Locomotion of fish epidermal keratocytes on spatially selective adhesion patterns

Gabor Csucs, Katharina Quirin, Gaudenz Danuser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cell migration results from forces generated by assembly, contraction, and adhesion of the cytoskeleton. To address how these forces integrate in space and time, novel assays are required that allow spatial separation of the different force categories. We used micro-contact printing of fibronectin on glass substrates to study the effect of adhesion patterns on fish epidermal keratocytes locomotion. Cells migrated at similar speeds on homogeneously adhesive substrates and on patterns with 5 μm-wide adhesive stripes interleaved by non-adhesive stripes with a width varied between 5 and 13 μm. The leading edge protruded on adhesive stripes and lagged behind on non-adhesive stripes. On patterns with non-adhesive stripes wider than 13 μm cells halted, although the lamellipodium did not collapse. High correlation was found between the widths of protruding and lagging edge segments and the widths of the underlying stripes. We explain our data by the force balances between actin polymerization, contraction and adhesion on fibronectin stripes; and between actin polymerization, contraction and lamellipodium-internal elastic tension on non-adhesive stripes. We tested our model further by blocking lamellipodium actin network contraction and polymerization. In both experiments we observed that cells eventually lost their ability to move. However, the two perturbations induced distinct morphological responses. The data suggested that forces powering forward motion of keratocytes are largely associated with network assembly whereas contraction maintains cell polarity. This study establishes spatially selective adhesion substrates and cell morphological readouts as a means to elucidate the mechanical balance between substrate adhesion and cytoskeleton-internal tension in cell migration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)856-867
Number of pages12
JournalCell Motility and the Cytoskeleton
Volume64
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2007

Fingerprint

Pseudopodia
Locomotion
Polymerization
Adhesives
Actins
Fishes
Cytoskeleton
Fibronectins
Cell Movement
Cell Polarity
Printing
Cell Adhesion
Glass

Keywords

  • Adhesion
  • Keratocytes
  • Micro-contact printing
  • Motility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cell Biology

Cite this

Locomotion of fish epidermal keratocytes on spatially selective adhesion patterns. / Csucs, Gabor; Quirin, Katharina; Danuser, Gaudenz.

In: Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton, Vol. 64, No. 11, 11.2007, p. 856-867.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3a326036a9b34e7c897cf518d1a04bab,
title = "Locomotion of fish epidermal keratocytes on spatially selective adhesion patterns",
abstract = "Cell migration results from forces generated by assembly, contraction, and adhesion of the cytoskeleton. To address how these forces integrate in space and time, novel assays are required that allow spatial separation of the different force categories. We used micro-contact printing of fibronectin on glass substrates to study the effect of adhesion patterns on fish epidermal keratocytes locomotion. Cells migrated at similar speeds on homogeneously adhesive substrates and on patterns with 5 μm-wide adhesive stripes interleaved by non-adhesive stripes with a width varied between 5 and 13 μm. The leading edge protruded on adhesive stripes and lagged behind on non-adhesive stripes. On patterns with non-adhesive stripes wider than 13 μm cells halted, although the lamellipodium did not collapse. High correlation was found between the widths of protruding and lagging edge segments and the widths of the underlying stripes. We explain our data by the force balances between actin polymerization, contraction and adhesion on fibronectin stripes; and between actin polymerization, contraction and lamellipodium-internal elastic tension on non-adhesive stripes. We tested our model further by blocking lamellipodium actin network contraction and polymerization. In both experiments we observed that cells eventually lost their ability to move. However, the two perturbations induced distinct morphological responses. The data suggested that forces powering forward motion of keratocytes are largely associated with network assembly whereas contraction maintains cell polarity. This study establishes spatially selective adhesion substrates and cell morphological readouts as a means to elucidate the mechanical balance between substrate adhesion and cytoskeleton-internal tension in cell migration.",
keywords = "Adhesion, Keratocytes, Micro-contact printing, Motility",
author = "Gabor Csucs and Katharina Quirin and Gaudenz Danuser",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1002/cm.20230",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "856--867",
journal = "Cytoskeleton",
issn = "1949-3584",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Locomotion of fish epidermal keratocytes on spatially selective adhesion patterns

AU - Csucs, Gabor

AU - Quirin, Katharina

AU - Danuser, Gaudenz

PY - 2007/11

Y1 - 2007/11

N2 - Cell migration results from forces generated by assembly, contraction, and adhesion of the cytoskeleton. To address how these forces integrate in space and time, novel assays are required that allow spatial separation of the different force categories. We used micro-contact printing of fibronectin on glass substrates to study the effect of adhesion patterns on fish epidermal keratocytes locomotion. Cells migrated at similar speeds on homogeneously adhesive substrates and on patterns with 5 μm-wide adhesive stripes interleaved by non-adhesive stripes with a width varied between 5 and 13 μm. The leading edge protruded on adhesive stripes and lagged behind on non-adhesive stripes. On patterns with non-adhesive stripes wider than 13 μm cells halted, although the lamellipodium did not collapse. High correlation was found between the widths of protruding and lagging edge segments and the widths of the underlying stripes. We explain our data by the force balances between actin polymerization, contraction and adhesion on fibronectin stripes; and between actin polymerization, contraction and lamellipodium-internal elastic tension on non-adhesive stripes. We tested our model further by blocking lamellipodium actin network contraction and polymerization. In both experiments we observed that cells eventually lost their ability to move. However, the two perturbations induced distinct morphological responses. The data suggested that forces powering forward motion of keratocytes are largely associated with network assembly whereas contraction maintains cell polarity. This study establishes spatially selective adhesion substrates and cell morphological readouts as a means to elucidate the mechanical balance between substrate adhesion and cytoskeleton-internal tension in cell migration.

AB - Cell migration results from forces generated by assembly, contraction, and adhesion of the cytoskeleton. To address how these forces integrate in space and time, novel assays are required that allow spatial separation of the different force categories. We used micro-contact printing of fibronectin on glass substrates to study the effect of adhesion patterns on fish epidermal keratocytes locomotion. Cells migrated at similar speeds on homogeneously adhesive substrates and on patterns with 5 μm-wide adhesive stripes interleaved by non-adhesive stripes with a width varied between 5 and 13 μm. The leading edge protruded on adhesive stripes and lagged behind on non-adhesive stripes. On patterns with non-adhesive stripes wider than 13 μm cells halted, although the lamellipodium did not collapse. High correlation was found between the widths of protruding and lagging edge segments and the widths of the underlying stripes. We explain our data by the force balances between actin polymerization, contraction and adhesion on fibronectin stripes; and between actin polymerization, contraction and lamellipodium-internal elastic tension on non-adhesive stripes. We tested our model further by blocking lamellipodium actin network contraction and polymerization. In both experiments we observed that cells eventually lost their ability to move. However, the two perturbations induced distinct morphological responses. The data suggested that forces powering forward motion of keratocytes are largely associated with network assembly whereas contraction maintains cell polarity. This study establishes spatially selective adhesion substrates and cell morphological readouts as a means to elucidate the mechanical balance between substrate adhesion and cytoskeleton-internal tension in cell migration.

KW - Adhesion

KW - Keratocytes

KW - Micro-contact printing

KW - Motility

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35649004939&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35649004939&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/cm.20230

DO - 10.1002/cm.20230

M3 - Article

C2 - 17712861

AN - SCOPUS:35649004939

VL - 64

SP - 856

EP - 867

JO - Cytoskeleton

JF - Cytoskeleton

SN - 1949-3584

IS - 11

ER -