Laparoscopic nephrectomy in patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment

Oner Sanli, Tzevat Tefik, Mazhar Ortac, Meltem Karadeniz, Tayfun Oktar, Ismet Nane, Murat Tunc

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Objectives: To report our experience with laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN) in patients undergoing hemodialysis compared with normal counterparts. Methods: Seventeen patients (20 renal units, Group 1) undergoing hemodialysis underwent LN, which was indicated due to nonfunctioning kidney in 17 and suspected malignancy in 3 renal units. Radical nephrectomy (RN), simple nephrectomy (SN), and simple nephroureterectomy (SNU) were performed in 3, 9, and 8 cases, respectively. For comparison, 101 patients (Group 2) without CRF (chronic renal failure) who had undergone LN were evaluated. In this group, RN, SN, SNU and radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) were performed in 48, 41, 8, and 4 patients, respectively. Results: The mean age (36.9±13.1 vs. 48.7±19.4yr, P=0.002) and BMI (22.1±4.8 vs. 26.2±5.1kg/m2, P=0.001) were lower in Group 1, whereas ASA (physical status score of American Society of Anesthesiologists) score (2.8±0.4 vs. 1.5±0.7, P<0.001) was lower in Group 2. The estimated blood loss (111±114 vs. 184±335mL, P=0.34) was higher in Group 2. Both groups were comparable in regard to mean operative time (133±79 vs. 119±45, P=0.70), hematocrit drop (4.69±3.9 vs. 3.86±3.0, P=0.29) and hospital stay (3.6±3.3 vs. 3.3±2.4 days, P=0.34). Meanwhile, when only patients undergoing SN and SNU in the study cohort (n=17 in Group 1 and n=49 in Group 2) are taken into consideration, no significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in terms of any kind of above-mentioned perioperative parameters. No case in Group 1 was converted to open surgery due to metabolic problems. Conclusions: LN in patients undergoing hemodialysis may be performed safely by an experienced laparoscopy team.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)534-540
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2011

Fingerprint

Nephrectomy
Renal Dialysis
Therapeutics
Kidney
Operative Time
Hematocrit
Laparoscopy
Chronic Kidney Failure
Length of Stay
Cohort Studies

Keywords

  • Hemodialysis
  • Kidney
  • Laparoscopy
  • Nephrectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Laparoscopic nephrectomy in patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment. / Sanli, Oner; Tefik, Tzevat; Ortac, Mazhar; Karadeniz, Meltem; Oktar, Tayfun; Nane, Ismet; Tunc, Murat.

In: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, Vol. 14, No. 4, 01.10.2011, p. 534-540.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sanli, Oner ; Tefik, Tzevat ; Ortac, Mazhar ; Karadeniz, Meltem ; Oktar, Tayfun ; Nane, Ismet ; Tunc, Murat. / Laparoscopic nephrectomy in patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment. In: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. 2011 ; Vol. 14, No. 4. pp. 534-540.
@article{df4cfdcbf9b14a609ffd1b3ee9e256e4,
title = "Laparoscopic nephrectomy in patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment",
abstract = "Background and Objectives: To report our experience with laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN) in patients undergoing hemodialysis compared with normal counterparts. Methods: Seventeen patients (20 renal units, Group 1) undergoing hemodialysis underwent LN, which was indicated due to nonfunctioning kidney in 17 and suspected malignancy in 3 renal units. Radical nephrectomy (RN), simple nephrectomy (SN), and simple nephroureterectomy (SNU) were performed in 3, 9, and 8 cases, respectively. For comparison, 101 patients (Group 2) without CRF (chronic renal failure) who had undergone LN were evaluated. In this group, RN, SN, SNU and radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) were performed in 48, 41, 8, and 4 patients, respectively. Results: The mean age (36.9±13.1 vs. 48.7±19.4yr, P=0.002) and BMI (22.1±4.8 vs. 26.2±5.1kg/m2, P=0.001) were lower in Group 1, whereas ASA (physical status score of American Society of Anesthesiologists) score (2.8±0.4 vs. 1.5±0.7, P<0.001) was lower in Group 2. The estimated blood loss (111±114 vs. 184±335mL, P=0.34) was higher in Group 2. Both groups were comparable in regard to mean operative time (133±79 vs. 119±45, P=0.70), hematocrit drop (4.69±3.9 vs. 3.86±3.0, P=0.29) and hospital stay (3.6±3.3 vs. 3.3±2.4 days, P=0.34). Meanwhile, when only patients undergoing SN and SNU in the study cohort (n=17 in Group 1 and n=49 in Group 2) are taken into consideration, no significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in terms of any kind of above-mentioned perioperative parameters. No case in Group 1 was converted to open surgery due to metabolic problems. Conclusions: LN in patients undergoing hemodialysis may be performed safely by an experienced laparoscopy team.",
keywords = "Hemodialysis, Kidney, Laparoscopy, Nephrectomy",
author = "Oner Sanli and Tzevat Tefik and Mazhar Ortac and Meltem Karadeniz and Tayfun Oktar and Ismet Nane and Murat Tunc",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4293/108680810X12924466008123",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "534--540",
journal = "Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons",
issn = "1086-8089",
publisher = "Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic nephrectomy in patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment

AU - Sanli, Oner

AU - Tefik, Tzevat

AU - Ortac, Mazhar

AU - Karadeniz, Meltem

AU - Oktar, Tayfun

AU - Nane, Ismet

AU - Tunc, Murat

PY - 2011/10/1

Y1 - 2011/10/1

N2 - Background and Objectives: To report our experience with laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN) in patients undergoing hemodialysis compared with normal counterparts. Methods: Seventeen patients (20 renal units, Group 1) undergoing hemodialysis underwent LN, which was indicated due to nonfunctioning kidney in 17 and suspected malignancy in 3 renal units. Radical nephrectomy (RN), simple nephrectomy (SN), and simple nephroureterectomy (SNU) were performed in 3, 9, and 8 cases, respectively. For comparison, 101 patients (Group 2) without CRF (chronic renal failure) who had undergone LN were evaluated. In this group, RN, SN, SNU and radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) were performed in 48, 41, 8, and 4 patients, respectively. Results: The mean age (36.9±13.1 vs. 48.7±19.4yr, P=0.002) and BMI (22.1±4.8 vs. 26.2±5.1kg/m2, P=0.001) were lower in Group 1, whereas ASA (physical status score of American Society of Anesthesiologists) score (2.8±0.4 vs. 1.5±0.7, P<0.001) was lower in Group 2. The estimated blood loss (111±114 vs. 184±335mL, P=0.34) was higher in Group 2. Both groups were comparable in regard to mean operative time (133±79 vs. 119±45, P=0.70), hematocrit drop (4.69±3.9 vs. 3.86±3.0, P=0.29) and hospital stay (3.6±3.3 vs. 3.3±2.4 days, P=0.34). Meanwhile, when only patients undergoing SN and SNU in the study cohort (n=17 in Group 1 and n=49 in Group 2) are taken into consideration, no significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in terms of any kind of above-mentioned perioperative parameters. No case in Group 1 was converted to open surgery due to metabolic problems. Conclusions: LN in patients undergoing hemodialysis may be performed safely by an experienced laparoscopy team.

AB - Background and Objectives: To report our experience with laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN) in patients undergoing hemodialysis compared with normal counterparts. Methods: Seventeen patients (20 renal units, Group 1) undergoing hemodialysis underwent LN, which was indicated due to nonfunctioning kidney in 17 and suspected malignancy in 3 renal units. Radical nephrectomy (RN), simple nephrectomy (SN), and simple nephroureterectomy (SNU) were performed in 3, 9, and 8 cases, respectively. For comparison, 101 patients (Group 2) without CRF (chronic renal failure) who had undergone LN were evaluated. In this group, RN, SN, SNU and radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) were performed in 48, 41, 8, and 4 patients, respectively. Results: The mean age (36.9±13.1 vs. 48.7±19.4yr, P=0.002) and BMI (22.1±4.8 vs. 26.2±5.1kg/m2, P=0.001) were lower in Group 1, whereas ASA (physical status score of American Society of Anesthesiologists) score (2.8±0.4 vs. 1.5±0.7, P<0.001) was lower in Group 2. The estimated blood loss (111±114 vs. 184±335mL, P=0.34) was higher in Group 2. Both groups were comparable in regard to mean operative time (133±79 vs. 119±45, P=0.70), hematocrit drop (4.69±3.9 vs. 3.86±3.0, P=0.29) and hospital stay (3.6±3.3 vs. 3.3±2.4 days, P=0.34). Meanwhile, when only patients undergoing SN and SNU in the study cohort (n=17 in Group 1 and n=49 in Group 2) are taken into consideration, no significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in terms of any kind of above-mentioned perioperative parameters. No case in Group 1 was converted to open surgery due to metabolic problems. Conclusions: LN in patients undergoing hemodialysis may be performed safely by an experienced laparoscopy team.

KW - Hemodialysis

KW - Kidney

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Nephrectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957936774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79957936774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4293/108680810X12924466008123

DO - 10.4293/108680810X12924466008123

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 534

EP - 540

JO - Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

JF - Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

SN - 1086-8089

IS - 4

ER -