Laboratory testing of segmental spinal instrumentation versus traditional Harrington instrumentation for scoliosis treatment

D. R. Wenger, J. J. Carollo, J. A. Wilkerson, K. Wauters, J. A. Herring

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

66 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors have tested 51 instrumented calf spines in vitro, using a scoliosis simulator, to evaluate the adequacy of fixation and nature of acute failure seen with various methods of scoliosis instrumentation. Tests were performed in compressive loading, rotation, and forward bending on the following instrumentation systems: (I) Harrington distraction, (II) Harrington distraction plus compression connected by transverse approximators, (III) Harrington distraction plus segmental laminar wires, and (IV) Luque double 'L' rods plus segmental laminar wires. The study demonstrated that the addition of segmental fixation to scoliosis instrumentation provides improved stability because of (a) multiple fixation sites and (b) prevention of deformity, especially kyphosis, within the instrumented segment (an important contributor to hook cutout when a single Harrington distraction rod is tested). Failure with the Harrington rod was always by fracture at the metal-bone interface, while failure with the Luque method always occurred outside the instrumented segment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)265-269
Number of pages5
JournalSpine
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1982

Fingerprint

Scoliosis
Kyphosis
Spine
Metals
Bone and Bones

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Laboratory testing of segmental spinal instrumentation versus traditional Harrington instrumentation for scoliosis treatment. / Wenger, D. R.; Carollo, J. J.; Wilkerson, J. A.; Wauters, K.; Herring, J. A.

In: Spine, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1982, p. 265-269.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wenger, D. R. ; Carollo, J. J. ; Wilkerson, J. A. ; Wauters, K. ; Herring, J. A. / Laboratory testing of segmental spinal instrumentation versus traditional Harrington instrumentation for scoliosis treatment. In: Spine. 1982 ; Vol. 7, No. 3. pp. 265-269.
@article{4284e4e3c26647f49bf88223dec57919,
title = "Laboratory testing of segmental spinal instrumentation versus traditional Harrington instrumentation for scoliosis treatment",
abstract = "The authors have tested 51 instrumented calf spines in vitro, using a scoliosis simulator, to evaluate the adequacy of fixation and nature of acute failure seen with various methods of scoliosis instrumentation. Tests were performed in compressive loading, rotation, and forward bending on the following instrumentation systems: (I) Harrington distraction, (II) Harrington distraction plus compression connected by transverse approximators, (III) Harrington distraction plus segmental laminar wires, and (IV) Luque double 'L' rods plus segmental laminar wires. The study demonstrated that the addition of segmental fixation to scoliosis instrumentation provides improved stability because of (a) multiple fixation sites and (b) prevention of deformity, especially kyphosis, within the instrumented segment (an important contributor to hook cutout when a single Harrington distraction rod is tested). Failure with the Harrington rod was always by fracture at the metal-bone interface, while failure with the Luque method always occurred outside the instrumented segment.",
author = "Wenger, {D. R.} and Carollo, {J. J.} and Wilkerson, {J. A.} and K. Wauters and Herring, {J. A.}",
year = "1982",
doi = "10.1097/00007632-198205000-00012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "265--269",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laboratory testing of segmental spinal instrumentation versus traditional Harrington instrumentation for scoliosis treatment

AU - Wenger, D. R.

AU - Carollo, J. J.

AU - Wilkerson, J. A.

AU - Wauters, K.

AU - Herring, J. A.

PY - 1982

Y1 - 1982

N2 - The authors have tested 51 instrumented calf spines in vitro, using a scoliosis simulator, to evaluate the adequacy of fixation and nature of acute failure seen with various methods of scoliosis instrumentation. Tests were performed in compressive loading, rotation, and forward bending on the following instrumentation systems: (I) Harrington distraction, (II) Harrington distraction plus compression connected by transverse approximators, (III) Harrington distraction plus segmental laminar wires, and (IV) Luque double 'L' rods plus segmental laminar wires. The study demonstrated that the addition of segmental fixation to scoliosis instrumentation provides improved stability because of (a) multiple fixation sites and (b) prevention of deformity, especially kyphosis, within the instrumented segment (an important contributor to hook cutout when a single Harrington distraction rod is tested). Failure with the Harrington rod was always by fracture at the metal-bone interface, while failure with the Luque method always occurred outside the instrumented segment.

AB - The authors have tested 51 instrumented calf spines in vitro, using a scoliosis simulator, to evaluate the adequacy of fixation and nature of acute failure seen with various methods of scoliosis instrumentation. Tests were performed in compressive loading, rotation, and forward bending on the following instrumentation systems: (I) Harrington distraction, (II) Harrington distraction plus compression connected by transverse approximators, (III) Harrington distraction plus segmental laminar wires, and (IV) Luque double 'L' rods plus segmental laminar wires. The study demonstrated that the addition of segmental fixation to scoliosis instrumentation provides improved stability because of (a) multiple fixation sites and (b) prevention of deformity, especially kyphosis, within the instrumented segment (an important contributor to hook cutout when a single Harrington distraction rod is tested). Failure with the Harrington rod was always by fracture at the metal-bone interface, while failure with the Luque method always occurred outside the instrumented segment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019977824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019977824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00007632-198205000-00012

DO - 10.1097/00007632-198205000-00012

M3 - Article

C2 - 7112240

AN - SCOPUS:0019977824

VL - 7

SP - 265

EP - 269

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 3

ER -