Making Sense of Implant "profile" in Breast Augmentation

Dinah Wan, Rod J. Rohrich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The increasing variety of breast implants has led to their classification into "profile" types to guide implant cataloguing and selection. Implant "profile" describes the overall silhouette of the implant. It represents a permutation of all 3 dimensions of the implant: Base diameter, projection, and volume. Implant "profile" is not the same as implant projection. Implant projection is a quantifiable linear measurement of the anterior-posterior dimension of the implant, whereas implant "profile" is a vendor-driven assessment that currently lacks universal standardization. Until "profile" assessments are standardized across vendors, it behooves us to be cognizant of their limitations as primary variables used to guide implant selection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere1343
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open
Volume5
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017

Fingerprint

Breast
Cataloging
Breast Implants

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Making Sense of Implant "profile" in Breast Augmentation. / Wan, Dinah; Rohrich, Rod J.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open, Vol. 5, No. 5, e1343, 01.05.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1b3925d6202f451ea1d81de8860ddea2,
title = "Making Sense of Implant {"}profile{"} in Breast Augmentation",
abstract = "The increasing variety of breast implants has led to their classification into {"}profile{"} types to guide implant cataloguing and selection. Implant {"}profile{"} describes the overall silhouette of the implant. It represents a permutation of all 3 dimensions of the implant: Base diameter, projection, and volume. Implant {"}profile{"} is not the same as implant projection. Implant projection is a quantifiable linear measurement of the anterior-posterior dimension of the implant, whereas implant {"}profile{"} is a vendor-driven assessment that currently lacks universal standardization. Until {"}profile{"} assessments are standardized across vendors, it behooves us to be cognizant of their limitations as primary variables used to guide implant selection.",
author = "Dinah Wan and Rohrich, {Rod J.}",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/GOX.0000000000001343",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open",
issn = "2169-7574",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making Sense of Implant "profile" in Breast Augmentation

AU - Wan, Dinah

AU - Rohrich, Rod J.

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - The increasing variety of breast implants has led to their classification into "profile" types to guide implant cataloguing and selection. Implant "profile" describes the overall silhouette of the implant. It represents a permutation of all 3 dimensions of the implant: Base diameter, projection, and volume. Implant "profile" is not the same as implant projection. Implant projection is a quantifiable linear measurement of the anterior-posterior dimension of the implant, whereas implant "profile" is a vendor-driven assessment that currently lacks universal standardization. Until "profile" assessments are standardized across vendors, it behooves us to be cognizant of their limitations as primary variables used to guide implant selection.

AB - The increasing variety of breast implants has led to their classification into "profile" types to guide implant cataloguing and selection. Implant "profile" describes the overall silhouette of the implant. It represents a permutation of all 3 dimensions of the implant: Base diameter, projection, and volume. Implant "profile" is not the same as implant projection. Implant projection is a quantifiable linear measurement of the anterior-posterior dimension of the implant, whereas implant "profile" is a vendor-driven assessment that currently lacks universal standardization. Until "profile" assessments are standardized across vendors, it behooves us to be cognizant of their limitations as primary variables used to guide implant selection.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032483229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032483229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001343

DO - 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001343

M3 - Article

VL - 5

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open

SN - 2169-7574

IS - 5

M1 - e1343

ER -