Major depression symptoms in primary care and psychiatric care settings

A cross-sectional analysis

Bradley N. Gaynes, A. John Rush, Madhukar H. Trivedi, Stephen R. Wisniewski, G. K. Balasubramani, Donald C. Spencer, Timothy Petersen, Michael Klinkman, Diane Warden, Linda Nicholas, Maurizio Fava

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

76 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: We undertook a study to confirm and extend preliminary findings that participants with major depressive disorder (MDD) in primary care and specialty care settings have with equivalent degrees of depression severity and an indistinguishable constellation of symptoms. METHODS: Baseline data were collected for a distinct validation cohort of 2,541 participants (42% primary care) from 14 US regional centers comprised of 41 clinic sites (18 primary care, 23 specialty care). Participants met broadly inclusive eligibility criteria requiring a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, diagnosis of MDD and a minimum depressive symptom score on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. The main outcome measures were the 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Rated and the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire. RESULTS: Primary care and specialty care participants had identical levels of moderately severe depression and identical distributions of depressive severity scores. Both primary care and specialty care participants showed considerable suicide risk, with specialty care participants even more likely to report prior suicide attempts. Core depressive symptoms or concurrent psychiatric disorders were not substantially different between settings. One half of participants in each setting had an anxiety disorder (48.6% primary care vs 51.6% specialty care, P = .143), with social phobia being the most common (25.3% primary care vs 32.1% specialty care, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: For outpatients with nonpsychotic MDD, depressive symptoms and severity vary little between primary care and specialty care settings. In this large, broadly inclusive US sample, the risk factors for chronic and recurrent depressive illness were frequently present, highlighting a clear risk for treatment resistance and the need for aggressive management strategies in both settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)126-134
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Family Medicine
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2007

Fingerprint

Psychiatry
Primary Health Care
Cross-Sectional Studies
Depression
Major Depressive Disorder
Suicide
Anxiety Disorders
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Outpatients
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Depression
  • Primary care
  • Psychiatric comorbidity
  • Suicide

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

Gaynes, B. N., Rush, A. J., Trivedi, M. H., Wisniewski, S. R., Balasubramani, G. K., Spencer, D. C., ... Fava, M. (2007). Major depression symptoms in primary care and psychiatric care settings: A cross-sectional analysis. Annals of Family Medicine, 5(2), 126-134. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.641

Major depression symptoms in primary care and psychiatric care settings : A cross-sectional analysis. / Gaynes, Bradley N.; Rush, A. John; Trivedi, Madhukar H.; Wisniewski, Stephen R.; Balasubramani, G. K.; Spencer, Donald C.; Petersen, Timothy; Klinkman, Michael; Warden, Diane; Nicholas, Linda; Fava, Maurizio.

In: Annals of Family Medicine, Vol. 5, No. 2, 03.2007, p. 126-134.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gaynes, BN, Rush, AJ, Trivedi, MH, Wisniewski, SR, Balasubramani, GK, Spencer, DC, Petersen, T, Klinkman, M, Warden, D, Nicholas, L & Fava, M 2007, 'Major depression symptoms in primary care and psychiatric care settings: A cross-sectional analysis', Annals of Family Medicine, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 126-134. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.641
Gaynes, Bradley N. ; Rush, A. John ; Trivedi, Madhukar H. ; Wisniewski, Stephen R. ; Balasubramani, G. K. ; Spencer, Donald C. ; Petersen, Timothy ; Klinkman, Michael ; Warden, Diane ; Nicholas, Linda ; Fava, Maurizio. / Major depression symptoms in primary care and psychiatric care settings : A cross-sectional analysis. In: Annals of Family Medicine. 2007 ; Vol. 5, No. 2. pp. 126-134.
@article{76152a5409cf448c8aacd66f7bb05a3b,
title = "Major depression symptoms in primary care and psychiatric care settings: A cross-sectional analysis",
abstract = "PURPOSE: We undertook a study to confirm and extend preliminary findings that participants with major depressive disorder (MDD) in primary care and specialty care settings have with equivalent degrees of depression severity and an indistinguishable constellation of symptoms. METHODS: Baseline data were collected for a distinct validation cohort of 2,541 participants (42{\%} primary care) from 14 US regional centers comprised of 41 clinic sites (18 primary care, 23 specialty care). Participants met broadly inclusive eligibility criteria requiring a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, diagnosis of MDD and a minimum depressive symptom score on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. The main outcome measures were the 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Rated and the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire. RESULTS: Primary care and specialty care participants had identical levels of moderately severe depression and identical distributions of depressive severity scores. Both primary care and specialty care participants showed considerable suicide risk, with specialty care participants even more likely to report prior suicide attempts. Core depressive symptoms or concurrent psychiatric disorders were not substantially different between settings. One half of participants in each setting had an anxiety disorder (48.6{\%} primary care vs 51.6{\%} specialty care, P = .143), with social phobia being the most common (25.3{\%} primary care vs 32.1{\%} specialty care, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: For outpatients with nonpsychotic MDD, depressive symptoms and severity vary little between primary care and specialty care settings. In this large, broadly inclusive US sample, the risk factors for chronic and recurrent depressive illness were frequently present, highlighting a clear risk for treatment resistance and the need for aggressive management strategies in both settings.",
keywords = "Depression, Primary care, Psychiatric comorbidity, Suicide",
author = "Gaynes, {Bradley N.} and Rush, {A. John} and Trivedi, {Madhukar H.} and Wisniewski, {Stephen R.} and Balasubramani, {G. K.} and Spencer, {Donald C.} and Timothy Petersen and Michael Klinkman and Diane Warden and Linda Nicholas and Maurizio Fava",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1370/afm.641",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "126--134",
journal = "Annals of Family Medicine",
issn = "1544-1709",
publisher = "Annals of Family Medicine, Inc",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Major depression symptoms in primary care and psychiatric care settings

T2 - A cross-sectional analysis

AU - Gaynes, Bradley N.

AU - Rush, A. John

AU - Trivedi, Madhukar H.

AU - Wisniewski, Stephen R.

AU - Balasubramani, G. K.

AU - Spencer, Donald C.

AU - Petersen, Timothy

AU - Klinkman, Michael

AU - Warden, Diane

AU - Nicholas, Linda

AU - Fava, Maurizio

PY - 2007/3

Y1 - 2007/3

N2 - PURPOSE: We undertook a study to confirm and extend preliminary findings that participants with major depressive disorder (MDD) in primary care and specialty care settings have with equivalent degrees of depression severity and an indistinguishable constellation of symptoms. METHODS: Baseline data were collected for a distinct validation cohort of 2,541 participants (42% primary care) from 14 US regional centers comprised of 41 clinic sites (18 primary care, 23 specialty care). Participants met broadly inclusive eligibility criteria requiring a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, diagnosis of MDD and a minimum depressive symptom score on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. The main outcome measures were the 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Rated and the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire. RESULTS: Primary care and specialty care participants had identical levels of moderately severe depression and identical distributions of depressive severity scores. Both primary care and specialty care participants showed considerable suicide risk, with specialty care participants even more likely to report prior suicide attempts. Core depressive symptoms or concurrent psychiatric disorders were not substantially different between settings. One half of participants in each setting had an anxiety disorder (48.6% primary care vs 51.6% specialty care, P = .143), with social phobia being the most common (25.3% primary care vs 32.1% specialty care, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: For outpatients with nonpsychotic MDD, depressive symptoms and severity vary little between primary care and specialty care settings. In this large, broadly inclusive US sample, the risk factors for chronic and recurrent depressive illness were frequently present, highlighting a clear risk for treatment resistance and the need for aggressive management strategies in both settings.

AB - PURPOSE: We undertook a study to confirm and extend preliminary findings that participants with major depressive disorder (MDD) in primary care and specialty care settings have with equivalent degrees of depression severity and an indistinguishable constellation of symptoms. METHODS: Baseline data were collected for a distinct validation cohort of 2,541 participants (42% primary care) from 14 US regional centers comprised of 41 clinic sites (18 primary care, 23 specialty care). Participants met broadly inclusive eligibility criteria requiring a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, diagnosis of MDD and a minimum depressive symptom score on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. The main outcome measures were the 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Rated and the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire. RESULTS: Primary care and specialty care participants had identical levels of moderately severe depression and identical distributions of depressive severity scores. Both primary care and specialty care participants showed considerable suicide risk, with specialty care participants even more likely to report prior suicide attempts. Core depressive symptoms or concurrent psychiatric disorders were not substantially different between settings. One half of participants in each setting had an anxiety disorder (48.6% primary care vs 51.6% specialty care, P = .143), with social phobia being the most common (25.3% primary care vs 32.1% specialty care, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: For outpatients with nonpsychotic MDD, depressive symptoms and severity vary little between primary care and specialty care settings. In this large, broadly inclusive US sample, the risk factors for chronic and recurrent depressive illness were frequently present, highlighting a clear risk for treatment resistance and the need for aggressive management strategies in both settings.

KW - Depression

KW - Primary care

KW - Psychiatric comorbidity

KW - Suicide

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34047157034&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34047157034&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1370/afm.641

DO - 10.1370/afm.641

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 126

EP - 134

JO - Annals of Family Medicine

JF - Annals of Family Medicine

SN - 1544-1709

IS - 2

ER -