Legal and ethical implications of defining an optimum means of achieving unconsciousness in assisted dying

S. Sinmyee, V. J. Pandit, Juan M Pascual, A. Dahan, T. Heidegger, G. Kreienbühl, D. A. Lubarsky, J. J. Pandit

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A decision by a society to sanction assisted dying in any form should logically go hand-in-hand with defining the acceptable method(s). Assisted dying is legal in several countries and we have reviewed the methods commonly used, contrasting these with an analysis of capital punishment in the USA. We expected that, since a common humane aim is to achieve unconsciousness at the point of death, which then occurs rapidly without pain or distress, there might be a single technique being used. However, the considerable heterogeneity in methods suggests that an optimum method of achieving unconsciousness remains undefined. In voluntary assisted dying (in some US states and European countries), the common method to induce unconsciousness appears to be self-administered barbiturate ingestion, with death resulting slowly from asphyxia due to cardiorespiratory depression. Physician-administered injections (a combination of general anaesthetic and neuromuscular blockade) are an option in Dutch guidelines. Hypoxic methods involving helium rebreathing have also been reported. The method of capital punishment (USA) resembles the Dutch injection technique, but specific drugs, doses and monitoring employed vary. However, for all these forms of assisted dying, there appears to be a relatively high incidence of vomiting (up to 10%), prolongation of death (up to 7 days), and re-awakening from coma (up to 4%), constituting failure of unconsciousness. This raises a concern that some deaths may be inhumane, and we have used lessons from the most recent studies of accidental awareness during anaesthesia to describe an optimal means that could better achieve unconsciousness. We found that the very act of defining an ‘optimum’ itself has important implications for ethics and the law.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)630-637
Number of pages8
JournalAnaesthesia
Volume74
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2019

Fingerprint

Unconsciousness
Capital Punishment
Intraoperative Awareness
General Anesthetics
Helium
Neuromuscular Blockade
Injections
Drug Monitoring
Asphyxia
Coma
Ethics
Vomiting
Eating
Guidelines
Depression
Physicians
Pain
Incidence

Keywords

  • accidental awareness
  • assisted suicide
  • euthanasia
  • medical ethics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Sinmyee, S., Pandit, V. J., Pascual, J. M., Dahan, A., Heidegger, T., Kreienbühl, G., ... Pandit, J. J. (2019). Legal and ethical implications of defining an optimum means of achieving unconsciousness in assisted dying. Anaesthesia, 74(5), 630-637. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14532

Legal and ethical implications of defining an optimum means of achieving unconsciousness in assisted dying. / Sinmyee, S.; Pandit, V. J.; Pascual, Juan M; Dahan, A.; Heidegger, T.; Kreienbühl, G.; Lubarsky, D. A.; Pandit, J. J.

In: Anaesthesia, Vol. 74, No. 5, 01.05.2019, p. 630-637.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sinmyee, S, Pandit, VJ, Pascual, JM, Dahan, A, Heidegger, T, Kreienbühl, G, Lubarsky, DA & Pandit, JJ 2019, 'Legal and ethical implications of defining an optimum means of achieving unconsciousness in assisted dying', Anaesthesia, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 630-637. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14532
Sinmyee, S. ; Pandit, V. J. ; Pascual, Juan M ; Dahan, A. ; Heidegger, T. ; Kreienbühl, G. ; Lubarsky, D. A. ; Pandit, J. J. / Legal and ethical implications of defining an optimum means of achieving unconsciousness in assisted dying. In: Anaesthesia. 2019 ; Vol. 74, No. 5. pp. 630-637.
@article{9726f41b1aae4ed4a67d880321251c84,
title = "Legal and ethical implications of defining an optimum means of achieving unconsciousness in assisted dying",
abstract = "A decision by a society to sanction assisted dying in any form should logically go hand-in-hand with defining the acceptable method(s). Assisted dying is legal in several countries and we have reviewed the methods commonly used, contrasting these with an analysis of capital punishment in the USA. We expected that, since a common humane aim is to achieve unconsciousness at the point of death, which then occurs rapidly without pain or distress, there might be a single technique being used. However, the considerable heterogeneity in methods suggests that an optimum method of achieving unconsciousness remains undefined. In voluntary assisted dying (in some US states and European countries), the common method to induce unconsciousness appears to be self-administered barbiturate ingestion, with death resulting slowly from asphyxia due to cardiorespiratory depression. Physician-administered injections (a combination of general anaesthetic and neuromuscular blockade) are an option in Dutch guidelines. Hypoxic methods involving helium rebreathing have also been reported. The method of capital punishment (USA) resembles the Dutch injection technique, but specific drugs, doses and monitoring employed vary. However, for all these forms of assisted dying, there appears to be a relatively high incidence of vomiting (up to 10{\%}), prolongation of death (up to 7 days), and re-awakening from coma (up to 4{\%}), constituting failure of unconsciousness. This raises a concern that some deaths may be inhumane, and we have used lessons from the most recent studies of accidental awareness during anaesthesia to describe an optimal means that could better achieve unconsciousness. We found that the very act of defining an ‘optimum’ itself has important implications for ethics and the law.",
keywords = "accidental awareness, assisted suicide, euthanasia, medical ethics",
author = "S. Sinmyee and Pandit, {V. J.} and Pascual, {Juan M} and A. Dahan and T. Heidegger and G. Kreienb{\"u}hl and Lubarsky, {D. A.} and Pandit, {J. J.}",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/anae.14532",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "74",
pages = "630--637",
journal = "Anaesthesia",
issn = "0003-2409",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Legal and ethical implications of defining an optimum means of achieving unconsciousness in assisted dying

AU - Sinmyee, S.

AU - Pandit, V. J.

AU - Pascual, Juan M

AU - Dahan, A.

AU - Heidegger, T.

AU - Kreienbühl, G.

AU - Lubarsky, D. A.

AU - Pandit, J. J.

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - A decision by a society to sanction assisted dying in any form should logically go hand-in-hand with defining the acceptable method(s). Assisted dying is legal in several countries and we have reviewed the methods commonly used, contrasting these with an analysis of capital punishment in the USA. We expected that, since a common humane aim is to achieve unconsciousness at the point of death, which then occurs rapidly without pain or distress, there might be a single technique being used. However, the considerable heterogeneity in methods suggests that an optimum method of achieving unconsciousness remains undefined. In voluntary assisted dying (in some US states and European countries), the common method to induce unconsciousness appears to be self-administered barbiturate ingestion, with death resulting slowly from asphyxia due to cardiorespiratory depression. Physician-administered injections (a combination of general anaesthetic and neuromuscular blockade) are an option in Dutch guidelines. Hypoxic methods involving helium rebreathing have also been reported. The method of capital punishment (USA) resembles the Dutch injection technique, but specific drugs, doses and monitoring employed vary. However, for all these forms of assisted dying, there appears to be a relatively high incidence of vomiting (up to 10%), prolongation of death (up to 7 days), and re-awakening from coma (up to 4%), constituting failure of unconsciousness. This raises a concern that some deaths may be inhumane, and we have used lessons from the most recent studies of accidental awareness during anaesthesia to describe an optimal means that could better achieve unconsciousness. We found that the very act of defining an ‘optimum’ itself has important implications for ethics and the law.

AB - A decision by a society to sanction assisted dying in any form should logically go hand-in-hand with defining the acceptable method(s). Assisted dying is legal in several countries and we have reviewed the methods commonly used, contrasting these with an analysis of capital punishment in the USA. We expected that, since a common humane aim is to achieve unconsciousness at the point of death, which then occurs rapidly without pain or distress, there might be a single technique being used. However, the considerable heterogeneity in methods suggests that an optimum method of achieving unconsciousness remains undefined. In voluntary assisted dying (in some US states and European countries), the common method to induce unconsciousness appears to be self-administered barbiturate ingestion, with death resulting slowly from asphyxia due to cardiorespiratory depression. Physician-administered injections (a combination of general anaesthetic and neuromuscular blockade) are an option in Dutch guidelines. Hypoxic methods involving helium rebreathing have also been reported. The method of capital punishment (USA) resembles the Dutch injection technique, but specific drugs, doses and monitoring employed vary. However, for all these forms of assisted dying, there appears to be a relatively high incidence of vomiting (up to 10%), prolongation of death (up to 7 days), and re-awakening from coma (up to 4%), constituting failure of unconsciousness. This raises a concern that some deaths may be inhumane, and we have used lessons from the most recent studies of accidental awareness during anaesthesia to describe an optimal means that could better achieve unconsciousness. We found that the very act of defining an ‘optimum’ itself has important implications for ethics and the law.

KW - accidental awareness

KW - assisted suicide

KW - euthanasia

KW - medical ethics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061795809&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061795809&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/anae.14532

DO - 10.1111/anae.14532

M3 - Article

C2 - 30786320

AN - SCOPUS:85061795809

VL - 74

SP - 630

EP - 637

JO - Anaesthesia

JF - Anaesthesia

SN - 0003-2409

IS - 5

ER -