Laypersons' responses to the communication of uncertainty regarding cancer risk estimates

Paul K J Han, William M P Klein, Thomas C. Lehman, Holly Massett, Simon C. Lee, Andrew N. Freedman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To explore laypersons' responses to the communication of uncertainty associated with individualized cancer risk estimates and to identify reasons for individual differences in these responses. Design. A qualitative study was conducted using focus groups. Participants were informed about a new colorectal cancer risk prediction model, and presented with hypothetical individualized risk estimates using presentation formats varying in expressed uncertainty (range v. point estimate). Semistructured interviews explored participants' responses to this information. Participants and Setting. Eight focus groups were conducted with 48 adults aged 50 to 74 residing in 2 major US metropolitan areas, Chicago, IL and Washington, DC. Purposive sampling was used to recruit participants with a high school or greater education, some familiarity with information technology, and no personal or immediate family history of cancer. Results. Participants identified several sources of uncertainty regarding cancer risk estimates, including missing data, limitations in accuracy and source credibility, and conflicting information. In comparing presentation formats, most participants reported greater worry and perceived risk with the range than with the point estimate, consistent with the phenomenon of ''ambiguity aversion.'' However, others reported the opposite effect or else indifference between formats. Reasons suggested by participants' responses included individual differences in optimism and motivations to reduce feelings of vulnerability and personal lack of control. Perceptions of source credibility and risk mutability emerged as potential mediating factors. Conclusions. Laypersons' responses to the communication of uncertainty regarding cancer risk estimates differ, and include both heightened and diminished risk perceptions. These differences may be attributable to personality, cognitive, and motivational factors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)391-403
Number of pages13
JournalMedical Decision Making
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2009

Fingerprint

Uncertainty
Communication
Neoplasms
Focus Groups
Individuality
Personality
Motivation
Colorectal Neoplasms
Emotions
Interviews
Technology
Education

Keywords

  • Ambiguity
  • Cancer
  • Risk
  • Risk prediction models
  • Uncertainty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Laypersons' responses to the communication of uncertainty regarding cancer risk estimates. / Han, Paul K J; Klein, William M P; Lehman, Thomas C.; Massett, Holly; Lee, Simon C.; Freedman, Andrew N.

In: Medical Decision Making, Vol. 29, No. 3, 05.2009, p. 391-403.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Han, Paul K J ; Klein, William M P ; Lehman, Thomas C. ; Massett, Holly ; Lee, Simon C. ; Freedman, Andrew N. / Laypersons' responses to the communication of uncertainty regarding cancer risk estimates. In: Medical Decision Making. 2009 ; Vol. 29, No. 3. pp. 391-403.
@article{b0ddf7b47fd546098eae9b2d10660a25,
title = "Laypersons' responses to the communication of uncertainty regarding cancer risk estimates",
abstract = "Objective. To explore laypersons' responses to the communication of uncertainty associated with individualized cancer risk estimates and to identify reasons for individual differences in these responses. Design. A qualitative study was conducted using focus groups. Participants were informed about a new colorectal cancer risk prediction model, and presented with hypothetical individualized risk estimates using presentation formats varying in expressed uncertainty (range v. point estimate). Semistructured interviews explored participants' responses to this information. Participants and Setting. Eight focus groups were conducted with 48 adults aged 50 to 74 residing in 2 major US metropolitan areas, Chicago, IL and Washington, DC. Purposive sampling was used to recruit participants with a high school or greater education, some familiarity with information technology, and no personal or immediate family history of cancer. Results. Participants identified several sources of uncertainty regarding cancer risk estimates, including missing data, limitations in accuracy and source credibility, and conflicting information. In comparing presentation formats, most participants reported greater worry and perceived risk with the range than with the point estimate, consistent with the phenomenon of ''ambiguity aversion.'' However, others reported the opposite effect or else indifference between formats. Reasons suggested by participants' responses included individual differences in optimism and motivations to reduce feelings of vulnerability and personal lack of control. Perceptions of source credibility and risk mutability emerged as potential mediating factors. Conclusions. Laypersons' responses to the communication of uncertainty regarding cancer risk estimates differ, and include both heightened and diminished risk perceptions. These differences may be attributable to personality, cognitive, and motivational factors.",
keywords = "Ambiguity, Cancer, Risk, Risk prediction models, Uncertainty",
author = "Han, {Paul K J} and Klein, {William M P} and Lehman, {Thomas C.} and Holly Massett and Lee, {Simon C.} and Freedman, {Andrew N.}",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1177/0272989X08327396",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "391--403",
journal = "Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making",
issn = "0272-989X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laypersons' responses to the communication of uncertainty regarding cancer risk estimates

AU - Han, Paul K J

AU - Klein, William M P

AU - Lehman, Thomas C.

AU - Massett, Holly

AU - Lee, Simon C.

AU - Freedman, Andrew N.

PY - 2009/5

Y1 - 2009/5

N2 - Objective. To explore laypersons' responses to the communication of uncertainty associated with individualized cancer risk estimates and to identify reasons for individual differences in these responses. Design. A qualitative study was conducted using focus groups. Participants were informed about a new colorectal cancer risk prediction model, and presented with hypothetical individualized risk estimates using presentation formats varying in expressed uncertainty (range v. point estimate). Semistructured interviews explored participants' responses to this information. Participants and Setting. Eight focus groups were conducted with 48 adults aged 50 to 74 residing in 2 major US metropolitan areas, Chicago, IL and Washington, DC. Purposive sampling was used to recruit participants with a high school or greater education, some familiarity with information technology, and no personal or immediate family history of cancer. Results. Participants identified several sources of uncertainty regarding cancer risk estimates, including missing data, limitations in accuracy and source credibility, and conflicting information. In comparing presentation formats, most participants reported greater worry and perceived risk with the range than with the point estimate, consistent with the phenomenon of ''ambiguity aversion.'' However, others reported the opposite effect or else indifference between formats. Reasons suggested by participants' responses included individual differences in optimism and motivations to reduce feelings of vulnerability and personal lack of control. Perceptions of source credibility and risk mutability emerged as potential mediating factors. Conclusions. Laypersons' responses to the communication of uncertainty regarding cancer risk estimates differ, and include both heightened and diminished risk perceptions. These differences may be attributable to personality, cognitive, and motivational factors.

AB - Objective. To explore laypersons' responses to the communication of uncertainty associated with individualized cancer risk estimates and to identify reasons for individual differences in these responses. Design. A qualitative study was conducted using focus groups. Participants were informed about a new colorectal cancer risk prediction model, and presented with hypothetical individualized risk estimates using presentation formats varying in expressed uncertainty (range v. point estimate). Semistructured interviews explored participants' responses to this information. Participants and Setting. Eight focus groups were conducted with 48 adults aged 50 to 74 residing in 2 major US metropolitan areas, Chicago, IL and Washington, DC. Purposive sampling was used to recruit participants with a high school or greater education, some familiarity with information technology, and no personal or immediate family history of cancer. Results. Participants identified several sources of uncertainty regarding cancer risk estimates, including missing data, limitations in accuracy and source credibility, and conflicting information. In comparing presentation formats, most participants reported greater worry and perceived risk with the range than with the point estimate, consistent with the phenomenon of ''ambiguity aversion.'' However, others reported the opposite effect or else indifference between formats. Reasons suggested by participants' responses included individual differences in optimism and motivations to reduce feelings of vulnerability and personal lack of control. Perceptions of source credibility and risk mutability emerged as potential mediating factors. Conclusions. Laypersons' responses to the communication of uncertainty regarding cancer risk estimates differ, and include both heightened and diminished risk perceptions. These differences may be attributable to personality, cognitive, and motivational factors.

KW - Ambiguity

KW - Cancer

KW - Risk

KW - Risk prediction models

KW - Uncertainty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649195424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67649195424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0272989X08327396

DO - 10.1177/0272989X08327396

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 391

EP - 403

JO - Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making

JF - Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making

SN - 0272-989X

IS - 3

ER -