Is reverse shoulder arthroplasty appropriate for the treatment of fractures in the older patient? Early Observations

Christopher Lenarz, Yousef Shishani, Christopher McCrum, Robert J. Nowinski, T. Bradley Edwards, Reuben Gobezie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

105 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The treatment of comminuted proximal humerus fractures in older patients is challenging. Variable values of functional outcomes scores, ROMs, patient satisfaction, and bony healing have been reported with conventional techniques, including open reduction and internal fixation, percutaneous pinning, and hemiarthroplasty. Another alternative is reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, although it is unclear whether this provides better ROM or function. Questions/purposes: We (1) evaluated ROM, pain level, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores of patients who had a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for displaced three- and four-part proximal humerus fracture and (2) identified clinical and radiographic complications from the procedure. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 30 patients in three institutions who had undergone a primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for displaced three- or four-part proximal humerus fractures. Mean age was 77 years (range, 65-94 years). Minimum followup was 12 months (mean, 23 months; range, 12-36 months). Results: Mean postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 78 (range, 36-98), mean active forward flexion was 139° (range, 90°-180°), and mean active external rotation was 27° (range, 0°-45°). Mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons pain score was 0.7 (range, 0-5) and mean visual analog scale pain score was 1.1 (range, 0-5). Complications were identified in three of 30 patients (10%). Conclusions: At short term, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty relieved pain and improved function. The complication rate compared favorably with those reported for other treatment alternatives. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3324-3331
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Volume469
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2011

Fingerprint

Arthroplasty
Humerus
Elbow
Pain
Therapeutics
Hemiarthroplasty
Pain Measurement
Patient Satisfaction
Guidelines
Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Is reverse shoulder arthroplasty appropriate for the treatment of fractures in the older patient? Early Observations. / Lenarz, Christopher; Shishani, Yousef; McCrum, Christopher; Nowinski, Robert J.; Edwards, T. Bradley; Gobezie, Reuben.

In: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Vol. 469, No. 12, 01.12.2011, p. 3324-3331.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lenarz, Christopher ; Shishani, Yousef ; McCrum, Christopher ; Nowinski, Robert J. ; Edwards, T. Bradley ; Gobezie, Reuben. / Is reverse shoulder arthroplasty appropriate for the treatment of fractures in the older patient? Early Observations. In: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2011 ; Vol. 469, No. 12. pp. 3324-3331.
@article{5528bdcb28be4d899630261ef3b6e431,
title = "Is reverse shoulder arthroplasty appropriate for the treatment of fractures in the older patient?: Early Observations",
abstract = "Background: The treatment of comminuted proximal humerus fractures in older patients is challenging. Variable values of functional outcomes scores, ROMs, patient satisfaction, and bony healing have been reported with conventional techniques, including open reduction and internal fixation, percutaneous pinning, and hemiarthroplasty. Another alternative is reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, although it is unclear whether this provides better ROM or function. Questions/purposes: We (1) evaluated ROM, pain level, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores of patients who had a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for displaced three- and four-part proximal humerus fracture and (2) identified clinical and radiographic complications from the procedure. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 30 patients in three institutions who had undergone a primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for displaced three- or four-part proximal humerus fractures. Mean age was 77 years (range, 65-94 years). Minimum followup was 12 months (mean, 23 months; range, 12-36 months). Results: Mean postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 78 (range, 36-98), mean active forward flexion was 139° (range, 90°-180°), and mean active external rotation was 27° (range, 0°-45°). Mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons pain score was 0.7 (range, 0-5) and mean visual analog scale pain score was 1.1 (range, 0-5). Complications were identified in three of 30 patients (10{\%}). Conclusions: At short term, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty relieved pain and improved function. The complication rate compared favorably with those reported for other treatment alternatives. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.",
author = "Christopher Lenarz and Yousef Shishani and Christopher McCrum and Nowinski, {Robert J.} and Edwards, {T. Bradley} and Reuben Gobezie",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11999-011-2055-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "469",
pages = "3324--3331",
journal = "Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research",
issn = "0009-921X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is reverse shoulder arthroplasty appropriate for the treatment of fractures in the older patient?

T2 - Early Observations

AU - Lenarz, Christopher

AU - Shishani, Yousef

AU - McCrum, Christopher

AU - Nowinski, Robert J.

AU - Edwards, T. Bradley

AU - Gobezie, Reuben

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - Background: The treatment of comminuted proximal humerus fractures in older patients is challenging. Variable values of functional outcomes scores, ROMs, patient satisfaction, and bony healing have been reported with conventional techniques, including open reduction and internal fixation, percutaneous pinning, and hemiarthroplasty. Another alternative is reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, although it is unclear whether this provides better ROM or function. Questions/purposes: We (1) evaluated ROM, pain level, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores of patients who had a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for displaced three- and four-part proximal humerus fracture and (2) identified clinical and radiographic complications from the procedure. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 30 patients in three institutions who had undergone a primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for displaced three- or four-part proximal humerus fractures. Mean age was 77 years (range, 65-94 years). Minimum followup was 12 months (mean, 23 months; range, 12-36 months). Results: Mean postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 78 (range, 36-98), mean active forward flexion was 139° (range, 90°-180°), and mean active external rotation was 27° (range, 0°-45°). Mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons pain score was 0.7 (range, 0-5) and mean visual analog scale pain score was 1.1 (range, 0-5). Complications were identified in three of 30 patients (10%). Conclusions: At short term, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty relieved pain and improved function. The complication rate compared favorably with those reported for other treatment alternatives. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

AB - Background: The treatment of comminuted proximal humerus fractures in older patients is challenging. Variable values of functional outcomes scores, ROMs, patient satisfaction, and bony healing have been reported with conventional techniques, including open reduction and internal fixation, percutaneous pinning, and hemiarthroplasty. Another alternative is reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, although it is unclear whether this provides better ROM or function. Questions/purposes: We (1) evaluated ROM, pain level, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores of patients who had a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for displaced three- and four-part proximal humerus fracture and (2) identified clinical and radiographic complications from the procedure. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 30 patients in three institutions who had undergone a primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for displaced three- or four-part proximal humerus fractures. Mean age was 77 years (range, 65-94 years). Minimum followup was 12 months (mean, 23 months; range, 12-36 months). Results: Mean postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 78 (range, 36-98), mean active forward flexion was 139° (range, 90°-180°), and mean active external rotation was 27° (range, 0°-45°). Mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons pain score was 0.7 (range, 0-5) and mean visual analog scale pain score was 1.1 (range, 0-5). Complications were identified in three of 30 patients (10%). Conclusions: At short term, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty relieved pain and improved function. The complication rate compared favorably with those reported for other treatment alternatives. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82655172407&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=82655172407&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11999-011-2055-z

DO - 10.1007/s11999-011-2055-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 21879403

AN - SCOPUS:82655172407

VL - 469

SP - 3324

EP - 3331

JO - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

JF - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

SN - 0009-921X

IS - 12

ER -