Abstract
Objective: To assess the long-term crossover (CO) rate in men undergoing watchfulwaiting (WW) as a primary treatment strategy for their asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias. Background: With an average follow-up of 3.2 years, a randomized controlled trial comparing WW with routine repair for male patients with minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias led investigators to conclude that WW was an acceptable option [JAMA. 2006;295(3):285-292]. We now analyze patients in the WW group after an additional 7 years of follow-up. Methods: At the conclusion of the original study, 254 men who had been assigned to WW consented to longer-term follow-up. These patients were contacted yearly by mail questionnaire. Nonresponders were contacted by phone or e-mail for additional data collection. Results: Eighty-one of the 254 men (31.9%) crossed over to surgical repair before the end of the original study,December 31, 2004, with amedian followup of 3.2 (range: 2-4.5) years. The patients have now been followed for an additional 7 years with a maximum follow-up of 11.5 years. The estimated cumulative CO rates using Kaplan-Meier analysis was 68%. Men older than 65 years crossed over at a considerably higher rate than younger men (79% vs 62%). Themost common reason for COwas pain (54.1%).Atotal of 3 patients have required an emergency operation, but there has been no mortality. Conclusions: Men who present to their physicians because of an inguinal hernia even when minimally symptomatic should be counseled that although WW is a reasonable and safe strategy, symptoms will likely progress and an operation will be needed eventually.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 508-514 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Annals of Surgery |
Volume | 258 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 1 2013 |
Keywords
- Hernia accident
- Inguinal hernia
- Minimally symptomatic
- Randomized controlled trial
- Watchful waiting
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Surgery