Liver transplantation in patients with multiple organ failures: Feasibility and outcomes

Paul J. Thuluvath, Avesh J. Thuluvath, Steven Hanish, Yulia Savva

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background & Aims: Multiple organ failures (OFs) are common in patients with cirrhosis, but the independent effect of the number or type of OFs on liver transplantation (LT) outcomes is not well defined. Method: United Network for Organ Sharing data were analyzed from 2002 to 2016 for all adults listed for LT who received an LT within 30 days after listing. We estimated post-LT survival stratified by number and type of pre-transplant OFs before and after adjusting for confounding variables. Results: During the study period, 4,714 (4.1%) patients died and 19,375 (16.6%) patients were transplanted within 30 days of listing. One or more OF were more common in those who were transplanted (57.4%) compared to those without LT (9.5%). The probability of staying alive more than 30 days on the waiting list without LT decreased with increasing number of OFs; while 90% were alive without OF, only 20% were alive with two OFs, and 2–8% with three or more OFs. The interval between listing and transplantation decreased with an increase in OFs, and the median time to transplant after listing was only 4–5 days with three or more OFs. Although the risk of post-LT mortality increased with increasing number of OFs, the 90-day patient survival was 90% and one-year survival was 81% in the presence of 5–6 OFs. The number of OFs was an independent predictor of survival, but the maximum difference in one-year graft or patient survival between those without OF and those with 5–6 OFs was only 9%. Additionally, the type of OF had minimal impact on outcomes. Conclusions: Liver transplantation is feasible with excellent outcomes, even in the presence of five or six OFs. Lay summary: Multiple organ failures, ranging from 1–6, are common in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis. The survival without liver transplant is dismal in the presence of three or more organ failures. Small retrospective studies have shown that liver transplant is feasible with good outcomes even in the presence of multiple organ failures. In this study, using a large national dataset, we show that survival chances for more than 30 days in those with three or more organ failures are less than 8%. However, if a liver transplant is performed quickly, the survival chances are very high with one-year survival ranging from 84% with three organ failures to 81% with 5–6 organ failures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1047-1056
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Hepatology
Volume69
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Multiple Organ Failure
Liver Transplantation
Survival
Transplants
Liver
Fibrosis
Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)
Waiting Lists
Information Dissemination
Retrospective Studies
Transplantation
Mortality

Keywords

  • Liver transplant
  • Organ failure
  • Survival outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology

Cite this

Liver transplantation in patients with multiple organ failures : Feasibility and outcomes. / Thuluvath, Paul J.; Thuluvath, Avesh J.; Hanish, Steven; Savva, Yulia.

In: Journal of Hepatology, Vol. 69, No. 5, 11.2018, p. 1047-1056.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Thuluvath, Paul J. ; Thuluvath, Avesh J. ; Hanish, Steven ; Savva, Yulia. / Liver transplantation in patients with multiple organ failures : Feasibility and outcomes. In: Journal of Hepatology. 2018 ; Vol. 69, No. 5. pp. 1047-1056.
@article{bdd555f20241482fa8720eac6d77ccaa,
title = "Liver transplantation in patients with multiple organ failures: Feasibility and outcomes",
abstract = "Background & Aims: Multiple organ failures (OFs) are common in patients with cirrhosis, but the independent effect of the number or type of OFs on liver transplantation (LT) outcomes is not well defined. Method: United Network for Organ Sharing data were analyzed from 2002 to 2016 for all adults listed for LT who received an LT within 30 days after listing. We estimated post-LT survival stratified by number and type of pre-transplant OFs before and after adjusting for confounding variables. Results: During the study period, 4,714 (4.1{\%}) patients died and 19,375 (16.6{\%}) patients were transplanted within 30 days of listing. One or more OF were more common in those who were transplanted (57.4{\%}) compared to those without LT (9.5{\%}). The probability of staying alive more than 30 days on the waiting list without LT decreased with increasing number of OFs; while 90{\%} were alive without OF, only 20{\%} were alive with two OFs, and 2–8{\%} with three or more OFs. The interval between listing and transplantation decreased with an increase in OFs, and the median time to transplant after listing was only 4–5 days with three or more OFs. Although the risk of post-LT mortality increased with increasing number of OFs, the 90-day patient survival was 90{\%} and one-year survival was 81{\%} in the presence of 5–6 OFs. The number of OFs was an independent predictor of survival, but the maximum difference in one-year graft or patient survival between those without OF and those with 5–6 OFs was only 9{\%}. Additionally, the type of OF had minimal impact on outcomes. Conclusions: Liver transplantation is feasible with excellent outcomes, even in the presence of five or six OFs. Lay summary: Multiple organ failures, ranging from 1–6, are common in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis. The survival without liver transplant is dismal in the presence of three or more organ failures. Small retrospective studies have shown that liver transplant is feasible with good outcomes even in the presence of multiple organ failures. In this study, using a large national dataset, we show that survival chances for more than 30 days in those with three or more organ failures are less than 8{\%}. However, if a liver transplant is performed quickly, the survival chances are very high with one-year survival ranging from 84{\%} with three organ failures to 81{\%} with 5–6 organ failures.",
keywords = "Liver transplant, Organ failure, Survival outcomes",
author = "Thuluvath, {Paul J.} and Thuluvath, {Avesh J.} and Steven Hanish and Yulia Savva",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhep.2018.07.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "1047--1056",
journal = "Journal of Hepatology",
issn = "0168-8278",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Liver transplantation in patients with multiple organ failures

T2 - Feasibility and outcomes

AU - Thuluvath, Paul J.

AU - Thuluvath, Avesh J.

AU - Hanish, Steven

AU - Savva, Yulia

PY - 2018/11

Y1 - 2018/11

N2 - Background & Aims: Multiple organ failures (OFs) are common in patients with cirrhosis, but the independent effect of the number or type of OFs on liver transplantation (LT) outcomes is not well defined. Method: United Network for Organ Sharing data were analyzed from 2002 to 2016 for all adults listed for LT who received an LT within 30 days after listing. We estimated post-LT survival stratified by number and type of pre-transplant OFs before and after adjusting for confounding variables. Results: During the study period, 4,714 (4.1%) patients died and 19,375 (16.6%) patients were transplanted within 30 days of listing. One or more OF were more common in those who were transplanted (57.4%) compared to those without LT (9.5%). The probability of staying alive more than 30 days on the waiting list without LT decreased with increasing number of OFs; while 90% were alive without OF, only 20% were alive with two OFs, and 2–8% with three or more OFs. The interval between listing and transplantation decreased with an increase in OFs, and the median time to transplant after listing was only 4–5 days with three or more OFs. Although the risk of post-LT mortality increased with increasing number of OFs, the 90-day patient survival was 90% and one-year survival was 81% in the presence of 5–6 OFs. The number of OFs was an independent predictor of survival, but the maximum difference in one-year graft or patient survival between those without OF and those with 5–6 OFs was only 9%. Additionally, the type of OF had minimal impact on outcomes. Conclusions: Liver transplantation is feasible with excellent outcomes, even in the presence of five or six OFs. Lay summary: Multiple organ failures, ranging from 1–6, are common in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis. The survival without liver transplant is dismal in the presence of three or more organ failures. Small retrospective studies have shown that liver transplant is feasible with good outcomes even in the presence of multiple organ failures. In this study, using a large national dataset, we show that survival chances for more than 30 days in those with three or more organ failures are less than 8%. However, if a liver transplant is performed quickly, the survival chances are very high with one-year survival ranging from 84% with three organ failures to 81% with 5–6 organ failures.

AB - Background & Aims: Multiple organ failures (OFs) are common in patients with cirrhosis, but the independent effect of the number or type of OFs on liver transplantation (LT) outcomes is not well defined. Method: United Network for Organ Sharing data were analyzed from 2002 to 2016 for all adults listed for LT who received an LT within 30 days after listing. We estimated post-LT survival stratified by number and type of pre-transplant OFs before and after adjusting for confounding variables. Results: During the study period, 4,714 (4.1%) patients died and 19,375 (16.6%) patients were transplanted within 30 days of listing. One or more OF were more common in those who were transplanted (57.4%) compared to those without LT (9.5%). The probability of staying alive more than 30 days on the waiting list without LT decreased with increasing number of OFs; while 90% were alive without OF, only 20% were alive with two OFs, and 2–8% with three or more OFs. The interval between listing and transplantation decreased with an increase in OFs, and the median time to transplant after listing was only 4–5 days with three or more OFs. Although the risk of post-LT mortality increased with increasing number of OFs, the 90-day patient survival was 90% and one-year survival was 81% in the presence of 5–6 OFs. The number of OFs was an independent predictor of survival, but the maximum difference in one-year graft or patient survival between those without OF and those with 5–6 OFs was only 9%. Additionally, the type of OF had minimal impact on outcomes. Conclusions: Liver transplantation is feasible with excellent outcomes, even in the presence of five or six OFs. Lay summary: Multiple organ failures, ranging from 1–6, are common in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis. The survival without liver transplant is dismal in the presence of three or more organ failures. Small retrospective studies have shown that liver transplant is feasible with good outcomes even in the presence of multiple organ failures. In this study, using a large national dataset, we show that survival chances for more than 30 days in those with three or more organ failures are less than 8%. However, if a liver transplant is performed quickly, the survival chances are very high with one-year survival ranging from 84% with three organ failures to 81% with 5–6 organ failures.

KW - Liver transplant

KW - Organ failure

KW - Survival outcomes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053725928&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053725928&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.07.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.07.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 30071241

AN - SCOPUS:85053725928

VL - 69

SP - 1047

EP - 1056

JO - Journal of Hepatology

JF - Journal of Hepatology

SN - 0168-8278

IS - 5

ER -