TY - JOUR
T1 - Laparoscopic appendectomy
T2 - An unnecessary and expensive prodedure in children?
AU - Little, Danny C.
AU - Custer, Monford D.
AU - May, Brett H.
AU - Blalock, Shannon E.
AU - Cooney, Donald R.
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - Background/Purpose: Laparoscopic Appendectomy (LA) is a safe procedure in adults resulting in shorter hospitalization and sooner return to activity. The relative merits of LA and open appendectomy (OA) are evaluated in this first prospective and randomized study in children. Methods: A total of 129 children with appendicitis were included. Forty-three boys and 45 girls, age 1 to 16 years, were enrolled. Randomization was determined by sealed assignment card. OA utilized a 3- to 4-cm right lower quadrant, muscle-splitting incision. Wounds were closed without drains. Antibiotics, when used, consisted of gentamycin, clindamycin, and ampicillin. LA was performed by experienced surgeons utilizing a 3-trocar technique with reusable instruments. Twenty-one children (24%) were perforated. Patients were discharged as soon as they were taking a diet and afebrile. Statistical comparisons were by Fisher's Exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Results: There were no differences in postoperative analgesia, resumption of oral intake, length of hospitalization, return to normal activities, or morbidity. Laparoscopic appendectomy was associated with longer operating times and increased cost. Conclusions: Laparoscopic appendectomy in children is not associated with the same advantages reported in adults. LA is a more expensive alternative and offers no advantages related to pain relief, length of stay, return to normal activities, or morbidity.
AB - Background/Purpose: Laparoscopic Appendectomy (LA) is a safe procedure in adults resulting in shorter hospitalization and sooner return to activity. The relative merits of LA and open appendectomy (OA) are evaluated in this first prospective and randomized study in children. Methods: A total of 129 children with appendicitis were included. Forty-three boys and 45 girls, age 1 to 16 years, were enrolled. Randomization was determined by sealed assignment card. OA utilized a 3- to 4-cm right lower quadrant, muscle-splitting incision. Wounds were closed without drains. Antibiotics, when used, consisted of gentamycin, clindamycin, and ampicillin. LA was performed by experienced surgeons utilizing a 3-trocar technique with reusable instruments. Twenty-one children (24%) were perforated. Patients were discharged as soon as they were taking a diet and afebrile. Statistical comparisons were by Fisher's Exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Results: There were no differences in postoperative analgesia, resumption of oral intake, length of hospitalization, return to normal activities, or morbidity. Laparoscopic appendectomy was associated with longer operating times and increased cost. Conclusions: Laparoscopic appendectomy in children is not associated with the same advantages reported in adults. LA is a more expensive alternative and offers no advantages related to pain relief, length of stay, return to normal activities, or morbidity.
KW - Laparoscopic appendectomy
KW - Prospective randomized
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036185354&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036185354&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1053/jpsu.2002.30841
DO - 10.1053/jpsu.2002.30841
M3 - Article
C2 - 11877640
AN - SCOPUS:0036185354
SN - 0022-3468
VL - 37
SP - 310
EP - 317
JO - Journal of Pediatric Surgery
JF - Journal of Pediatric Surgery
IS - 3
ER -