Making clinicians lives easier: Guidance on use of the QIDS self-report in place of the MADRS

Thomas J. Carmody, A. John Rush, Ira H. Bernstein, Stephen Brannan, Mustafa M. Husain, Madhukar H. Trivedi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The ability to convert total scores from one scale to another facilitates the interpretation of research findings and facilitates the use of systematic measurement in clinical practice. Methods: Item Response Theory methods were used to convert total scores between the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR16) and the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total scores. Data were obtained from a sample of 233 outpatients with highly treatment-resistant, nonpsychotic major depressive episodes participating in a one-year open label study of vagus nerve stimulation to augment psychotropic medication treatment. Results: MADRS total scores averaged 31.9 (SD = 6.7) at baseline and 21.9 (SD = 11.0) at one year. QIDS-SR16 total scores averaged 17.6 (SD = 3.6) at baseline and 12.5 (SD = 5.8) at one year. Based on one-year data (or exit if the patient did not complete one year), corresponding QIDS-SR16 and MADRS total scores were presented for each possible QIDS-SR16 and MADRS total score. A QIDS-SR16 total score of 5 was comparable to a MADRS total score of 7 or 8 (7.5). Limitation: The degree to which these results generalize to less treatment-resistant samples is unknown. Conclusion: The conversion of QIDS-SR16 and MADRS total scores provides a basis for clinicians who wish to use the QIDS-SR16 to understand what MADRS total scores reported in clinical trials approximate QIDS-SR16 total scores obtained with their patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)115-118
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Affective Disorders
Volume95
Issue number1-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2006

Fingerprint

Self Report
Vagus Nerve Stimulation
Outpatients
Therapeutics
Clinical Trials
Equipment and Supplies
Research

Keywords

  • 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-report (QIDS-SR)
  • Classical test theory
  • Item response theory
  • Montgomery Äsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
  • Psychometrics
  • Total score conversion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Neurology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Making clinicians lives easier : Guidance on use of the QIDS self-report in place of the MADRS. / Carmody, Thomas J.; Rush, A. John; Bernstein, Ira H.; Brannan, Stephen; Husain, Mustafa M.; Trivedi, Madhukar H.

In: Journal of Affective Disorders, Vol. 95, No. 1-3, 10.2006, p. 115-118.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f29092559eb04553ae3b43b6c1eaf7ed,
title = "Making clinicians lives easier: Guidance on use of the QIDS self-report in place of the MADRS",
abstract = "Background: The ability to convert total scores from one scale to another facilitates the interpretation of research findings and facilitates the use of systematic measurement in clinical practice. Methods: Item Response Theory methods were used to convert total scores between the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR16) and the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total scores. Data were obtained from a sample of 233 outpatients with highly treatment-resistant, nonpsychotic major depressive episodes participating in a one-year open label study of vagus nerve stimulation to augment psychotropic medication treatment. Results: MADRS total scores averaged 31.9 (SD = 6.7) at baseline and 21.9 (SD = 11.0) at one year. QIDS-SR16 total scores averaged 17.6 (SD = 3.6) at baseline and 12.5 (SD = 5.8) at one year. Based on one-year data (or exit if the patient did not complete one year), corresponding QIDS-SR16 and MADRS total scores were presented for each possible QIDS-SR16 and MADRS total score. A QIDS-SR16 total score of 5 was comparable to a MADRS total score of 7 or 8 (7.5). Limitation: The degree to which these results generalize to less treatment-resistant samples is unknown. Conclusion: The conversion of QIDS-SR16 and MADRS total scores provides a basis for clinicians who wish to use the QIDS-SR16 to understand what MADRS total scores reported in clinical trials approximate QIDS-SR16 total scores obtained with their patients.",
keywords = "16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-report (QIDS-SR), Classical test theory, Item response theory, Montgomery {\"A}sberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Psychometrics, Total score conversion",
author = "Carmody, {Thomas J.} and Rush, {A. John} and Bernstein, {Ira H.} and Stephen Brannan and Husain, {Mustafa M.} and Trivedi, {Madhukar H.}",
year = "2006",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.jad.2006.03.024",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "95",
pages = "115--118",
journal = "Journal of Affective Disorders",
issn = "0165-0327",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making clinicians lives easier

T2 - Guidance on use of the QIDS self-report in place of the MADRS

AU - Carmody, Thomas J.

AU - Rush, A. John

AU - Bernstein, Ira H.

AU - Brannan, Stephen

AU - Husain, Mustafa M.

AU - Trivedi, Madhukar H.

PY - 2006/10

Y1 - 2006/10

N2 - Background: The ability to convert total scores from one scale to another facilitates the interpretation of research findings and facilitates the use of systematic measurement in clinical practice. Methods: Item Response Theory methods were used to convert total scores between the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR16) and the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total scores. Data were obtained from a sample of 233 outpatients with highly treatment-resistant, nonpsychotic major depressive episodes participating in a one-year open label study of vagus nerve stimulation to augment psychotropic medication treatment. Results: MADRS total scores averaged 31.9 (SD = 6.7) at baseline and 21.9 (SD = 11.0) at one year. QIDS-SR16 total scores averaged 17.6 (SD = 3.6) at baseline and 12.5 (SD = 5.8) at one year. Based on one-year data (or exit if the patient did not complete one year), corresponding QIDS-SR16 and MADRS total scores were presented for each possible QIDS-SR16 and MADRS total score. A QIDS-SR16 total score of 5 was comparable to a MADRS total score of 7 or 8 (7.5). Limitation: The degree to which these results generalize to less treatment-resistant samples is unknown. Conclusion: The conversion of QIDS-SR16 and MADRS total scores provides a basis for clinicians who wish to use the QIDS-SR16 to understand what MADRS total scores reported in clinical trials approximate QIDS-SR16 total scores obtained with their patients.

AB - Background: The ability to convert total scores from one scale to another facilitates the interpretation of research findings and facilitates the use of systematic measurement in clinical practice. Methods: Item Response Theory methods were used to convert total scores between the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR16) and the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total scores. Data were obtained from a sample of 233 outpatients with highly treatment-resistant, nonpsychotic major depressive episodes participating in a one-year open label study of vagus nerve stimulation to augment psychotropic medication treatment. Results: MADRS total scores averaged 31.9 (SD = 6.7) at baseline and 21.9 (SD = 11.0) at one year. QIDS-SR16 total scores averaged 17.6 (SD = 3.6) at baseline and 12.5 (SD = 5.8) at one year. Based on one-year data (or exit if the patient did not complete one year), corresponding QIDS-SR16 and MADRS total scores were presented for each possible QIDS-SR16 and MADRS total score. A QIDS-SR16 total score of 5 was comparable to a MADRS total score of 7 or 8 (7.5). Limitation: The degree to which these results generalize to less treatment-resistant samples is unknown. Conclusion: The conversion of QIDS-SR16 and MADRS total scores provides a basis for clinicians who wish to use the QIDS-SR16 to understand what MADRS total scores reported in clinical trials approximate QIDS-SR16 total scores obtained with their patients.

KW - 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-report (QIDS-SR)

KW - Classical test theory

KW - Item response theory

KW - Montgomery Äsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

KW - Psychometrics

KW - Total score conversion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846265024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846265024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2006.03.024

DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2006.03.024

M3 - Article

C2 - 16707162

AN - SCOPUS:33846265024

VL - 95

SP - 115

EP - 118

JO - Journal of Affective Disorders

JF - Journal of Affective Disorders

SN - 0165-0327

IS - 1-3

ER -