Laparoscopic skills training

Daniel J Scott, William N. Young, Seifu T. Tesfay, William H. Frawley, Robert V Rege, Daniel B. Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

120 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to quantify the learning curve of a previously validated laparoscopic skills curriculum. Methods: Second-year medical students (MS2, n = 11) and second (PGY2, n = 11) and third (PGY3, n = 6) year surgery residents were enrolled into a curriculum using five video-trainer tasks. All subjects underwent baseline testing, training (30 minutes per day for 10 days), and final testing. Scores were based on completion time. The relationship between task completion time and the number of practice repetitions was examined. Improvement (the difference in baseline and final performance) amongst groups was compared by one-way analysis of variance using the baseline score as a covariate; P <0.05 indicated significance. Results: Baseline scores were not significantly different. Final scores were significantly better for MS2s versus PGY3s. Adjusted-improvement was significantly larger for the MS2s compared with PGY2s and PGY3s, and for PGY2s compared with PGY3s. The mean number of repetitions corresponding to a predicted 90th percentile score was 32. Conclusions: Inexperienced subjects benefit the most from skills training. For maximal benefit, we recommend that each task be practiced for at least 30 to 35 repetitions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)137-142
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume182
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Curriculum
Learning Curve
Medical Students
Analysis of Variance
Practice (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Laparoscopy
  • Learning curve
  • Skills curriculum
  • Skills training
  • Surgical education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Scott, D. J., Young, W. N., Tesfay, S. T., Frawley, W. H., Rege, R. V., & Jones, D. B. (2001). Laparoscopic skills training. American Journal of Surgery, 182(2), 137-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00669-9

Laparoscopic skills training. / Scott, Daniel J; Young, William N.; Tesfay, Seifu T.; Frawley, William H.; Rege, Robert V; Jones, Daniel B.

In: American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 182, No. 2, 2001, p. 137-142.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Scott, DJ, Young, WN, Tesfay, ST, Frawley, WH, Rege, RV & Jones, DB 2001, 'Laparoscopic skills training', American Journal of Surgery, vol. 182, no. 2, pp. 137-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00669-9
Scott, Daniel J ; Young, William N. ; Tesfay, Seifu T. ; Frawley, William H. ; Rege, Robert V ; Jones, Daniel B. / Laparoscopic skills training. In: American Journal of Surgery. 2001 ; Vol. 182, No. 2. pp. 137-142.
@article{5406170145b847f981f97e408d8379d4,
title = "Laparoscopic skills training",
abstract = "Background: The purpose of this study was to quantify the learning curve of a previously validated laparoscopic skills curriculum. Methods: Second-year medical students (MS2, n = 11) and second (PGY2, n = 11) and third (PGY3, n = 6) year surgery residents were enrolled into a curriculum using five video-trainer tasks. All subjects underwent baseline testing, training (30 minutes per day for 10 days), and final testing. Scores were based on completion time. The relationship between task completion time and the number of practice repetitions was examined. Improvement (the difference in baseline and final performance) amongst groups was compared by one-way analysis of variance using the baseline score as a covariate; P <0.05 indicated significance. Results: Baseline scores were not significantly different. Final scores were significantly better for MS2s versus PGY3s. Adjusted-improvement was significantly larger for the MS2s compared with PGY2s and PGY3s, and for PGY2s compared with PGY3s. The mean number of repetitions corresponding to a predicted 90th percentile score was 32. Conclusions: Inexperienced subjects benefit the most from skills training. For maximal benefit, we recommend that each task be practiced for at least 30 to 35 repetitions.",
keywords = "Laparoscopy, Learning curve, Skills curriculum, Skills training, Surgical education",
author = "Scott, {Daniel J} and Young, {William N.} and Tesfay, {Seifu T.} and Frawley, {William H.} and Rege, {Robert V} and Jones, {Daniel B.}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00669-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "182",
pages = "137--142",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic skills training

AU - Scott, Daniel J

AU - Young, William N.

AU - Tesfay, Seifu T.

AU - Frawley, William H.

AU - Rege, Robert V

AU - Jones, Daniel B.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Background: The purpose of this study was to quantify the learning curve of a previously validated laparoscopic skills curriculum. Methods: Second-year medical students (MS2, n = 11) and second (PGY2, n = 11) and third (PGY3, n = 6) year surgery residents were enrolled into a curriculum using five video-trainer tasks. All subjects underwent baseline testing, training (30 minutes per day for 10 days), and final testing. Scores were based on completion time. The relationship between task completion time and the number of practice repetitions was examined. Improvement (the difference in baseline and final performance) amongst groups was compared by one-way analysis of variance using the baseline score as a covariate; P <0.05 indicated significance. Results: Baseline scores were not significantly different. Final scores were significantly better for MS2s versus PGY3s. Adjusted-improvement was significantly larger for the MS2s compared with PGY2s and PGY3s, and for PGY2s compared with PGY3s. The mean number of repetitions corresponding to a predicted 90th percentile score was 32. Conclusions: Inexperienced subjects benefit the most from skills training. For maximal benefit, we recommend that each task be practiced for at least 30 to 35 repetitions.

AB - Background: The purpose of this study was to quantify the learning curve of a previously validated laparoscopic skills curriculum. Methods: Second-year medical students (MS2, n = 11) and second (PGY2, n = 11) and third (PGY3, n = 6) year surgery residents were enrolled into a curriculum using five video-trainer tasks. All subjects underwent baseline testing, training (30 minutes per day for 10 days), and final testing. Scores were based on completion time. The relationship between task completion time and the number of practice repetitions was examined. Improvement (the difference in baseline and final performance) amongst groups was compared by one-way analysis of variance using the baseline score as a covariate; P <0.05 indicated significance. Results: Baseline scores were not significantly different. Final scores were significantly better for MS2s versus PGY3s. Adjusted-improvement was significantly larger for the MS2s compared with PGY2s and PGY3s, and for PGY2s compared with PGY3s. The mean number of repetitions corresponding to a predicted 90th percentile score was 32. Conclusions: Inexperienced subjects benefit the most from skills training. For maximal benefit, we recommend that each task be practiced for at least 30 to 35 repetitions.

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Learning curve

KW - Skills curriculum

KW - Skills training

KW - Surgical education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034808119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034808119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00669-9

DO - 10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00669-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 11574084

AN - SCOPUS:0034808119

VL - 182

SP - 137

EP - 142

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 2

ER -