Lenticulostriate vasculopathy in neonates: Is it a marker of cerebral insult? Critical review of the literature

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although lenticulostriate vasculopathy (LSV) was recognized nearly 30. years ago, neonatologists and radiologists still question its clinical significance. The diagnosis of LSV may be highly subjective, resulting in many false negatives when the radiologist is not familiar with the lesion or false positive if over-read by those with special interest in this finding. There has been an increase in incidence of LSV since its recognition in 1985 which might reflect nothing more than a growing awareness of this finding on neonatal cranial ultrasound. On the other hand, improved ultrasound imaging technology may have enhanced identification of LSV. Prospective studies evaluating the presence, significance and diagnosis of LSV are limited and have produced conflicting results. Therefore, the associated risk factors and clinical relevance of LSV on cranial ultrasound remain unclear. This review will examine the existing literature.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)423-426
Number of pages4
JournalEarly Human Development
Volume91
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2015

Fingerprint

Basal Ganglia Cerebrovascular Disease
Newborn Infant
Ultrasonography
Prospective Studies
Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

@article{b3fccaf1411946da967533a155a0e333,
title = "Lenticulostriate vasculopathy in neonates: Is it a marker of cerebral insult? Critical review of the literature",
abstract = "Although lenticulostriate vasculopathy (LSV) was recognized nearly 30. years ago, neonatologists and radiologists still question its clinical significance. The diagnosis of LSV may be highly subjective, resulting in many false negatives when the radiologist is not familiar with the lesion or false positive if over-read by those with special interest in this finding. There has been an increase in incidence of LSV since its recognition in 1985 which might reflect nothing more than a growing awareness of this finding on neonatal cranial ultrasound. On the other hand, improved ultrasound imaging technology may have enhanced identification of LSV. Prospective studies evaluating the presence, significance and diagnosis of LSV are limited and have produced conflicting results. Therefore, the associated risk factors and clinical relevance of LSV on cranial ultrasound remain unclear. This review will examine the existing literature.",
author = "Julide Sisman and Rosenfeld, {Charles R.}",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2015.04.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "91",
pages = "423--426",
journal = "Early Human Development",
issn = "0378-3782",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lenticulostriate vasculopathy in neonates

T2 - Is it a marker of cerebral insult? Critical review of the literature

AU - Sisman, Julide

AU - Rosenfeld, Charles R.

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - Although lenticulostriate vasculopathy (LSV) was recognized nearly 30. years ago, neonatologists and radiologists still question its clinical significance. The diagnosis of LSV may be highly subjective, resulting in many false negatives when the radiologist is not familiar with the lesion or false positive if over-read by those with special interest in this finding. There has been an increase in incidence of LSV since its recognition in 1985 which might reflect nothing more than a growing awareness of this finding on neonatal cranial ultrasound. On the other hand, improved ultrasound imaging technology may have enhanced identification of LSV. Prospective studies evaluating the presence, significance and diagnosis of LSV are limited and have produced conflicting results. Therefore, the associated risk factors and clinical relevance of LSV on cranial ultrasound remain unclear. This review will examine the existing literature.

AB - Although lenticulostriate vasculopathy (LSV) was recognized nearly 30. years ago, neonatologists and radiologists still question its clinical significance. The diagnosis of LSV may be highly subjective, resulting in many false negatives when the radiologist is not familiar with the lesion or false positive if over-read by those with special interest in this finding. There has been an increase in incidence of LSV since its recognition in 1985 which might reflect nothing more than a growing awareness of this finding on neonatal cranial ultrasound. On the other hand, improved ultrasound imaging technology may have enhanced identification of LSV. Prospective studies evaluating the presence, significance and diagnosis of LSV are limited and have produced conflicting results. Therefore, the associated risk factors and clinical relevance of LSV on cranial ultrasound remain unclear. This review will examine the existing literature.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930179330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930179330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2015.04.004

DO - 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2015.04.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 25939999

AN - SCOPUS:84930179330

VL - 91

SP - 423

EP - 426

JO - Early Human Development

JF - Early Human Development

SN - 0378-3782

IS - 7

ER -