Legislative advocacy: Evaluation of a grand rounds intervention for pediatricians

Rachel Bensen, Heidi Roman, Melina Bersamin, Yi Lu, Sarah Horwitz, Lisa J. Chamberlain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the impact of a Grand Rounds Action Alert (GRAA) intervention on the behaviors, knowledge, and attitudes of pediatric grand rounds (GR) attendees; and to assess its acceptability. Methods A cross-sectional, quasi-experimental study was performed at a freestanding children's hospital. GRAA on child health legislative topics were presented in the first 2 minutes of the pediatric GR session as well as posted outside. Each session included an action item, such as writing/signing letters to elected officials or informational sheets with legislator contact information. Main outcome measures included self-reported behavior, advocacy knowledge, attitudes, and acceptability. Results One year after GRAA implementation, GR attendees with high exposure to the intervention were more likely to have written/signed a letter to a legislator compared to those with low/no exposure (60% vs 35%, P =.016). Those with high exposure were also more knowledgeable regarding financing of health care for low-income children (20% vs 5%, P =.027). Attitudes toward advocacy at baseline were positive: respondents agreed it is important to remain informed about (98%) and advocate for (94%) legislation favorable to children's health. Implementing this program was challenging, but the intervention was accepted favorably: 93% of respondents agreed that GRAA should continue. Conclusions GRAA facilitated participation in legislative advocacy behaviors while improving self-perceived knowledge of legislative issues relating to children's health. They were well received in a large tertiary children's hospital.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)181-185
Number of pages5
JournalAcademic Pediatrics
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Teaching Rounds
Pediatrics
Pediatricians
Legislation
Tertiary Care Centers
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • advocacy
  • education
  • grand rounds

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Legislative advocacy : Evaluation of a grand rounds intervention for pediatricians. / Bensen, Rachel; Roman, Heidi; Bersamin, Melina; Lu, Yi; Horwitz, Sarah; Chamberlain, Lisa J.

In: Academic Pediatrics, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2014, p. 181-185.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bensen, Rachel ; Roman, Heidi ; Bersamin, Melina ; Lu, Yi ; Horwitz, Sarah ; Chamberlain, Lisa J. / Legislative advocacy : Evaluation of a grand rounds intervention for pediatricians. In: Academic Pediatrics. 2014 ; Vol. 14, No. 2. pp. 181-185.
@article{602962764a134d739f6158b28f501d9c,
title = "Legislative advocacy: Evaluation of a grand rounds intervention for pediatricians",
abstract = "Objective To evaluate the impact of a Grand Rounds Action Alert (GRAA) intervention on the behaviors, knowledge, and attitudes of pediatric grand rounds (GR) attendees; and to assess its acceptability. Methods A cross-sectional, quasi-experimental study was performed at a freestanding children's hospital. GRAA on child health legislative topics were presented in the first 2 minutes of the pediatric GR session as well as posted outside. Each session included an action item, such as writing/signing letters to elected officials or informational sheets with legislator contact information. Main outcome measures included self-reported behavior, advocacy knowledge, attitudes, and acceptability. Results One year after GRAA implementation, GR attendees with high exposure to the intervention were more likely to have written/signed a letter to a legislator compared to those with low/no exposure (60{\%} vs 35{\%}, P =.016). Those with high exposure were also more knowledgeable regarding financing of health care for low-income children (20{\%} vs 5{\%}, P =.027). Attitudes toward advocacy at baseline were positive: respondents agreed it is important to remain informed about (98{\%}) and advocate for (94{\%}) legislation favorable to children's health. Implementing this program was challenging, but the intervention was accepted favorably: 93{\%} of respondents agreed that GRAA should continue. Conclusions GRAA facilitated participation in legislative advocacy behaviors while improving self-perceived knowledge of legislative issues relating to children's health. They were well received in a large tertiary children's hospital.",
keywords = "advocacy, education, grand rounds",
author = "Rachel Bensen and Heidi Roman and Melina Bersamin and Yi Lu and Sarah Horwitz and Chamberlain, {Lisa J.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.acap.2013.08.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "181--185",
journal = "Academic Pediatrics",
issn = "1876-2859",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Legislative advocacy

T2 - Evaluation of a grand rounds intervention for pediatricians

AU - Bensen, Rachel

AU - Roman, Heidi

AU - Bersamin, Melina

AU - Lu, Yi

AU - Horwitz, Sarah

AU - Chamberlain, Lisa J.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objective To evaluate the impact of a Grand Rounds Action Alert (GRAA) intervention on the behaviors, knowledge, and attitudes of pediatric grand rounds (GR) attendees; and to assess its acceptability. Methods A cross-sectional, quasi-experimental study was performed at a freestanding children's hospital. GRAA on child health legislative topics were presented in the first 2 minutes of the pediatric GR session as well as posted outside. Each session included an action item, such as writing/signing letters to elected officials or informational sheets with legislator contact information. Main outcome measures included self-reported behavior, advocacy knowledge, attitudes, and acceptability. Results One year after GRAA implementation, GR attendees with high exposure to the intervention were more likely to have written/signed a letter to a legislator compared to those with low/no exposure (60% vs 35%, P =.016). Those with high exposure were also more knowledgeable regarding financing of health care for low-income children (20% vs 5%, P =.027). Attitudes toward advocacy at baseline were positive: respondents agreed it is important to remain informed about (98%) and advocate for (94%) legislation favorable to children's health. Implementing this program was challenging, but the intervention was accepted favorably: 93% of respondents agreed that GRAA should continue. Conclusions GRAA facilitated participation in legislative advocacy behaviors while improving self-perceived knowledge of legislative issues relating to children's health. They were well received in a large tertiary children's hospital.

AB - Objective To evaluate the impact of a Grand Rounds Action Alert (GRAA) intervention on the behaviors, knowledge, and attitudes of pediatric grand rounds (GR) attendees; and to assess its acceptability. Methods A cross-sectional, quasi-experimental study was performed at a freestanding children's hospital. GRAA on child health legislative topics were presented in the first 2 minutes of the pediatric GR session as well as posted outside. Each session included an action item, such as writing/signing letters to elected officials or informational sheets with legislator contact information. Main outcome measures included self-reported behavior, advocacy knowledge, attitudes, and acceptability. Results One year after GRAA implementation, GR attendees with high exposure to the intervention were more likely to have written/signed a letter to a legislator compared to those with low/no exposure (60% vs 35%, P =.016). Those with high exposure were also more knowledgeable regarding financing of health care for low-income children (20% vs 5%, P =.027). Attitudes toward advocacy at baseline were positive: respondents agreed it is important to remain informed about (98%) and advocate for (94%) legislation favorable to children's health. Implementing this program was challenging, but the intervention was accepted favorably: 93% of respondents agreed that GRAA should continue. Conclusions GRAA facilitated participation in legislative advocacy behaviors while improving self-perceived knowledge of legislative issues relating to children's health. They were well received in a large tertiary children's hospital.

KW - advocacy

KW - education

KW - grand rounds

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84895560479&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84895560479&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.acap.2013.08.004

DO - 10.1016/j.acap.2013.08.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 24126045

AN - SCOPUS:84895560479

VL - 14

SP - 181

EP - 185

JO - Academic Pediatrics

JF - Academic Pediatrics

SN - 1876-2859

IS - 2

ER -