Lessons from a patient experience survey in a randomized surgical trial of treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women

Philippe E. Zimmern, Kimberly J. Dandreo, Larry Sirls, Alice Howell, Lynn Hall, Judy Gruss, Kathy Jesse, Tamara Dickinson, Caren Prather

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis To understand the patient burden of study procedures/measures at completion of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) requiring extensive testing and follow-up visits. Methods A survey sent after completing the 2-year visit of an RCT comparing Burch colposuspension and fascial retropubic sling to treat stress urinary incontinence assessed degree of bother for seven study procedures, eight studyrelated factors, and possible motivations to participate in the study. Results A total of 450 study participants (88%) returned the survey. Urodynamic testing was the most bothersome procedure, followed by 24-h pad test and Q-tip test. Selfadministered questionnaires were the least bothersome. Main reasons to participate in the study were to help others, obtain better knowledge about the condition, and be guided by a committed team of investigators/study coordinators. Conclusions At the end of a large multicenter RCT, we learned from a confidential patient survey that the most burdensome activities involved invasive procedures, frequent visits, and multiple forms to fill out.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1273-1278
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
Volume22
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2011

Fingerprint

Stress Urinary Incontinence
Randomized Controlled Trials
Urodynamics
Therapeutics
Research Personnel
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Outcome measures
  • Patient survey
  • Stress incontinence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Lessons from a patient experience survey in a randomized surgical trial of treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. / Zimmern, Philippe E.; Dandreo, Kimberly J.; Sirls, Larry; Howell, Alice; Hall, Lynn; Gruss, Judy; Jesse, Kathy; Dickinson, Tamara; Prather, Caren.

In: International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, Vol. 22, No. 10, 10.2011, p. 1273-1278.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zimmern, Philippe E. ; Dandreo, Kimberly J. ; Sirls, Larry ; Howell, Alice ; Hall, Lynn ; Gruss, Judy ; Jesse, Kathy ; Dickinson, Tamara ; Prather, Caren. / Lessons from a patient experience survey in a randomized surgical trial of treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. In: International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. 2011 ; Vol. 22, No. 10. pp. 1273-1278.
@article{a04b7c89f5f14b788c0313dac2a1a59b,
title = "Lessons from a patient experience survey in a randomized surgical trial of treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women",
abstract = "Introduction and hypothesis To understand the patient burden of study procedures/measures at completion of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) requiring extensive testing and follow-up visits. Methods A survey sent after completing the 2-year visit of an RCT comparing Burch colposuspension and fascial retropubic sling to treat stress urinary incontinence assessed degree of bother for seven study procedures, eight studyrelated factors, and possible motivations to participate in the study. Results A total of 450 study participants (88{\%}) returned the survey. Urodynamic testing was the most bothersome procedure, followed by 24-h pad test and Q-tip test. Selfadministered questionnaires were the least bothersome. Main reasons to participate in the study were to help others, obtain better knowledge about the condition, and be guided by a committed team of investigators/study coordinators. Conclusions At the end of a large multicenter RCT, we learned from a confidential patient survey that the most burdensome activities involved invasive procedures, frequent visits, and multiple forms to fill out.",
keywords = "Outcome measures, Patient survey, Stress incontinence",
author = "Zimmern, {Philippe E.} and Dandreo, {Kimberly J.} and Larry Sirls and Alice Howell and Lynn Hall and Judy Gruss and Kathy Jesse and Tamara Dickinson and Caren Prather",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1007/s00192-011-1507-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "1273--1278",
journal = "International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction",
issn = "0937-3462",
publisher = "Springer London",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lessons from a patient experience survey in a randomized surgical trial of treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women

AU - Zimmern, Philippe E.

AU - Dandreo, Kimberly J.

AU - Sirls, Larry

AU - Howell, Alice

AU - Hall, Lynn

AU - Gruss, Judy

AU - Jesse, Kathy

AU - Dickinson, Tamara

AU - Prather, Caren

PY - 2011/10

Y1 - 2011/10

N2 - Introduction and hypothesis To understand the patient burden of study procedures/measures at completion of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) requiring extensive testing and follow-up visits. Methods A survey sent after completing the 2-year visit of an RCT comparing Burch colposuspension and fascial retropubic sling to treat stress urinary incontinence assessed degree of bother for seven study procedures, eight studyrelated factors, and possible motivations to participate in the study. Results A total of 450 study participants (88%) returned the survey. Urodynamic testing was the most bothersome procedure, followed by 24-h pad test and Q-tip test. Selfadministered questionnaires were the least bothersome. Main reasons to participate in the study were to help others, obtain better knowledge about the condition, and be guided by a committed team of investigators/study coordinators. Conclusions At the end of a large multicenter RCT, we learned from a confidential patient survey that the most burdensome activities involved invasive procedures, frequent visits, and multiple forms to fill out.

AB - Introduction and hypothesis To understand the patient burden of study procedures/measures at completion of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) requiring extensive testing and follow-up visits. Methods A survey sent after completing the 2-year visit of an RCT comparing Burch colposuspension and fascial retropubic sling to treat stress urinary incontinence assessed degree of bother for seven study procedures, eight studyrelated factors, and possible motivations to participate in the study. Results A total of 450 study participants (88%) returned the survey. Urodynamic testing was the most bothersome procedure, followed by 24-h pad test and Q-tip test. Selfadministered questionnaires were the least bothersome. Main reasons to participate in the study were to help others, obtain better knowledge about the condition, and be guided by a committed team of investigators/study coordinators. Conclusions At the end of a large multicenter RCT, we learned from a confidential patient survey that the most burdensome activities involved invasive procedures, frequent visits, and multiple forms to fill out.

KW - Outcome measures

KW - Patient survey

KW - Stress incontinence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855216727&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855216727&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00192-011-1507-z

DO - 10.1007/s00192-011-1507-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 21789658

AN - SCOPUS:84855216727

VL - 22

SP - 1273

EP - 1278

JO - International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

JF - International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

SN - 0937-3462

IS - 10

ER -