Laparoscopy alone is superior to peritoneal cytology in staging gastric and esophageal carcinoma

M. B. Wilkiemeyer, S. C. Bieligk, R. Ashfaq, D. B. Jones, Robert V Rege, J. B. Fleming

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopy identifies metastatic disease in patients with upper gastrointestinal malignancies; however, it has been suggested that cytological examination of peritoneal washings may increase the diagnostic yield. We hypothesize that the addition of cytologic washings to a standardized staging laparoscopy is unnecessary for the identification of intraabdominal metastasis in patients with gastric/esophageal cancer. Methods: Forty patients with gastric/esophageal cancer were prospectively evaluated. Patients successfully underwent a diagnostic laparoscopy protocol (with biopsies) during which peritoneal washings were obtained and processed for cytologic analysis. Laparoscopic versus cytologic identification of intraabdominal metastasis were compared. Results: Forty patients successfully completed laparoscopy with collection of peritoneal washings. Laparoscopic examination of the peritoneal cavity upstaged 21 (52.5%) patients. Laparoscopic examination consistently identified a statistically significant higher number of positive patients than cytologic examination of peritoneal washings (p = 0.001) and examination of cytologic washings alone failed to identify 45% of patients with positive findings and laparoscopy. The addition of cytologic examination added no additional stage IV patients to the laparoscopy-negative group. Conclusion: A standardized laparoscopic examination alone is sufficient for the identification of intraabdominal metastatic disease in patients with gastric and esophageal cancer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)852-856
Number of pages5
JournalSurgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
Volume18
Issue number5
StatePublished - May 2004

Fingerprint

Laparoscopy
Cell Biology
Stomach
Carcinoma
Esophageal Neoplasms
Stomach Neoplasms
Neoplasm Metastasis
Peritoneal Cavity
Biopsy

Keywords

  • Esophageal cancer
  • Gastric cancer
  • Peritoneal cytology
  • Staging laparoscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Laparoscopy alone is superior to peritoneal cytology in staging gastric and esophageal carcinoma. / Wilkiemeyer, M. B.; Bieligk, S. C.; Ashfaq, R.; Jones, D. B.; Rege, Robert V; Fleming, J. B.

In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, Vol. 18, No. 5, 05.2004, p. 852-856.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wilkiemeyer, M. B. ; Bieligk, S. C. ; Ashfaq, R. ; Jones, D. B. ; Rege, Robert V ; Fleming, J. B. / Laparoscopy alone is superior to peritoneal cytology in staging gastric and esophageal carcinoma. In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. 2004 ; Vol. 18, No. 5. pp. 852-856.
@article{88e710b184d14ef3873133ce4754d9a3,
title = "Laparoscopy alone is superior to peritoneal cytology in staging gastric and esophageal carcinoma",
abstract = "Background: Laparoscopy identifies metastatic disease in patients with upper gastrointestinal malignancies; however, it has been suggested that cytological examination of peritoneal washings may increase the diagnostic yield. We hypothesize that the addition of cytologic washings to a standardized staging laparoscopy is unnecessary for the identification of intraabdominal metastasis in patients with gastric/esophageal cancer. Methods: Forty patients with gastric/esophageal cancer were prospectively evaluated. Patients successfully underwent a diagnostic laparoscopy protocol (with biopsies) during which peritoneal washings were obtained and processed for cytologic analysis. Laparoscopic versus cytologic identification of intraabdominal metastasis were compared. Results: Forty patients successfully completed laparoscopy with collection of peritoneal washings. Laparoscopic examination of the peritoneal cavity upstaged 21 (52.5{\%}) patients. Laparoscopic examination consistently identified a statistically significant higher number of positive patients than cytologic examination of peritoneal washings (p = 0.001) and examination of cytologic washings alone failed to identify 45{\%} of patients with positive findings and laparoscopy. The addition of cytologic examination added no additional stage IV patients to the laparoscopy-negative group. Conclusion: A standardized laparoscopic examination alone is sufficient for the identification of intraabdominal metastatic disease in patients with gastric and esophageal cancer.",
keywords = "Esophageal cancer, Gastric cancer, Peritoneal cytology, Staging laparoscopy",
author = "Wilkiemeyer, {M. B.} and Bieligk, {S. C.} and R. Ashfaq and Jones, {D. B.} and Rege, {Robert V} and Fleming, {J. B.}",
year = "2004",
month = "5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "852--856",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopy alone is superior to peritoneal cytology in staging gastric and esophageal carcinoma

AU - Wilkiemeyer, M. B.

AU - Bieligk, S. C.

AU - Ashfaq, R.

AU - Jones, D. B.

AU - Rege, Robert V

AU - Fleming, J. B.

PY - 2004/5

Y1 - 2004/5

N2 - Background: Laparoscopy identifies metastatic disease in patients with upper gastrointestinal malignancies; however, it has been suggested that cytological examination of peritoneal washings may increase the diagnostic yield. We hypothesize that the addition of cytologic washings to a standardized staging laparoscopy is unnecessary for the identification of intraabdominal metastasis in patients with gastric/esophageal cancer. Methods: Forty patients with gastric/esophageal cancer were prospectively evaluated. Patients successfully underwent a diagnostic laparoscopy protocol (with biopsies) during which peritoneal washings were obtained and processed for cytologic analysis. Laparoscopic versus cytologic identification of intraabdominal metastasis were compared. Results: Forty patients successfully completed laparoscopy with collection of peritoneal washings. Laparoscopic examination of the peritoneal cavity upstaged 21 (52.5%) patients. Laparoscopic examination consistently identified a statistically significant higher number of positive patients than cytologic examination of peritoneal washings (p = 0.001) and examination of cytologic washings alone failed to identify 45% of patients with positive findings and laparoscopy. The addition of cytologic examination added no additional stage IV patients to the laparoscopy-negative group. Conclusion: A standardized laparoscopic examination alone is sufficient for the identification of intraabdominal metastatic disease in patients with gastric and esophageal cancer.

AB - Background: Laparoscopy identifies metastatic disease in patients with upper gastrointestinal malignancies; however, it has been suggested that cytological examination of peritoneal washings may increase the diagnostic yield. We hypothesize that the addition of cytologic washings to a standardized staging laparoscopy is unnecessary for the identification of intraabdominal metastasis in patients with gastric/esophageal cancer. Methods: Forty patients with gastric/esophageal cancer were prospectively evaluated. Patients successfully underwent a diagnostic laparoscopy protocol (with biopsies) during which peritoneal washings were obtained and processed for cytologic analysis. Laparoscopic versus cytologic identification of intraabdominal metastasis were compared. Results: Forty patients successfully completed laparoscopy with collection of peritoneal washings. Laparoscopic examination of the peritoneal cavity upstaged 21 (52.5%) patients. Laparoscopic examination consistently identified a statistically significant higher number of positive patients than cytologic examination of peritoneal washings (p = 0.001) and examination of cytologic washings alone failed to identify 45% of patients with positive findings and laparoscopy. The addition of cytologic examination added no additional stage IV patients to the laparoscopy-negative group. Conclusion: A standardized laparoscopic examination alone is sufficient for the identification of intraabdominal metastatic disease in patients with gastric and esophageal cancer.

KW - Esophageal cancer

KW - Gastric cancer

KW - Peritoneal cytology

KW - Staging laparoscopy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2442507668&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2442507668&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15054656

AN - SCOPUS:2442507668

VL - 18

SP - 852

EP - 856

JO - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

JF - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 5

ER -