Laparoscopic Decision Making: Impact of Preoperative Reading and Laparoscopic Experience

Mindy L. Samuelson, Jeffrey A Cadeddu, Edward D. Matsumoto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: A competent laparoscopic surgeon requires good technical skills and good surgical judgment. The assessment of technical skills using bench models and simulators has been well studied. However, there has been a paucity of studies examining the cognitive aspects of surgery. We developed a novel tool to assess the procedural knowledge and higher level decision making required for successful laparoscopic nephrectomy. We assessed the effect of laparoscopic experience and the effect of self-preparation or preoperative reading on surgical decision making abilities using a novel assessment tool and methodology. Materials and Methods: A total of 17 novice and advanced urology residents were randomized to preoperative reading or no preoperative reading. Subjects viewed laparoscopic nephrectomy clips and verbalized their thought processes. Their performance was transcribed and blindly rated using a new surgical decision making rating scale. Results: The correlation with overall surgical decision making rating scale score was good for years of training and moderate for the number of laparoscopic cases performed (r = 0.7 and 0.54, respectively, p <0.05). Preoperative reading did not have a significant impact on the overall surgical decision making rating scale score (p >0.05). However, when stratified by laparoscopic experience level (fewer than 10 cases), preoperative reading had a significant impact on the performance of novices with respect to the knowledge components of the procedure but not the judgment domain (each p >0.05). Conclusions: Overall preoperative reading did not improve the surgical decision making rating scale. Novice procedural knowledge benefited from preoperative reading but not surgical judgment. The surgical decision making rating scale appears promising and it may have future implications for assessing surgical competency.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1553-1557
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume176
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2006

Fingerprint

Reading
Decision Making
Nephrectomy
Aptitude
Urology
Surgical Instruments

Keywords

  • education, medical
  • internship and residency
  • kidney
  • laparoscopy
  • nephrectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Laparoscopic Decision Making : Impact of Preoperative Reading and Laparoscopic Experience. / Samuelson, Mindy L.; Cadeddu, Jeffrey A; Matsumoto, Edward D.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 176, No. 4, 10.2006, p. 1553-1557.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Samuelson, Mindy L. ; Cadeddu, Jeffrey A ; Matsumoto, Edward D. / Laparoscopic Decision Making : Impact of Preoperative Reading and Laparoscopic Experience. In: Journal of Urology. 2006 ; Vol. 176, No. 4. pp. 1553-1557.
@article{518766d2a6e6468fb8676d8fc36d72bf,
title = "Laparoscopic Decision Making: Impact of Preoperative Reading and Laparoscopic Experience",
abstract = "Purpose: A competent laparoscopic surgeon requires good technical skills and good surgical judgment. The assessment of technical skills using bench models and simulators has been well studied. However, there has been a paucity of studies examining the cognitive aspects of surgery. We developed a novel tool to assess the procedural knowledge and higher level decision making required for successful laparoscopic nephrectomy. We assessed the effect of laparoscopic experience and the effect of self-preparation or preoperative reading on surgical decision making abilities using a novel assessment tool and methodology. Materials and Methods: A total of 17 novice and advanced urology residents were randomized to preoperative reading or no preoperative reading. Subjects viewed laparoscopic nephrectomy clips and verbalized their thought processes. Their performance was transcribed and blindly rated using a new surgical decision making rating scale. Results: The correlation with overall surgical decision making rating scale score was good for years of training and moderate for the number of laparoscopic cases performed (r = 0.7 and 0.54, respectively, p <0.05). Preoperative reading did not have a significant impact on the overall surgical decision making rating scale score (p >0.05). However, when stratified by laparoscopic experience level (fewer than 10 cases), preoperative reading had a significant impact on the performance of novices with respect to the knowledge components of the procedure but not the judgment domain (each p >0.05). Conclusions: Overall preoperative reading did not improve the surgical decision making rating scale. Novice procedural knowledge benefited from preoperative reading but not surgical judgment. The surgical decision making rating scale appears promising and it may have future implications for assessing surgical competency.",
keywords = "education, medical, internship and residency, kidney, laparoscopy, nephrectomy",
author = "Samuelson, {Mindy L.} and Cadeddu, {Jeffrey A} and Matsumoto, {Edward D.}",
year = "2006",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2006.06.100",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "176",
pages = "1553--1557",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic Decision Making

T2 - Impact of Preoperative Reading and Laparoscopic Experience

AU - Samuelson, Mindy L.

AU - Cadeddu, Jeffrey A

AU - Matsumoto, Edward D.

PY - 2006/10

Y1 - 2006/10

N2 - Purpose: A competent laparoscopic surgeon requires good technical skills and good surgical judgment. The assessment of technical skills using bench models and simulators has been well studied. However, there has been a paucity of studies examining the cognitive aspects of surgery. We developed a novel tool to assess the procedural knowledge and higher level decision making required for successful laparoscopic nephrectomy. We assessed the effect of laparoscopic experience and the effect of self-preparation or preoperative reading on surgical decision making abilities using a novel assessment tool and methodology. Materials and Methods: A total of 17 novice and advanced urology residents were randomized to preoperative reading or no preoperative reading. Subjects viewed laparoscopic nephrectomy clips and verbalized their thought processes. Their performance was transcribed and blindly rated using a new surgical decision making rating scale. Results: The correlation with overall surgical decision making rating scale score was good for years of training and moderate for the number of laparoscopic cases performed (r = 0.7 and 0.54, respectively, p <0.05). Preoperative reading did not have a significant impact on the overall surgical decision making rating scale score (p >0.05). However, when stratified by laparoscopic experience level (fewer than 10 cases), preoperative reading had a significant impact on the performance of novices with respect to the knowledge components of the procedure but not the judgment domain (each p >0.05). Conclusions: Overall preoperative reading did not improve the surgical decision making rating scale. Novice procedural knowledge benefited from preoperative reading but not surgical judgment. The surgical decision making rating scale appears promising and it may have future implications for assessing surgical competency.

AB - Purpose: A competent laparoscopic surgeon requires good technical skills and good surgical judgment. The assessment of technical skills using bench models and simulators has been well studied. However, there has been a paucity of studies examining the cognitive aspects of surgery. We developed a novel tool to assess the procedural knowledge and higher level decision making required for successful laparoscopic nephrectomy. We assessed the effect of laparoscopic experience and the effect of self-preparation or preoperative reading on surgical decision making abilities using a novel assessment tool and methodology. Materials and Methods: A total of 17 novice and advanced urology residents were randomized to preoperative reading or no preoperative reading. Subjects viewed laparoscopic nephrectomy clips and verbalized their thought processes. Their performance was transcribed and blindly rated using a new surgical decision making rating scale. Results: The correlation with overall surgical decision making rating scale score was good for years of training and moderate for the number of laparoscopic cases performed (r = 0.7 and 0.54, respectively, p <0.05). Preoperative reading did not have a significant impact on the overall surgical decision making rating scale score (p >0.05). However, when stratified by laparoscopic experience level (fewer than 10 cases), preoperative reading had a significant impact on the performance of novices with respect to the knowledge components of the procedure but not the judgment domain (each p >0.05). Conclusions: Overall preoperative reading did not improve the surgical decision making rating scale. Novice procedural knowledge benefited from preoperative reading but not surgical judgment. The surgical decision making rating scale appears promising and it may have future implications for assessing surgical competency.

KW - education, medical

KW - internship and residency

KW - kidney

KW - laparoscopy

KW - nephrectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748106482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748106482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2006.06.100

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2006.06.100

M3 - Article

C2 - 16952680

AN - SCOPUS:33748106482

VL - 176

SP - 1553

EP - 1557

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 4

ER -