Is the Concreteness Effect a Result of Underlying Network Interconnectivity?

Nancy R. Gee, Douglas L. Nelson, Daniel Krawczyk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two general classifications of theoretical explanations for concreteness effects are evaluated. Process theories are those that emphasize the nature of the processing initiated by the study items, and structural explanations are those that emphasize the role of long-term memory representations of the study items. A series of four experiments is presented in which structural variables such as the number of associates a word has in long-term memory (set size) and the density of the connections among those associates (connectivity) are crossed with concreteness under several different instructional manipulations in the cued recall task. The results consistently demonstrate that concreteness effects and effects related to the associative structure of the study items are not dependent upon one another, but instead have additive effects on performance. The results allow for the elimination of the structural explanations, in favor of one of the process theories: dual code theory. The results are also consistent with the overall framework of memory proposed by the PIER model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)479-497
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Memory and Language
Volume40
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1999

Fingerprint

Long-Term Memory
Data storage equipment
manipulation
Processing
Concreteness
experiment
Experiments
performance
Associates
Long-term Memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Is the Concreteness Effect a Result of Underlying Network Interconnectivity? / Gee, Nancy R.; Nelson, Douglas L.; Krawczyk, Daniel.

In: Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 40, No. 4, 05.1999, p. 479-497.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5eefcb6dbcb748d5a74157b06ae1211f,
title = "Is the Concreteness Effect a Result of Underlying Network Interconnectivity?",
abstract = "Two general classifications of theoretical explanations for concreteness effects are evaluated. Process theories are those that emphasize the nature of the processing initiated by the study items, and structural explanations are those that emphasize the role of long-term memory representations of the study items. A series of four experiments is presented in which structural variables such as the number of associates a word has in long-term memory (set size) and the density of the connections among those associates (connectivity) are crossed with concreteness under several different instructional manipulations in the cued recall task. The results consistently demonstrate that concreteness effects and effects related to the associative structure of the study items are not dependent upon one another, but instead have additive effects on performance. The results allow for the elimination of the structural explanations, in favor of one of the process theories: dual code theory. The results are also consistent with the overall framework of memory proposed by the PIER model.",
author = "Gee, {Nancy R.} and Nelson, {Douglas L.} and Daniel Krawczyk",
year = "1999",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1006/jmla.1998.2627",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "479--497",
journal = "Journal of Memory and Language",
issn = "0749-596X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is the Concreteness Effect a Result of Underlying Network Interconnectivity?

AU - Gee, Nancy R.

AU - Nelson, Douglas L.

AU - Krawczyk, Daniel

PY - 1999/5

Y1 - 1999/5

N2 - Two general classifications of theoretical explanations for concreteness effects are evaluated. Process theories are those that emphasize the nature of the processing initiated by the study items, and structural explanations are those that emphasize the role of long-term memory representations of the study items. A series of four experiments is presented in which structural variables such as the number of associates a word has in long-term memory (set size) and the density of the connections among those associates (connectivity) are crossed with concreteness under several different instructional manipulations in the cued recall task. The results consistently demonstrate that concreteness effects and effects related to the associative structure of the study items are not dependent upon one another, but instead have additive effects on performance. The results allow for the elimination of the structural explanations, in favor of one of the process theories: dual code theory. The results are also consistent with the overall framework of memory proposed by the PIER model.

AB - Two general classifications of theoretical explanations for concreteness effects are evaluated. Process theories are those that emphasize the nature of the processing initiated by the study items, and structural explanations are those that emphasize the role of long-term memory representations of the study items. A series of four experiments is presented in which structural variables such as the number of associates a word has in long-term memory (set size) and the density of the connections among those associates (connectivity) are crossed with concreteness under several different instructional manipulations in the cued recall task. The results consistently demonstrate that concreteness effects and effects related to the associative structure of the study items are not dependent upon one another, but instead have additive effects on performance. The results allow for the elimination of the structural explanations, in favor of one of the process theories: dual code theory. The results are also consistent with the overall framework of memory proposed by the PIER model.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0006162816&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0006162816&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/jmla.1998.2627

DO - 10.1006/jmla.1998.2627

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0006162816

VL - 40

SP - 479

EP - 497

JO - Journal of Memory and Language

JF - Journal of Memory and Language

SN - 0749-596X

IS - 4

ER -