Local VS. other forms of anesthesia for open inguinal hernia repair: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Madison Argo, Juan Favela, Tri Phung, Sergio Huerta

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There is variation in the anesthetic technique for open inguinal hernia repair (OIHR) worldwide. Factors determining the anesthetic technique remains equivocal. We hypothesize that outcomes and operative room times are superior with local anesthesia (LA) compared to AO [all others (general and spinal anesthesia)]. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines and set inclusion and exclusion criteria, various databases were reviewed and 18 RCT's were isolated. Using ReviewManager 5.3, multiple parameters were used to test for overall effect between the included studies. Results: Overall complication rate was similar in LA vs. AO (p = 0.06). Wound infection and hematomas were similar between LA vs. OA, but urinary retention was significantly decreased in LA (p = 0.0002). Patient satisfaction was not inferior with LA (p = 0.10). Surgical time was similar in LA vs. AO (p = 0.86), but operating room time was significantly decreased with LA (p < 0.0001). The literature review also showed a decrease in the LOS and cost when LA was used. Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrates that LA is a well-tolerated for OIHR with OR times and urinary retention being significantly decreased.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican journal of surgery
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Inguinal Hernia
Herniorrhaphy
Local Anesthesia
Meta-Analysis
Anesthesia
Randomized Controlled Trials
Urinary Retention
Operative Time
Anesthetics
Spinal Anesthesia
Wound Infection
Operating Rooms
Patient Satisfaction
Hematoma
General Anesthesia
Databases
Guidelines
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Bassini
  • Femoral hernia
  • Inguinal hernia cost
  • Lichtenstein repair
  • McVay repair

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Local VS. other forms of anesthesia for open inguinal hernia repair : A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. / Argo, Madison; Favela, Juan; Phung, Tri; Huerta, Sergio.

In: American journal of surgery, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{aa16e55875f04d218bc96d90352a28f8,
title = "Local VS. other forms of anesthesia for open inguinal hernia repair: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials",
abstract = "Background: There is variation in the anesthetic technique for open inguinal hernia repair (OIHR) worldwide. Factors determining the anesthetic technique remains equivocal. We hypothesize that outcomes and operative room times are superior with local anesthesia (LA) compared to AO [all others (general and spinal anesthesia)]. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines and set inclusion and exclusion criteria, various databases were reviewed and 18 RCT's were isolated. Using ReviewManager 5.3, multiple parameters were used to test for overall effect between the included studies. Results: Overall complication rate was similar in LA vs. AO (p = 0.06). Wound infection and hematomas were similar between LA vs. OA, but urinary retention was significantly decreased in LA (p = 0.0002). Patient satisfaction was not inferior with LA (p = 0.10). Surgical time was similar in LA vs. AO (p = 0.86), but operating room time was significantly decreased with LA (p < 0.0001). The literature review also showed a decrease in the LOS and cost when LA was used. Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrates that LA is a well-tolerated for OIHR with OR times and urinary retention being significantly decreased.",
keywords = "Bassini, Femoral hernia, Inguinal hernia cost, Lichtenstein repair, McVay repair",
author = "Madison Argo and Juan Favela and Tri Phung and Sergio Huerta",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.06.024",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Local VS. other forms of anesthesia for open inguinal hernia repair

T2 - A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AU - Argo, Madison

AU - Favela, Juan

AU - Phung, Tri

AU - Huerta, Sergio

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: There is variation in the anesthetic technique for open inguinal hernia repair (OIHR) worldwide. Factors determining the anesthetic technique remains equivocal. We hypothesize that outcomes and operative room times are superior with local anesthesia (LA) compared to AO [all others (general and spinal anesthesia)]. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines and set inclusion and exclusion criteria, various databases were reviewed and 18 RCT's were isolated. Using ReviewManager 5.3, multiple parameters were used to test for overall effect between the included studies. Results: Overall complication rate was similar in LA vs. AO (p = 0.06). Wound infection and hematomas were similar between LA vs. OA, but urinary retention was significantly decreased in LA (p = 0.0002). Patient satisfaction was not inferior with LA (p = 0.10). Surgical time was similar in LA vs. AO (p = 0.86), but operating room time was significantly decreased with LA (p < 0.0001). The literature review also showed a decrease in the LOS and cost when LA was used. Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrates that LA is a well-tolerated for OIHR with OR times and urinary retention being significantly decreased.

AB - Background: There is variation in the anesthetic technique for open inguinal hernia repair (OIHR) worldwide. Factors determining the anesthetic technique remains equivocal. We hypothesize that outcomes and operative room times are superior with local anesthesia (LA) compared to AO [all others (general and spinal anesthesia)]. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines and set inclusion and exclusion criteria, various databases were reviewed and 18 RCT's were isolated. Using ReviewManager 5.3, multiple parameters were used to test for overall effect between the included studies. Results: Overall complication rate was similar in LA vs. AO (p = 0.06). Wound infection and hematomas were similar between LA vs. OA, but urinary retention was significantly decreased in LA (p = 0.0002). Patient satisfaction was not inferior with LA (p = 0.10). Surgical time was similar in LA vs. AO (p = 0.86), but operating room time was significantly decreased with LA (p < 0.0001). The literature review also showed a decrease in the LOS and cost when LA was used. Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrates that LA is a well-tolerated for OIHR with OR times and urinary retention being significantly decreased.

KW - Bassini

KW - Femoral hernia

KW - Inguinal hernia cost

KW - Lichtenstein repair

KW - McVay repair

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068473053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068473053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.06.024

DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.06.024

M3 - Review article

C2 - 31288925

AN - SCOPUS:85068473053

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

ER -