Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Lessons Learned in Surgical Technique

Fernando P. Secin, Karim Touijer, Nicholas T. Karanikolas, Ganesh V. Raj, Bertrand Guillonneau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Describe the rationale for and surgical modifications to the original Montsouris technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). Methods: This is a retrospective review of laparoscopic prostatectomy and experience involving 1071 cases performed between January 1998 and March 2006 at two centres: the Departments of Urology of the Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France (first 502 cases) and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (next 569 cases). Results: Since the first systematic description of the LRP technique, several modifications have been implemented. Most of the modifications have not yet been subjected to rigorous prospective evaluation, but, in our experience, they reduce complications or shorten operative time, and presumably lead to better oncologic results with improved preservation of quality of life. We describe those modifications to the LRP technique 8 yr after the program started, including urachal-sparing transperitoneal approach, extended lymph node dissection, systematic identification of the posterior longitudinal fascia of the detrusor muscle during dissection of the posterior bladder neck, intra/inter/extrafascial dissection of the neurovascular bundles, anatomic dissection of the apex with ligature of the dorsal vascular complex after its sectioning, anchoring of the anterior urethrovesical anastomotic stitches to the endopelvic fascia and pubovesical ligaments, extraction and evaluation of the specimen before completing the anastomosis, and use of postoperative care pathways. Conclusions: LRP technique has been refined, which allowed us to decrease the positive surgical margins rate and improve functional outcomes. It is hoped younger laparoscopic surgeons can take advantage of our experience to build on their expertise.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)942-949
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Urology, Supplements
Volume5
Issue number19
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2006

Fingerprint

Prostatectomy
Dissection
Fascia
Postoperative Care
Urology
Paris
Operative Time
Lymph Node Excision
Ligaments
France
Ligation
Blood Vessels
Urinary Bladder
Quality of Life
Muscles
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Laparoscopy
  • Prostate
  • Prostatectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy : Lessons Learned in Surgical Technique. / Secin, Fernando P.; Touijer, Karim; Karanikolas, Nicholas T.; Raj, Ganesh V.; Guillonneau, Bertrand.

In: European Urology, Supplements, Vol. 5, No. 19, 11.2006, p. 942-949.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Secin, Fernando P. ; Touijer, Karim ; Karanikolas, Nicholas T. ; Raj, Ganesh V. ; Guillonneau, Bertrand. / Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy : Lessons Learned in Surgical Technique. In: European Urology, Supplements. 2006 ; Vol. 5, No. 19. pp. 942-949.
@article{3a7e005a88df43e8acd1cc89045e6686,
title = "Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Lessons Learned in Surgical Technique",
abstract = "Objective: Describe the rationale for and surgical modifications to the original Montsouris technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). Methods: This is a retrospective review of laparoscopic prostatectomy and experience involving 1071 cases performed between January 1998 and March 2006 at two centres: the Departments of Urology of the Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France (first 502 cases) and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (next 569 cases). Results: Since the first systematic description of the LRP technique, several modifications have been implemented. Most of the modifications have not yet been subjected to rigorous prospective evaluation, but, in our experience, they reduce complications or shorten operative time, and presumably lead to better oncologic results with improved preservation of quality of life. We describe those modifications to the LRP technique 8 yr after the program started, including urachal-sparing transperitoneal approach, extended lymph node dissection, systematic identification of the posterior longitudinal fascia of the detrusor muscle during dissection of the posterior bladder neck, intra/inter/extrafascial dissection of the neurovascular bundles, anatomic dissection of the apex with ligature of the dorsal vascular complex after its sectioning, anchoring of the anterior urethrovesical anastomotic stitches to the endopelvic fascia and pubovesical ligaments, extraction and evaluation of the specimen before completing the anastomosis, and use of postoperative care pathways. Conclusions: LRP technique has been refined, which allowed us to decrease the positive surgical margins rate and improve functional outcomes. It is hoped younger laparoscopic surgeons can take advantage of our experience to build on their expertise.",
keywords = "Cancer, Laparoscopy, Prostate, Prostatectomy",
author = "Secin, {Fernando P.} and Karim Touijer and Karanikolas, {Nicholas T.} and Raj, {Ganesh V.} and Bertrand Guillonneau",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.eursup.2006.08.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "942--949",
journal = "European Urology, Supplements",
issn = "1569-9056",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "19",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

T2 - Lessons Learned in Surgical Technique

AU - Secin, Fernando P.

AU - Touijer, Karim

AU - Karanikolas, Nicholas T.

AU - Raj, Ganesh V.

AU - Guillonneau, Bertrand

PY - 2006/11

Y1 - 2006/11

N2 - Objective: Describe the rationale for and surgical modifications to the original Montsouris technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). Methods: This is a retrospective review of laparoscopic prostatectomy and experience involving 1071 cases performed between January 1998 and March 2006 at two centres: the Departments of Urology of the Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France (first 502 cases) and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (next 569 cases). Results: Since the first systematic description of the LRP technique, several modifications have been implemented. Most of the modifications have not yet been subjected to rigorous prospective evaluation, but, in our experience, they reduce complications or shorten operative time, and presumably lead to better oncologic results with improved preservation of quality of life. We describe those modifications to the LRP technique 8 yr after the program started, including urachal-sparing transperitoneal approach, extended lymph node dissection, systematic identification of the posterior longitudinal fascia of the detrusor muscle during dissection of the posterior bladder neck, intra/inter/extrafascial dissection of the neurovascular bundles, anatomic dissection of the apex with ligature of the dorsal vascular complex after its sectioning, anchoring of the anterior urethrovesical anastomotic stitches to the endopelvic fascia and pubovesical ligaments, extraction and evaluation of the specimen before completing the anastomosis, and use of postoperative care pathways. Conclusions: LRP technique has been refined, which allowed us to decrease the positive surgical margins rate and improve functional outcomes. It is hoped younger laparoscopic surgeons can take advantage of our experience to build on their expertise.

AB - Objective: Describe the rationale for and surgical modifications to the original Montsouris technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). Methods: This is a retrospective review of laparoscopic prostatectomy and experience involving 1071 cases performed between January 1998 and March 2006 at two centres: the Departments of Urology of the Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France (first 502 cases) and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (next 569 cases). Results: Since the first systematic description of the LRP technique, several modifications have been implemented. Most of the modifications have not yet been subjected to rigorous prospective evaluation, but, in our experience, they reduce complications or shorten operative time, and presumably lead to better oncologic results with improved preservation of quality of life. We describe those modifications to the LRP technique 8 yr after the program started, including urachal-sparing transperitoneal approach, extended lymph node dissection, systematic identification of the posterior longitudinal fascia of the detrusor muscle during dissection of the posterior bladder neck, intra/inter/extrafascial dissection of the neurovascular bundles, anatomic dissection of the apex with ligature of the dorsal vascular complex after its sectioning, anchoring of the anterior urethrovesical anastomotic stitches to the endopelvic fascia and pubovesical ligaments, extraction and evaluation of the specimen before completing the anastomosis, and use of postoperative care pathways. Conclusions: LRP technique has been refined, which allowed us to decrease the positive surgical margins rate and improve functional outcomes. It is hoped younger laparoscopic surgeons can take advantage of our experience to build on their expertise.

KW - Cancer

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Prostate

KW - Prostatectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750360394&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750360394&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.eursup.2006.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.eursup.2006.08.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33750360394

VL - 5

SP - 942

EP - 949

JO - European Urology, Supplements

JF - European Urology, Supplements

SN - 1569-9056

IS - 19

ER -