Lenke 1C, King Type II Curves: Surgical Recommendations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objectives of this article are twofold. The first is to discuss the surgical experience in patients who have Lenke 1C (King type II) curves, including the experience with newer instrumentation. These patients present a significant challenge to the deformity surgeon because they have structural thoracic deformities and significant, but nonstructural, lumbar curves. Over the years, selective instrumentation and fusion of the thoracic curve have been the primary approach to preserve motion of the lumbar segments, and thus, improve the long-term outlook. This strategy has been undertaken with the expectation that the uninstrumented lumbar curve will allow for a well-balanced spinal column postoperatively. The second objective of this article is to present basic strategies that may be helpful when planning for surgery in these patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)511-520
Number of pages10
JournalOrthopedic Clinics of North America
Volume38
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2007

Fingerprint

Thorax
Spine
Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Lenke 1C, King Type II Curves : Surgical Recommendations. / Richards, B. Stephens.

In: Orthopedic Clinics of North America, Vol. 38, No. 4, 10.2007, p. 511-520.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4b0009fab0be4bf68d86484e36ea5c57,
title = "Lenke 1C, King Type II Curves: Surgical Recommendations",
abstract = "The objectives of this article are twofold. The first is to discuss the surgical experience in patients who have Lenke 1C (King type II) curves, including the experience with newer instrumentation. These patients present a significant challenge to the deformity surgeon because they have structural thoracic deformities and significant, but nonstructural, lumbar curves. Over the years, selective instrumentation and fusion of the thoracic curve have been the primary approach to preserve motion of the lumbar segments, and thus, improve the long-term outlook. This strategy has been undertaken with the expectation that the uninstrumented lumbar curve will allow for a well-balanced spinal column postoperatively. The second objective of this article is to present basic strategies that may be helpful when planning for surgery in these patients.",
author = "Richards, {B. Stephens}",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.ocl.2007.05.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "511--520",
journal = "Orthopedic Clinics of North America",
issn = "0030-5898",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lenke 1C, King Type II Curves

T2 - Surgical Recommendations

AU - Richards, B. Stephens

PY - 2007/10

Y1 - 2007/10

N2 - The objectives of this article are twofold. The first is to discuss the surgical experience in patients who have Lenke 1C (King type II) curves, including the experience with newer instrumentation. These patients present a significant challenge to the deformity surgeon because they have structural thoracic deformities and significant, but nonstructural, lumbar curves. Over the years, selective instrumentation and fusion of the thoracic curve have been the primary approach to preserve motion of the lumbar segments, and thus, improve the long-term outlook. This strategy has been undertaken with the expectation that the uninstrumented lumbar curve will allow for a well-balanced spinal column postoperatively. The second objective of this article is to present basic strategies that may be helpful when planning for surgery in these patients.

AB - The objectives of this article are twofold. The first is to discuss the surgical experience in patients who have Lenke 1C (King type II) curves, including the experience with newer instrumentation. These patients present a significant challenge to the deformity surgeon because they have structural thoracic deformities and significant, but nonstructural, lumbar curves. Over the years, selective instrumentation and fusion of the thoracic curve have been the primary approach to preserve motion of the lumbar segments, and thus, improve the long-term outlook. This strategy has been undertaken with the expectation that the uninstrumented lumbar curve will allow for a well-balanced spinal column postoperatively. The second objective of this article is to present basic strategies that may be helpful when planning for surgery in these patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35248882939&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35248882939&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ocl.2007.05.004

DO - 10.1016/j.ocl.2007.05.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 17945130

AN - SCOPUS:35248882939

VL - 38

SP - 511

EP - 520

JO - Orthopedic Clinics of North America

JF - Orthopedic Clinics of North America

SN - 0030-5898

IS - 4

ER -