Is there a critical level of plantar foot pressure to identify patients at risk for neuropathic foot ulceration?

David G. Armstrong, Edgar J G Peters, Kyriacos A. Athanasiou, Lawrence A. Lavery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

171 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify a point along the spectrum of peak plantar forefoot pressure that has an optimum combination of sensitivity and specificity to screen for neuropathic ulceration. We enrolled 219 diabetic patients in this case-control study in an approximate 2:1 control:case ratio. Cases were defined as patients with an active or recently healed neuropathic ulceration. Controls were defined as those with no history of ulceration. All patients had peak plantar pressures analyzed with the EMED gait analysis system. Peak plantar pressure was, as expected, significantly higher for patients with ulcers compared to controls [83.1 ± 24.7 N/cm2 (range, 10-125) vs. 62.7 ± 24.4 N/cm2 (range, 7.3-113), p < .001]. The ulcer group was clearly skewed toward a higher prevalence of elevated peak plantar forefoot pressure compared with the control group, which displayed the opposite trend (control group skewness = 0.286, kurtosis = -0.482; ulcer group skewness = -0.389, kurtosis = -0.289). Using receiver operating characteristic analysis, the optimal cut-point, as determined by a balance of sensitivity and specificity was 70 N/cm2, which yielded a sensitivity of 70.0% and a specificity of 65.1%. We concluded that, while there is no optimal cut-point for clearly screening patients for risk of foot ulceration, the higher the peak pressure, the higher the commensurate risk.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)303-307
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
Volume37
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jul 1998

Fingerprint

Foot
Pressure
Ulcer
Sensitivity and Specificity
Control Groups
Gait
ROC Curve
Case-Control Studies

Keywords

  • Amputation
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Pressure
  • Ulceration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Is there a critical level of plantar foot pressure to identify patients at risk for neuropathic foot ulceration? / Armstrong, David G.; Peters, Edgar J G; Athanasiou, Kyriacos A.; Lavery, Lawrence A.

In: Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Vol. 37, No. 4, 07.1998, p. 303-307.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{de81b3f257064bb78a677eb47d4a6898,
title = "Is there a critical level of plantar foot pressure to identify patients at risk for neuropathic foot ulceration?",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to identify a point along the spectrum of peak plantar forefoot pressure that has an optimum combination of sensitivity and specificity to screen for neuropathic ulceration. We enrolled 219 diabetic patients in this case-control study in an approximate 2:1 control:case ratio. Cases were defined as patients with an active or recently healed neuropathic ulceration. Controls were defined as those with no history of ulceration. All patients had peak plantar pressures analyzed with the EMED gait analysis system. Peak plantar pressure was, as expected, significantly higher for patients with ulcers compared to controls [83.1 ± 24.7 N/cm2 (range, 10-125) vs. 62.7 ± 24.4 N/cm2 (range, 7.3-113), p < .001]. The ulcer group was clearly skewed toward a higher prevalence of elevated peak plantar forefoot pressure compared with the control group, which displayed the opposite trend (control group skewness = 0.286, kurtosis = -0.482; ulcer group skewness = -0.389, kurtosis = -0.289). Using receiver operating characteristic analysis, the optimal cut-point, as determined by a balance of sensitivity and specificity was 70 N/cm2, which yielded a sensitivity of 70.0{\%} and a specificity of 65.1{\%}. We concluded that, while there is no optimal cut-point for clearly screening patients for risk of foot ulceration, the higher the peak pressure, the higher the commensurate risk.",
keywords = "Amputation, Diabetes mellitus, Pressure, Ulceration",
author = "Armstrong, {David G.} and Peters, {Edgar J G} and Athanasiou, {Kyriacos A.} and Lavery, {Lawrence A.}",
year = "1998",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "303--307",
journal = "Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery",
issn = "1067-2516",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is there a critical level of plantar foot pressure to identify patients at risk for neuropathic foot ulceration?

AU - Armstrong, David G.

AU - Peters, Edgar J G

AU - Athanasiou, Kyriacos A.

AU - Lavery, Lawrence A.

PY - 1998/7

Y1 - 1998/7

N2 - The purpose of this study was to identify a point along the spectrum of peak plantar forefoot pressure that has an optimum combination of sensitivity and specificity to screen for neuropathic ulceration. We enrolled 219 diabetic patients in this case-control study in an approximate 2:1 control:case ratio. Cases were defined as patients with an active or recently healed neuropathic ulceration. Controls were defined as those with no history of ulceration. All patients had peak plantar pressures analyzed with the EMED gait analysis system. Peak plantar pressure was, as expected, significantly higher for patients with ulcers compared to controls [83.1 ± 24.7 N/cm2 (range, 10-125) vs. 62.7 ± 24.4 N/cm2 (range, 7.3-113), p < .001]. The ulcer group was clearly skewed toward a higher prevalence of elevated peak plantar forefoot pressure compared with the control group, which displayed the opposite trend (control group skewness = 0.286, kurtosis = -0.482; ulcer group skewness = -0.389, kurtosis = -0.289). Using receiver operating characteristic analysis, the optimal cut-point, as determined by a balance of sensitivity and specificity was 70 N/cm2, which yielded a sensitivity of 70.0% and a specificity of 65.1%. We concluded that, while there is no optimal cut-point for clearly screening patients for risk of foot ulceration, the higher the peak pressure, the higher the commensurate risk.

AB - The purpose of this study was to identify a point along the spectrum of peak plantar forefoot pressure that has an optimum combination of sensitivity and specificity to screen for neuropathic ulceration. We enrolled 219 diabetic patients in this case-control study in an approximate 2:1 control:case ratio. Cases were defined as patients with an active or recently healed neuropathic ulceration. Controls were defined as those with no history of ulceration. All patients had peak plantar pressures analyzed with the EMED gait analysis system. Peak plantar pressure was, as expected, significantly higher for patients with ulcers compared to controls [83.1 ± 24.7 N/cm2 (range, 10-125) vs. 62.7 ± 24.4 N/cm2 (range, 7.3-113), p < .001]. The ulcer group was clearly skewed toward a higher prevalence of elevated peak plantar forefoot pressure compared with the control group, which displayed the opposite trend (control group skewness = 0.286, kurtosis = -0.482; ulcer group skewness = -0.389, kurtosis = -0.289). Using receiver operating characteristic analysis, the optimal cut-point, as determined by a balance of sensitivity and specificity was 70 N/cm2, which yielded a sensitivity of 70.0% and a specificity of 65.1%. We concluded that, while there is no optimal cut-point for clearly screening patients for risk of foot ulceration, the higher the peak pressure, the higher the commensurate risk.

KW - Amputation

KW - Diabetes mellitus

KW - Pressure

KW - Ulceration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031855676&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031855676&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 303

EP - 307

JO - Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery

JF - Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery

SN - 1067-2516

IS - 4

ER -