Load dependence of the effective regurgitant orifice area in a sheep model of aortic regurgitation

Sharon C. Reimold, John G. Byrne, Eduardo S. Caguioa, C. Chin Lee, Rita G. Laurence, Pamela S. Peigh, Lawrence H. Cohn, Richard T. Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

Treatment of patients with aortic regurgitation with vasodilators reduces regurgitant volume, ventricular dilation and left ventricular mass. Although these effects are presumably due to afterload reduction, it is also possible that the aortic regurgitant orifice area is not constant. To test the latter hypothesis, aortic regurgitation was created in 10 open chest sheep by partial resection of the noncoronary leaflet under direct visualization. Regurgitant flow was measured with an aortic supravalvular electromagnetic probe; aortic and left ventricular pressures were measured with catheter-tipped micromanometer pressure transducers. The effective regurgitant orifice area was calculated by a modification of the continuity equation in a manner similar to the Gorlin equation. The regurgitant orifice area was measured three times: after aortic regurgitation was created, after mean arterial pressure was increased by 15 to 25 mm Hg with intravenous dopamine and after mean arterial pressure was reduced by 15 to 25 mm Hg with intravenous sodium nitroprusside. Comparison of regurgitant volumes and areas obtained after creation of aortic regurgitation and at the conclusion of the experiment in the absence of dopamine or sodium nitroprusside demonstrated no significant change over time. Dopamine administration was associated with an 86 ± 81% increase in regurgitant volume (p < 0.01) and a 38 ± 44% increase in regurgitant orifice area (p < 0.01). Sodium nitroprusside administration resulted in a 51 ± 14% decrease in regurgitant volume (p < 0.001) and a 28 ± 21% reduction in regurgitant orifice area (p = 0.007). In this model of acute aortic regurgitation, the effective regurgitant orifice area was altered by increasing or decreasing the aortic transvalvular pressure gradient. This dynamic nature of the regurgitant orifice area may be secondary to changes in aortic root geometry at various aortic pressures. Reduction of this area may be one of the mechanisms of the beneficial effect of afterload reduction in patients with aortic regurgitation, particularly when the elasticity of the aortic valve apparatus has not been impaired by fibrosis or calcification.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1085-1090
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1991

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this