Lay rescuer automated external defibrillator ("public access defibrillation") programs: Lessons learned from an international multicenter trial advisory statement from the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Committee; the Council on Cardiopulmonary, Perioperative, and Critical Care; and the Council on Clinical Cardiology

Mary F. Hazinski, Ahamed H. Idris, Richard E. Kerber, Andrew Epstein, Dianne Atkins, Wanchun Tang, Keith Lurie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

98 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Lay rescuer automated external defibrillator (AED) programs may increase the number of people experiencing sudden cardiac arrest who receive bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), can reduce time to defibrillation, and may improve survival from sudden cardiac arrest. These programs require an organized and practiced response, with rescuers trained and equipped to recognize emergencies, activate the emergency medical services system, provide CPR, and provide defibrillation. To determine the effect of public access defibrillation (PAD) programs on survival and other outcomes after SCA, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the American Heart Association (AHA), and others funded a large prospective randomized trial. The results of this study were recently published in The New England Journal of Medicine and support current AHA recommendations for lay rescuer AED programs and emphasis on planning, training, and practice of CPR and use of AEDs. The purpose of this statement is to highlight important findings of the Public Access Defibrillation Trial and summarize implications of these findings for healthcare providers, healthcare policy advocates, and the AHA training network.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3336-3340
Number of pages5
JournalCirculation
Volume111
Issue number24
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 21 2005

Fingerprint

Perioperative Care
Defibrillators
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Critical Care
Cardiology
Multicenter Studies
American Heart Association
Emergencies
Sudden Cardiac Death
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U.S.)
New England
Emergency Medical Services
Health Personnel
Medicine
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • AHA Science Advisory
  • Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
  • Defibrillation
  • Fibrillation
  • Heart arrest

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

@article{64451e18f87d492198c1295ade0c622b,
title = "Lay rescuer automated external defibrillator ({"}public access defibrillation{"}) programs: Lessons learned from an international multicenter trial advisory statement from the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Committee; the Council on Cardiopulmonary, Perioperative, and Critical Care; and the Council on Clinical Cardiology",
abstract = "Lay rescuer automated external defibrillator (AED) programs may increase the number of people experiencing sudden cardiac arrest who receive bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), can reduce time to defibrillation, and may improve survival from sudden cardiac arrest. These programs require an organized and practiced response, with rescuers trained and equipped to recognize emergencies, activate the emergency medical services system, provide CPR, and provide defibrillation. To determine the effect of public access defibrillation (PAD) programs on survival and other outcomes after SCA, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the American Heart Association (AHA), and others funded a large prospective randomized trial. The results of this study were recently published in The New England Journal of Medicine and support current AHA recommendations for lay rescuer AED programs and emphasis on planning, training, and practice of CPR and use of AEDs. The purpose of this statement is to highlight important findings of the Public Access Defibrillation Trial and summarize implications of these findings for healthcare providers, healthcare policy advocates, and the AHA training network.",
keywords = "AHA Science Advisory, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Defibrillation, Fibrillation, Heart arrest",
author = "Hazinski, {Mary F.} and Idris, {Ahamed H.} and Kerber, {Richard E.} and Andrew Epstein and Dianne Atkins and Wanchun Tang and Keith Lurie",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.165674",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "111",
pages = "3336--3340",
journal = "Circulation",
issn = "0009-7322",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "24",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lay rescuer automated external defibrillator ("public access defibrillation") programs

T2 - Lessons learned from an international multicenter trial advisory statement from the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Committee; the Council on Cardiopulmonary, Perioperative, and Critical Care; and the Council on Clinical Cardiology

AU - Hazinski, Mary F.

AU - Idris, Ahamed H.

AU - Kerber, Richard E.

AU - Epstein, Andrew

AU - Atkins, Dianne

AU - Tang, Wanchun

AU - Lurie, Keith

PY - 2005/6/21

Y1 - 2005/6/21

N2 - Lay rescuer automated external defibrillator (AED) programs may increase the number of people experiencing sudden cardiac arrest who receive bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), can reduce time to defibrillation, and may improve survival from sudden cardiac arrest. These programs require an organized and practiced response, with rescuers trained and equipped to recognize emergencies, activate the emergency medical services system, provide CPR, and provide defibrillation. To determine the effect of public access defibrillation (PAD) programs on survival and other outcomes after SCA, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the American Heart Association (AHA), and others funded a large prospective randomized trial. The results of this study were recently published in The New England Journal of Medicine and support current AHA recommendations for lay rescuer AED programs and emphasis on planning, training, and practice of CPR and use of AEDs. The purpose of this statement is to highlight important findings of the Public Access Defibrillation Trial and summarize implications of these findings for healthcare providers, healthcare policy advocates, and the AHA training network.

AB - Lay rescuer automated external defibrillator (AED) programs may increase the number of people experiencing sudden cardiac arrest who receive bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), can reduce time to defibrillation, and may improve survival from sudden cardiac arrest. These programs require an organized and practiced response, with rescuers trained and equipped to recognize emergencies, activate the emergency medical services system, provide CPR, and provide defibrillation. To determine the effect of public access defibrillation (PAD) programs on survival and other outcomes after SCA, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the American Heart Association (AHA), and others funded a large prospective randomized trial. The results of this study were recently published in The New England Journal of Medicine and support current AHA recommendations for lay rescuer AED programs and emphasis on planning, training, and practice of CPR and use of AEDs. The purpose of this statement is to highlight important findings of the Public Access Defibrillation Trial and summarize implications of these findings for healthcare providers, healthcare policy advocates, and the AHA training network.

KW - AHA Science Advisory

KW - Cardiopulmonary resuscitation

KW - Defibrillation

KW - Fibrillation

KW - Heart arrest

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21144457262&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21144457262&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.165674

DO - 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.165674

M3 - Article

C2 - 15967864

AN - SCOPUS:21144457262

VL - 111

SP - 3336

EP - 3340

JO - Circulation

JF - Circulation

SN - 0009-7322

IS - 24

ER -