Limited impact of a multicenter intervention to improve the quality and efficiency of pneumonia care

Ethan A. Halm, Carol Horowitz, Alan Silver, Alan Fein, Yosef D. Dlugacz, Bruce Hirsch, Mark R. Chassin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study objectives: To evaluate the impact of a multifactorial intervention to improve the quality, efficiency, and patient understanding of care for community-acquired pneumonia. Design: Times series cohort study. Setting: Four academic health centers in the New York City metropolitan area. Patients or participants: All consecutive adults hospitalized for pneumonia during a 5-month period before (n = 1,013) and after (n = 1,081) implementation of an inpatient quality improvement (QI) initiative. Interventions: A multidisciplinary team of opinion leaders developed evidence-based treatment guidelines and critical pathways, conducted educational sessions with physicians, distributed pocket reminder cards, promoted standardized orders, and developed bilingual patient education materials. Measurements and results: The average age was 71.4 years, and 44.1% of cases were low risk, 36.8% were moderate risk, and 19.2% were high risk. The preintervention and postintervention groups were well matched on age, sex, race, nursing home residence, pneumonia severity, initial presentation, and most major comorbidities. The intervention increased the use of guideline-recommended antimicrobial therapy from 78.1 to 83.4% (p = 0.003). There was also a borderline decrease in the proportion of patients being discharged prior to becoming clinically stable, from 27.0 to 23.5% (p = 0.06). However, there were no improvements in the other targeted indicators, including time to first dose of antibiotics, proportion receiving antibiotics within 8 h, timely switch to oral antibiotics, timely discharge, length of stay, or patient education outcomes. Conclusions: This real-world QI program was able to improve modestly on some quality indicators, but not effect resource use or patient knowledge of their disease. Changing physician and organizational behavior in academic health centers will require the development and implementation of more intensive, system-oriented strategies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)100-107
Number of pages8
JournalChest
Volume126
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2004

Fingerprint

Pneumonia
Patient Education
Quality Improvement
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Guidelines
Physicians
Critical Pathways
Health
Nursing Homes
Comorbidity
Inpatients
Length of Stay
Patient Care
Cohort Studies
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Antibiotic therapy
  • Guidelines
  • Outcomes
  • Pneumonia
  • Quality improvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Halm, E. A., Horowitz, C., Silver, A., Fein, A., Dlugacz, Y. D., Hirsch, B., & Chassin, M. R. (2004). Limited impact of a multicenter intervention to improve the quality and efficiency of pneumonia care. Chest, 126(1), 100-107. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.126.1.100

Limited impact of a multicenter intervention to improve the quality and efficiency of pneumonia care. / Halm, Ethan A.; Horowitz, Carol; Silver, Alan; Fein, Alan; Dlugacz, Yosef D.; Hirsch, Bruce; Chassin, Mark R.

In: Chest, Vol. 126, No. 1, 07.2004, p. 100-107.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Halm, EA, Horowitz, C, Silver, A, Fein, A, Dlugacz, YD, Hirsch, B & Chassin, MR 2004, 'Limited impact of a multicenter intervention to improve the quality and efficiency of pneumonia care', Chest, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 100-107. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.126.1.100
Halm, Ethan A. ; Horowitz, Carol ; Silver, Alan ; Fein, Alan ; Dlugacz, Yosef D. ; Hirsch, Bruce ; Chassin, Mark R. / Limited impact of a multicenter intervention to improve the quality and efficiency of pneumonia care. In: Chest. 2004 ; Vol. 126, No. 1. pp. 100-107.
@article{897c5089c1604175a505d8c98e049a7d,
title = "Limited impact of a multicenter intervention to improve the quality and efficiency of pneumonia care",
abstract = "Study objectives: To evaluate the impact of a multifactorial intervention to improve the quality, efficiency, and patient understanding of care for community-acquired pneumonia. Design: Times series cohort study. Setting: Four academic health centers in the New York City metropolitan area. Patients or participants: All consecutive adults hospitalized for pneumonia during a 5-month period before (n = 1,013) and after (n = 1,081) implementation of an inpatient quality improvement (QI) initiative. Interventions: A multidisciplinary team of opinion leaders developed evidence-based treatment guidelines and critical pathways, conducted educational sessions with physicians, distributed pocket reminder cards, promoted standardized orders, and developed bilingual patient education materials. Measurements and results: The average age was 71.4 years, and 44.1{\%} of cases were low risk, 36.8{\%} were moderate risk, and 19.2{\%} were high risk. The preintervention and postintervention groups were well matched on age, sex, race, nursing home residence, pneumonia severity, initial presentation, and most major comorbidities. The intervention increased the use of guideline-recommended antimicrobial therapy from 78.1 to 83.4{\%} (p = 0.003). There was also a borderline decrease in the proportion of patients being discharged prior to becoming clinically stable, from 27.0 to 23.5{\%} (p = 0.06). However, there were no improvements in the other targeted indicators, including time to first dose of antibiotics, proportion receiving antibiotics within 8 h, timely switch to oral antibiotics, timely discharge, length of stay, or patient education outcomes. Conclusions: This real-world QI program was able to improve modestly on some quality indicators, but not effect resource use or patient knowledge of their disease. Changing physician and organizational behavior in academic health centers will require the development and implementation of more intensive, system-oriented strategies.",
keywords = "Antibiotic therapy, Guidelines, Outcomes, Pneumonia, Quality improvement",
author = "Halm, {Ethan A.} and Carol Horowitz and Alan Silver and Alan Fein and Dlugacz, {Yosef D.} and Bruce Hirsch and Chassin, {Mark R.}",
year = "2004",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1378/chest.126.1.100",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "126",
pages = "100--107",
journal = "Chest",
issn = "0012-3692",
publisher = "American College of Chest Physicians",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Limited impact of a multicenter intervention to improve the quality and efficiency of pneumonia care

AU - Halm, Ethan A.

AU - Horowitz, Carol

AU - Silver, Alan

AU - Fein, Alan

AU - Dlugacz, Yosef D.

AU - Hirsch, Bruce

AU - Chassin, Mark R.

PY - 2004/7

Y1 - 2004/7

N2 - Study objectives: To evaluate the impact of a multifactorial intervention to improve the quality, efficiency, and patient understanding of care for community-acquired pneumonia. Design: Times series cohort study. Setting: Four academic health centers in the New York City metropolitan area. Patients or participants: All consecutive adults hospitalized for pneumonia during a 5-month period before (n = 1,013) and after (n = 1,081) implementation of an inpatient quality improvement (QI) initiative. Interventions: A multidisciplinary team of opinion leaders developed evidence-based treatment guidelines and critical pathways, conducted educational sessions with physicians, distributed pocket reminder cards, promoted standardized orders, and developed bilingual patient education materials. Measurements and results: The average age was 71.4 years, and 44.1% of cases were low risk, 36.8% were moderate risk, and 19.2% were high risk. The preintervention and postintervention groups were well matched on age, sex, race, nursing home residence, pneumonia severity, initial presentation, and most major comorbidities. The intervention increased the use of guideline-recommended antimicrobial therapy from 78.1 to 83.4% (p = 0.003). There was also a borderline decrease in the proportion of patients being discharged prior to becoming clinically stable, from 27.0 to 23.5% (p = 0.06). However, there were no improvements in the other targeted indicators, including time to first dose of antibiotics, proportion receiving antibiotics within 8 h, timely switch to oral antibiotics, timely discharge, length of stay, or patient education outcomes. Conclusions: This real-world QI program was able to improve modestly on some quality indicators, but not effect resource use or patient knowledge of their disease. Changing physician and organizational behavior in academic health centers will require the development and implementation of more intensive, system-oriented strategies.

AB - Study objectives: To evaluate the impact of a multifactorial intervention to improve the quality, efficiency, and patient understanding of care for community-acquired pneumonia. Design: Times series cohort study. Setting: Four academic health centers in the New York City metropolitan area. Patients or participants: All consecutive adults hospitalized for pneumonia during a 5-month period before (n = 1,013) and after (n = 1,081) implementation of an inpatient quality improvement (QI) initiative. Interventions: A multidisciplinary team of opinion leaders developed evidence-based treatment guidelines and critical pathways, conducted educational sessions with physicians, distributed pocket reminder cards, promoted standardized orders, and developed bilingual patient education materials. Measurements and results: The average age was 71.4 years, and 44.1% of cases were low risk, 36.8% were moderate risk, and 19.2% were high risk. The preintervention and postintervention groups were well matched on age, sex, race, nursing home residence, pneumonia severity, initial presentation, and most major comorbidities. The intervention increased the use of guideline-recommended antimicrobial therapy from 78.1 to 83.4% (p = 0.003). There was also a borderline decrease in the proportion of patients being discharged prior to becoming clinically stable, from 27.0 to 23.5% (p = 0.06). However, there were no improvements in the other targeted indicators, including time to first dose of antibiotics, proportion receiving antibiotics within 8 h, timely switch to oral antibiotics, timely discharge, length of stay, or patient education outcomes. Conclusions: This real-world QI program was able to improve modestly on some quality indicators, but not effect resource use or patient knowledge of their disease. Changing physician and organizational behavior in academic health centers will require the development and implementation of more intensive, system-oriented strategies.

KW - Antibiotic therapy

KW - Guidelines

KW - Outcomes

KW - Pneumonia

KW - Quality improvement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3242698921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3242698921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1378/chest.126.1.100

DO - 10.1378/chest.126.1.100

M3 - Article

C2 - 15249449

AN - SCOPUS:3242698921

VL - 126

SP - 100

EP - 107

JO - Chest

JF - Chest

SN - 0012-3692

IS - 1

ER -