

AU - Causino, Nancyanne

AU - Blumenthal, David

PY - 1997/11/26

Y1 - 1997/11/26

N2 - Context. - Nearly all managed care plans rely on a physician 'gatekeeper' to control use of specialty, hospital, and other expensive services. Gatekeeping is intended to reduce costs while maintaining or improving quality of care by increasing coordination and prevention and reducing duplicative or inappropriate care. Whether gatekeeping achieves these goals remains largely unproven. Objective. - To assess physicians' attitudes about the effects of gatekeeping compared with traditional care on administrative work, quality of patient care, appropriateness of resource use, and cost. Design. - Cross-sectional survey of primary care physicians Setting. - Outpatient facilities in metropolitan Boston, Mass. Participants. - All physicians who served as both primary care gatekeepers and traditional Blue Cross/Blue Shield providers for the employees of Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston. Of the 330 physicians surveyed, 202 (61%) responded. Outcomes Measures. - Physician ratings of the effects of gatekeeping on 21 aspects of care, including administrative work, physician-patient interactions, decision making, appropriateness of resource use, cost, and quality of care. Results. - Physicians reported that gatekeeping (compared with traditional care) had a positive effect on control of costs, frequency, and appropriateness of preventive services and knowledge of a patient's overall care (P<.001). They also felt that gatekeeping increased paperwork and telephone calls and negatively affected the overall quality of care, access to specialists, ability to order expensive tests and procedures, freedom in clinical decisions, time spent with patients, physician-patient relationships, and appropriate use of hospitalizations and laboratory tests (P<.001). Overall, 32% of physicians rated gatekeeping as better than traditional care, 40% the same, 21% gatekeeping as worse, and 7% were of mixed opinion. Positive ratings of gatekeeping were associated with fewer years in clinical practice, generalist training, and experience with gatekeeping and health maintenance organization plans. Conclusions. - Physicians identified both positive and negative effects of gate-keeping. Overall, 72% of physicians thought gatekeeping was better than or comparable to traditional care arrangements.

AB - Context. - Nearly all managed care plans rely on a physician 'gatekeeper' to control use of specialty, hospital, and other expensive services. Gatekeeping is intended to reduce costs while maintaining or improving quality of care by increasing coordination and prevention and reducing duplicative or inappropriate care. Whether gatekeeping achieves these goals remains largely unproven. Objective. - To assess physicians' attitudes about the effects of gatekeeping compared with traditional care on administrative work, quality of patient care, appropriateness of resource use, and cost. Design. - Cross-sectional survey of primary care physicians Setting. - Outpatient facilities in metropolitan Boston, Mass. Participants. - All physicians who served as both primary care gatekeepers and traditional Blue Cross/Blue Shield providers for the employees of Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston. Of the 330 physicians surveyed, 202 (61%) responded. Outcomes Measures. - Physician ratings of the effects of gatekeeping on 21 aspects of care, including administrative work, physician-patient interactions, decision making, appropriateness of resource use, cost, and quality of care. Results. - Physicians reported that gatekeeping (compared with traditional care) had a positive effect on control of costs, frequency, and appropriateness of preventive services and knowledge of a patient's overall care (P<.001). They also felt that gatekeeping increased paperwork and telephone calls and negatively affected the overall quality of care, access to specialists, ability to order expensive tests and procedures, freedom in clinical decisions, time spent with patients, physician-patient relationships, and appropriate use of hospitalizations and laboratory tests (P<.001). Overall, 32% of physicians rated gatekeeping as better than traditional care, 40% the same, 21% gatekeeping as worse, and 7% were of mixed opinion. Positive ratings of gatekeeping were associated with fewer years in clinical practice, generalist training, and experience with gatekeeping and health maintenance organization plans. Conclusions. - Physicians identified both positive and negative effects of gate-keeping. Overall, 72% of physicians thought gatekeeping was better than or comparable to traditional care arrangements.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030723661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030723661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9388087

AN - SCOPUS:0030723661

VL - 278

SP - 1677

EP - 1681

JO - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

JF - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

SN - 0098-7484

IS - 20

ER -