Maintaining quality control using a radiological digital X-ray dashboard

Todd R. Minnigh, Jacqueline Gallet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Repeats are indicators for the quality-imaging manager to schedule additional training and to be used as a basis for dialog with the reading radiologists to improve the service and quality to patients and referring physicians. Through the thoughtful application of software and networking, dose management, X-ray usage, and repeat analysis data can be made available centrally. This provides clinically useful technologist-centric results greatly benefiting an enterprise. This study tracked a radiology department's use of a digital X-ray dashboard software application. It was discovered that 80% of the exams were performed by only 21% of the technologists and that the technologist with the highest throughput had a personal repeat rate of 6.5% compared to the department average of 7.6%. This study indicated that useful information could be derived and used as a basis for improving the radiology department's operations and in maintaining high quality standards.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)84-88
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Digital Imaging
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2009

Fingerprint

Radiology
Quality Control
Quality control
Software
X-Rays
X rays
Application programs
Dosimetry
Reading
Appointments and Schedules
Managers
Throughput
Physicians
Imaging techniques
Industry
Radiologists

Keywords

  • Computed radiography
  • Dashboard
  • Digital radiography
  • Dose
  • Productivity
  • Quality control
  • Quality management
  • Radiology management
  • Repeat analysis
  • Workflow

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

Maintaining quality control using a radiological digital X-ray dashboard. / Minnigh, Todd R.; Gallet, Jacqueline.

In: Journal of Digital Imaging, Vol. 22, No. 1, 02.2009, p. 84-88.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b102504a50fe4fc59639e75a591b3d4b,
title = "Maintaining quality control using a radiological digital X-ray dashboard",
abstract = "Repeats are indicators for the quality-imaging manager to schedule additional training and to be used as a basis for dialog with the reading radiologists to improve the service and quality to patients and referring physicians. Through the thoughtful application of software and networking, dose management, X-ray usage, and repeat analysis data can be made available centrally. This provides clinically useful technologist-centric results greatly benefiting an enterprise. This study tracked a radiology department's use of a digital X-ray dashboard software application. It was discovered that 80{\%} of the exams were performed by only 21{\%} of the technologists and that the technologist with the highest throughput had a personal repeat rate of 6.5{\%} compared to the department average of 7.6{\%}. This study indicated that useful information could be derived and used as a basis for improving the radiology department's operations and in maintaining high quality standards.",
keywords = "Computed radiography, Dashboard, Digital radiography, Dose, Productivity, Quality control, Quality management, Radiology management, Repeat analysis, Workflow",
author = "Minnigh, {Todd R.} and Jacqueline Gallet",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1007/s10278-007-9098-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "84--88",
journal = "Journal of Digital Imaging",
issn = "0897-1889",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Maintaining quality control using a radiological digital X-ray dashboard

AU - Minnigh, Todd R.

AU - Gallet, Jacqueline

PY - 2009/2

Y1 - 2009/2

N2 - Repeats are indicators for the quality-imaging manager to schedule additional training and to be used as a basis for dialog with the reading radiologists to improve the service and quality to patients and referring physicians. Through the thoughtful application of software and networking, dose management, X-ray usage, and repeat analysis data can be made available centrally. This provides clinically useful technologist-centric results greatly benefiting an enterprise. This study tracked a radiology department's use of a digital X-ray dashboard software application. It was discovered that 80% of the exams were performed by only 21% of the technologists and that the technologist with the highest throughput had a personal repeat rate of 6.5% compared to the department average of 7.6%. This study indicated that useful information could be derived and used as a basis for improving the radiology department's operations and in maintaining high quality standards.

AB - Repeats are indicators for the quality-imaging manager to schedule additional training and to be used as a basis for dialog with the reading radiologists to improve the service and quality to patients and referring physicians. Through the thoughtful application of software and networking, dose management, X-ray usage, and repeat analysis data can be made available centrally. This provides clinically useful technologist-centric results greatly benefiting an enterprise. This study tracked a radiology department's use of a digital X-ray dashboard software application. It was discovered that 80% of the exams were performed by only 21% of the technologists and that the technologist with the highest throughput had a personal repeat rate of 6.5% compared to the department average of 7.6%. This study indicated that useful information could be derived and used as a basis for improving the radiology department's operations and in maintaining high quality standards.

KW - Computed radiography

KW - Dashboard

KW - Digital radiography

KW - Dose

KW - Productivity

KW - Quality control

KW - Quality management

KW - Radiology management

KW - Repeat analysis

KW - Workflow

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58849143102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58849143102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10278-007-9098-4

DO - 10.1007/s10278-007-9098-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 18270779

AN - SCOPUS:58849143102

VL - 22

SP - 84

EP - 88

JO - Journal of Digital Imaging

JF - Journal of Digital Imaging

SN - 0897-1889

IS - 1

ER -