Is newer always better? A comparative study of 3 lithotriptor generations: Editorial comment

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

@article{27d98825cd8145cd9368741ce1ed9634,

title = "Is newer always better? A comparative study of 3 lithotriptor generations: Editorial comment",

author = "Pearle, {Margaret S}",

year = "2005",

doi = "10.1590/s1677-55382005000300015",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "31",

pages = "271--272",

journal = "International Braz J Urol",

issn = "1677-5538",

publisher = "Brazilian Society of Urology",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is newer always better? A comparative study of 3 lithotriptor generations

T2 - Editorial comment

AU - Pearle, Margaret S

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=22744446239&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=22744446239&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1590/s1677-55382005000300015

DO - 10.1590/s1677-55382005000300015

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:22744446239

SN - 1677-5538

VL - 31

SP - 271

EP - 272

JO - International Braz J Urol

JF - International Braz J Urol

IS - 3

ER -