Magnetic resonance imaging of the scrotum

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

MRI demonstrates exquisite anatomical detail of the entire scrotum and inguinal region, adding a new dimension to the assessment of scrotal disease. MRI allows the recognition and distinction of intrascrotal structures and clearly displays their alteration in disease states. MR interpretation is based on a constellation of intrascrotal findings. A specific diagnosis frequently can be made from the MR results combined with the clinical presentation. On the other hand, MR is more expensive and time consuming than sonography and access in many geographic areas is still limited. MRI may be helpful when ultrasound is inconclusive or fails to demonstrate a clinically suspected lesion. In the author's experience, when MR has been the first imaging modality used, ultrasound has not been needed to reach a diagnosis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)95-108
Number of pages14
JournalSeminars in Ultrasound CT and MRI
Volume12
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jan 1 1991

Fingerprint

Scrotum
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Groin
Ultrasonography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Magnetic resonance imaging of the scrotum. / Mattrey, R. F.

In: Seminars in Ultrasound CT and MRI, Vol. 12, No. 2, 01.01.1991, p. 95-108.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{8ccdc2d6cff7487c8056e0aa85eb5b0e,
title = "Magnetic resonance imaging of the scrotum",
abstract = "MRI demonstrates exquisite anatomical detail of the entire scrotum and inguinal region, adding a new dimension to the assessment of scrotal disease. MRI allows the recognition and distinction of intrascrotal structures and clearly displays their alteration in disease states. MR interpretation is based on a constellation of intrascrotal findings. A specific diagnosis frequently can be made from the MR results combined with the clinical presentation. On the other hand, MR is more expensive and time consuming than sonography and access in many geographic areas is still limited. MRI may be helpful when ultrasound is inconclusive or fails to demonstrate a clinically suspected lesion. In the author's experience, when MR has been the first imaging modality used, ultrasound has not been needed to reach a diagnosis.",
author = "Mattrey, {R. F.}",
year = "1991",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "95--108",
journal = "Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI",
issn = "0887-2171",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Magnetic resonance imaging of the scrotum

AU - Mattrey, R. F.

PY - 1991/1/1

Y1 - 1991/1/1

N2 - MRI demonstrates exquisite anatomical detail of the entire scrotum and inguinal region, adding a new dimension to the assessment of scrotal disease. MRI allows the recognition and distinction of intrascrotal structures and clearly displays their alteration in disease states. MR interpretation is based on a constellation of intrascrotal findings. A specific diagnosis frequently can be made from the MR results combined with the clinical presentation. On the other hand, MR is more expensive and time consuming than sonography and access in many geographic areas is still limited. MRI may be helpful when ultrasound is inconclusive or fails to demonstrate a clinically suspected lesion. In the author's experience, when MR has been the first imaging modality used, ultrasound has not been needed to reach a diagnosis.

AB - MRI demonstrates exquisite anatomical detail of the entire scrotum and inguinal region, adding a new dimension to the assessment of scrotal disease. MRI allows the recognition and distinction of intrascrotal structures and clearly displays their alteration in disease states. MR interpretation is based on a constellation of intrascrotal findings. A specific diagnosis frequently can be made from the MR results combined with the clinical presentation. On the other hand, MR is more expensive and time consuming than sonography and access in many geographic areas is still limited. MRI may be helpful when ultrasound is inconclusive or fails to demonstrate a clinically suspected lesion. In the author's experience, when MR has been the first imaging modality used, ultrasound has not been needed to reach a diagnosis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026036382&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026036382&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

VL - 12

SP - 95

EP - 108

JO - Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI

JF - Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI

SN - 0887-2171

IS - 2

ER -