Laparoscopic appendectomy

A report on 1164 operations at a single-institution, safety-net hospital

Ryan P. Dumas, Madhu Subramanian, Erica Hodgman, Michelle Arevalo, Gabriella Nguyen, Kevin Li, Tochi Aijwe, Brian H Williams, Alexander Eastman, Stephen S Luk, Christian T Minshall, Michael W Cripps

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is the standard of care for the treatment of acute appendicitis. There is an ongoing debate regarding the optimal management of appendicitis, which led us to study outcomes after an appendectomy at a large safety-net hospital. We hypothesize that despite a high-risk population, LA remains a safe and effective treatment for acute appendicitis. A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent an appendectomy from 2011 to 2013. The primary end point was significant morbidity defined as a score of three or greater on the Clavien-Dindo scale of surgical morbidity. Thousand hundred and sixty-four patients underwent an appendectomy. A total of 1102 (94.7%) patients underwent either an LA or laparoscopic converted to open appendectomy, and 62 (5.3%) patients underwent an open appendectomy (OA). Two hundred and forty six patients (21.1%) had complicated appendicitis. Laparoscopic converted to OA conversion rate was 4.4 per cent and differed between years (P < 0.001). LA had a significantly shorter length of stay, shorter length of postoperative antibiotics, and less postoperative morbidity. When limited to only patients with complicated appendicitis, major morbidity was still greater in the OA group (22.6 vs 52.0%, P 5 0.001). Length of stay was significantly longer in the OA group [3.42 (2.01, 5.97) vs 7.04 (5.05, 10.13), P < 0.001]. Odds for complication were 2.6 times greater in the OA group compared with the LA group. In the absence of peritonitis and systemic illness necessitating urgent laparotomy, patients who are laparoscopic surgical candidates should be offered an LA. Our study demonstrates that these patients have better outcomes and shorter hospital stays.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1117-1119
Number of pages3
JournalAmerican Surgeon
Volume84
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018

Fingerprint

Safety-net Providers
Appendectomy
Appendicitis
Morbidity
Length of Stay

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Dumas, R. P., Subramanian, M., Hodgman, E., Arevalo, M., Nguyen, G., Li, K., ... Cripps, M. W. (2018). Laparoscopic appendectomy: A report on 1164 operations at a single-institution, safety-net hospital. American Surgeon, 84(6), 1117-1119.

Laparoscopic appendectomy : A report on 1164 operations at a single-institution, safety-net hospital. / Dumas, Ryan P.; Subramanian, Madhu; Hodgman, Erica; Arevalo, Michelle; Nguyen, Gabriella; Li, Kevin; Aijwe, Tochi; Williams, Brian H; Eastman, Alexander; Luk, Stephen S; Minshall, Christian T; Cripps, Michael W.

In: American Surgeon, Vol. 84, No. 6, 01.06.2018, p. 1117-1119.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Dumas, RP, Subramanian, M, Hodgman, E, Arevalo, M, Nguyen, G, Li, K, Aijwe, T, Williams, BH, Eastman, A, Luk, SS, Minshall, CT & Cripps, MW 2018, 'Laparoscopic appendectomy: A report on 1164 operations at a single-institution, safety-net hospital', American Surgeon, vol. 84, no. 6, pp. 1117-1119.
Dumas RP, Subramanian M, Hodgman E, Arevalo M, Nguyen G, Li K et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy: A report on 1164 operations at a single-institution, safety-net hospital. American Surgeon. 2018 Jun 1;84(6):1117-1119.
Dumas, Ryan P. ; Subramanian, Madhu ; Hodgman, Erica ; Arevalo, Michelle ; Nguyen, Gabriella ; Li, Kevin ; Aijwe, Tochi ; Williams, Brian H ; Eastman, Alexander ; Luk, Stephen S ; Minshall, Christian T ; Cripps, Michael W. / Laparoscopic appendectomy : A report on 1164 operations at a single-institution, safety-net hospital. In: American Surgeon. 2018 ; Vol. 84, No. 6. pp. 1117-1119.
@article{8880862fd42d4ffb85a9170d4c7a70b9,
title = "Laparoscopic appendectomy: A report on 1164 operations at a single-institution, safety-net hospital",
abstract = "Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is the standard of care for the treatment of acute appendicitis. There is an ongoing debate regarding the optimal management of appendicitis, which led us to study outcomes after an appendectomy at a large safety-net hospital. We hypothesize that despite a high-risk population, LA remains a safe and effective treatment for acute appendicitis. A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent an appendectomy from 2011 to 2013. The primary end point was significant morbidity defined as a score of three or greater on the Clavien-Dindo scale of surgical morbidity. Thousand hundred and sixty-four patients underwent an appendectomy. A total of 1102 (94.7{\%}) patients underwent either an LA or laparoscopic converted to open appendectomy, and 62 (5.3{\%}) patients underwent an open appendectomy (OA). Two hundred and forty six patients (21.1{\%}) had complicated appendicitis. Laparoscopic converted to OA conversion rate was 4.4 per cent and differed between years (P < 0.001). LA had a significantly shorter length of stay, shorter length of postoperative antibiotics, and less postoperative morbidity. When limited to only patients with complicated appendicitis, major morbidity was still greater in the OA group (22.6 vs 52.0{\%}, P 5 0.001). Length of stay was significantly longer in the OA group [3.42 (2.01, 5.97) vs 7.04 (5.05, 10.13), P < 0.001]. Odds for complication were 2.6 times greater in the OA group compared with the LA group. In the absence of peritonitis and systemic illness necessitating urgent laparotomy, patients who are laparoscopic surgical candidates should be offered an LA. Our study demonstrates that these patients have better outcomes and shorter hospital stays.",
author = "Dumas, {Ryan P.} and Madhu Subramanian and Erica Hodgman and Michelle Arevalo and Gabriella Nguyen and Kevin Li and Tochi Aijwe and Williams, {Brian H} and Alexander Eastman and Luk, {Stephen S} and Minshall, {Christian T} and Cripps, {Michael W}",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "1117--1119",
journal = "American Surgeon",
issn = "0003-1348",
publisher = "Southeastern Surgical Congress",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic appendectomy

T2 - A report on 1164 operations at a single-institution, safety-net hospital

AU - Dumas, Ryan P.

AU - Subramanian, Madhu

AU - Hodgman, Erica

AU - Arevalo, Michelle

AU - Nguyen, Gabriella

AU - Li, Kevin

AU - Aijwe, Tochi

AU - Williams, Brian H

AU - Eastman, Alexander

AU - Luk, Stephen S

AU - Minshall, Christian T

AU - Cripps, Michael W

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is the standard of care for the treatment of acute appendicitis. There is an ongoing debate regarding the optimal management of appendicitis, which led us to study outcomes after an appendectomy at a large safety-net hospital. We hypothesize that despite a high-risk population, LA remains a safe and effective treatment for acute appendicitis. A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent an appendectomy from 2011 to 2013. The primary end point was significant morbidity defined as a score of three or greater on the Clavien-Dindo scale of surgical morbidity. Thousand hundred and sixty-four patients underwent an appendectomy. A total of 1102 (94.7%) patients underwent either an LA or laparoscopic converted to open appendectomy, and 62 (5.3%) patients underwent an open appendectomy (OA). Two hundred and forty six patients (21.1%) had complicated appendicitis. Laparoscopic converted to OA conversion rate was 4.4 per cent and differed between years (P < 0.001). LA had a significantly shorter length of stay, shorter length of postoperative antibiotics, and less postoperative morbidity. When limited to only patients with complicated appendicitis, major morbidity was still greater in the OA group (22.6 vs 52.0%, P 5 0.001). Length of stay was significantly longer in the OA group [3.42 (2.01, 5.97) vs 7.04 (5.05, 10.13), P < 0.001]. Odds for complication were 2.6 times greater in the OA group compared with the LA group. In the absence of peritonitis and systemic illness necessitating urgent laparotomy, patients who are laparoscopic surgical candidates should be offered an LA. Our study demonstrates that these patients have better outcomes and shorter hospital stays.

AB - Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is the standard of care for the treatment of acute appendicitis. There is an ongoing debate regarding the optimal management of appendicitis, which led us to study outcomes after an appendectomy at a large safety-net hospital. We hypothesize that despite a high-risk population, LA remains a safe and effective treatment for acute appendicitis. A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent an appendectomy from 2011 to 2013. The primary end point was significant morbidity defined as a score of three or greater on the Clavien-Dindo scale of surgical morbidity. Thousand hundred and sixty-four patients underwent an appendectomy. A total of 1102 (94.7%) patients underwent either an LA or laparoscopic converted to open appendectomy, and 62 (5.3%) patients underwent an open appendectomy (OA). Two hundred and forty six patients (21.1%) had complicated appendicitis. Laparoscopic converted to OA conversion rate was 4.4 per cent and differed between years (P < 0.001). LA had a significantly shorter length of stay, shorter length of postoperative antibiotics, and less postoperative morbidity. When limited to only patients with complicated appendicitis, major morbidity was still greater in the OA group (22.6 vs 52.0%, P 5 0.001). Length of stay was significantly longer in the OA group [3.42 (2.01, 5.97) vs 7.04 (5.05, 10.13), P < 0.001]. Odds for complication were 2.6 times greater in the OA group compared with the LA group. In the absence of peritonitis and systemic illness necessitating urgent laparotomy, patients who are laparoscopic surgical candidates should be offered an LA. Our study demonstrates that these patients have better outcomes and shorter hospital stays.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049688495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049688495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

VL - 84

SP - 1117

EP - 1119

JO - American Surgeon

JF - American Surgeon

SN - 0003-1348

IS - 6

ER -