Low-profile versus standard-profile multibranched thoracoabdominal aortic stent grafts

Bala Ramanan, Charlene C. Fernandez, Julia D. Sobel, Warren J. Gasper, Shant M. Vartanian, Linda M. Reilly, Timothy A.M. Chuter, Jade S. Hiramoto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective This study compared midterm results using low-profile stent grafts (LPSGs; 18F) and standard-profile stent grafts (SPSGs; 22F-24F) for endovascular pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. Methods From July 2005 to March 2015, 134 asymptomatic patients underwent endovascular repair of a pararenal or TAAA using multibranched aortic stent grafts. In March 2011, we started using a LPSG with nitinol stents and thin-walled polyester fabric. Prospectively collected data on operative repair, complications, and outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results LPSGs were used in 37 patients (8 women [21.6%]; mean ± standard deviation age, 72.5 ± 8 years) and SPSGs in 97 patients (25 [26%] women; mean age, 73 ± 8 years). Medical comorbidities, aneurysm size, and aneurysm extent were similar in the LPSG and SPSG groups. Mean follow-up time was longer in the SPSG group (3.1 ± 2 years) than in the LPSG group (1.3 ± 0.9 years; P <.001). Operative time, renal failure, stroke, myocardial infarction, and perioperative death were not significantly different between the two groups (P >.05). Aneurysm-related death, rupture, stent graft migration, type I or III endoleaks, aneurysm enlargement >5 mm, branch vessel occlusion, and reintervention rates were similar between the two groups (P >.05). However, the combined outcome of conduit use or access artery injury occurred at a lower rate in the LPSG group than in the SPSG group (16% vs 36%; P =.03). Women experienced significantly higher rates of conduit use and access artery injury than men after repair with SPSGs (64% vs 26%, respectively; P =.001) but similar rates after repair with the LPSG (25% vs 14%, respectively; P =.45). Conclusions LPSGs had similar safety profile and midterm outcomes compared with the SPSGs for treatment of pararenal and TAAA. The substitution of LPSGs for SPSGs lowered the number of patients who required conduit insertion to avoid access artery injury, especially in women, thereby reducing an otherwise striking gender difference.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)39-45
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Vascular Surgery
Volume64
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2016

Fingerprint

Stents
Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm
Aneurysm
Transplants
Arteries
Wounds and Injuries
Endoleak
Polyesters
Comorbidity
Rupture
Safety
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Ramanan, B., Fernandez, C. C., Sobel, J. D., Gasper, W. J., Vartanian, S. M., Reilly, L. M., ... Hiramoto, J. S. (2016). Low-profile versus standard-profile multibranched thoracoabdominal aortic stent grafts. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 64(1), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2016.01.038

Low-profile versus standard-profile multibranched thoracoabdominal aortic stent grafts. / Ramanan, Bala; Fernandez, Charlene C.; Sobel, Julia D.; Gasper, Warren J.; Vartanian, Shant M.; Reilly, Linda M.; Chuter, Timothy A.M.; Hiramoto, Jade S.

In: Journal of Vascular Surgery, Vol. 64, No. 1, 01.07.2016, p. 39-45.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ramanan, B, Fernandez, CC, Sobel, JD, Gasper, WJ, Vartanian, SM, Reilly, LM, Chuter, TAM & Hiramoto, JS 2016, 'Low-profile versus standard-profile multibranched thoracoabdominal aortic stent grafts', Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 39-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2016.01.038
Ramanan, Bala ; Fernandez, Charlene C. ; Sobel, Julia D. ; Gasper, Warren J. ; Vartanian, Shant M. ; Reilly, Linda M. ; Chuter, Timothy A.M. ; Hiramoto, Jade S. / Low-profile versus standard-profile multibranched thoracoabdominal aortic stent grafts. In: Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2016 ; Vol. 64, No. 1. pp. 39-45.
@article{a5d4e5b37a2e4755b1b0c8a1ba076f4a,
title = "Low-profile versus standard-profile multibranched thoracoabdominal aortic stent grafts",
abstract = "Objective This study compared midterm results using low-profile stent grafts (LPSGs; 18F) and standard-profile stent grafts (SPSGs; 22F-24F) for endovascular pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. Methods From July 2005 to March 2015, 134 asymptomatic patients underwent endovascular repair of a pararenal or TAAA using multibranched aortic stent grafts. In March 2011, we started using a LPSG with nitinol stents and thin-walled polyester fabric. Prospectively collected data on operative repair, complications, and outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results LPSGs were used in 37 patients (8 women [21.6{\%}]; mean ± standard deviation age, 72.5 ± 8 years) and SPSGs in 97 patients (25 [26{\%}] women; mean age, 73 ± 8 years). Medical comorbidities, aneurysm size, and aneurysm extent were similar in the LPSG and SPSG groups. Mean follow-up time was longer in the SPSG group (3.1 ± 2 years) than in the LPSG group (1.3 ± 0.9 years; P <.001). Operative time, renal failure, stroke, myocardial infarction, and perioperative death were not significantly different between the two groups (P >.05). Aneurysm-related death, rupture, stent graft migration, type I or III endoleaks, aneurysm enlargement >5 mm, branch vessel occlusion, and reintervention rates were similar between the two groups (P >.05). However, the combined outcome of conduit use or access artery injury occurred at a lower rate in the LPSG group than in the SPSG group (16{\%} vs 36{\%}; P =.03). Women experienced significantly higher rates of conduit use and access artery injury than men after repair with SPSGs (64{\%} vs 26{\%}, respectively; P =.001) but similar rates after repair with the LPSG (25{\%} vs 14{\%}, respectively; P =.45). Conclusions LPSGs had similar safety profile and midterm outcomes compared with the SPSGs for treatment of pararenal and TAAA. The substitution of LPSGs for SPSGs lowered the number of patients who required conduit insertion to avoid access artery injury, especially in women, thereby reducing an otherwise striking gender difference.",
author = "Bala Ramanan and Fernandez, {Charlene C.} and Sobel, {Julia D.} and Gasper, {Warren J.} and Vartanian, {Shant M.} and Reilly, {Linda M.} and Chuter, {Timothy A.M.} and Hiramoto, {Jade S.}",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jvs.2016.01.038",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "39--45",
journal = "Journal of Vascular Surgery",
issn = "0741-5214",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Low-profile versus standard-profile multibranched thoracoabdominal aortic stent grafts

AU - Ramanan, Bala

AU - Fernandez, Charlene C.

AU - Sobel, Julia D.

AU - Gasper, Warren J.

AU - Vartanian, Shant M.

AU - Reilly, Linda M.

AU - Chuter, Timothy A.M.

AU - Hiramoto, Jade S.

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Objective This study compared midterm results using low-profile stent grafts (LPSGs; 18F) and standard-profile stent grafts (SPSGs; 22F-24F) for endovascular pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. Methods From July 2005 to March 2015, 134 asymptomatic patients underwent endovascular repair of a pararenal or TAAA using multibranched aortic stent grafts. In March 2011, we started using a LPSG with nitinol stents and thin-walled polyester fabric. Prospectively collected data on operative repair, complications, and outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results LPSGs were used in 37 patients (8 women [21.6%]; mean ± standard deviation age, 72.5 ± 8 years) and SPSGs in 97 patients (25 [26%] women; mean age, 73 ± 8 years). Medical comorbidities, aneurysm size, and aneurysm extent were similar in the LPSG and SPSG groups. Mean follow-up time was longer in the SPSG group (3.1 ± 2 years) than in the LPSG group (1.3 ± 0.9 years; P <.001). Operative time, renal failure, stroke, myocardial infarction, and perioperative death were not significantly different between the two groups (P >.05). Aneurysm-related death, rupture, stent graft migration, type I or III endoleaks, aneurysm enlargement >5 mm, branch vessel occlusion, and reintervention rates were similar between the two groups (P >.05). However, the combined outcome of conduit use or access artery injury occurred at a lower rate in the LPSG group than in the SPSG group (16% vs 36%; P =.03). Women experienced significantly higher rates of conduit use and access artery injury than men after repair with SPSGs (64% vs 26%, respectively; P =.001) but similar rates after repair with the LPSG (25% vs 14%, respectively; P =.45). Conclusions LPSGs had similar safety profile and midterm outcomes compared with the SPSGs for treatment of pararenal and TAAA. The substitution of LPSGs for SPSGs lowered the number of patients who required conduit insertion to avoid access artery injury, especially in women, thereby reducing an otherwise striking gender difference.

AB - Objective This study compared midterm results using low-profile stent grafts (LPSGs; 18F) and standard-profile stent grafts (SPSGs; 22F-24F) for endovascular pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. Methods From July 2005 to March 2015, 134 asymptomatic patients underwent endovascular repair of a pararenal or TAAA using multibranched aortic stent grafts. In March 2011, we started using a LPSG with nitinol stents and thin-walled polyester fabric. Prospectively collected data on operative repair, complications, and outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results LPSGs were used in 37 patients (8 women [21.6%]; mean ± standard deviation age, 72.5 ± 8 years) and SPSGs in 97 patients (25 [26%] women; mean age, 73 ± 8 years). Medical comorbidities, aneurysm size, and aneurysm extent were similar in the LPSG and SPSG groups. Mean follow-up time was longer in the SPSG group (3.1 ± 2 years) than in the LPSG group (1.3 ± 0.9 years; P <.001). Operative time, renal failure, stroke, myocardial infarction, and perioperative death were not significantly different between the two groups (P >.05). Aneurysm-related death, rupture, stent graft migration, type I or III endoleaks, aneurysm enlargement >5 mm, branch vessel occlusion, and reintervention rates were similar between the two groups (P >.05). However, the combined outcome of conduit use or access artery injury occurred at a lower rate in the LPSG group than in the SPSG group (16% vs 36%; P =.03). Women experienced significantly higher rates of conduit use and access artery injury than men after repair with SPSGs (64% vs 26%, respectively; P =.001) but similar rates after repair with the LPSG (25% vs 14%, respectively; P =.45). Conclusions LPSGs had similar safety profile and midterm outcomes compared with the SPSGs for treatment of pararenal and TAAA. The substitution of LPSGs for SPSGs lowered the number of patients who required conduit insertion to avoid access artery injury, especially in women, thereby reducing an otherwise striking gender difference.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961116330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961116330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.01.038

DO - 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.01.038

M3 - Article

C2 - 26994953

AN - SCOPUS:84961116330

VL - 64

SP - 39

EP - 45

JO - Journal of Vascular Surgery

JF - Journal of Vascular Surgery

SN - 0741-5214

IS - 1

ER -