Management of electrode exposure after cochlear implantation

Evan S. Walgama, Brandon Isaacson, J. Walter Kutz, Peter S. Roland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Exposure of a cochlear implant electrode array in the middle ear or external auditory canal is an uncommon complication. We report a series of 7 patients with electrode array exposure, 5 of whom were managed without surgical intervention. OBJECTIVE: To report the outcomes of patients with electrode array exposure after cochlear implantation. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Tertiary neurotology practice. PATIENTS: Patients with cochlear implant electrode exposure in the middle ear or external auditory canal. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Length of observation without deterioration of implant function and without complications. RESULTS: Five patients were managed without revision surgery. One patient presented with a poorly functioning implant, but after reprogramming, the implant returned to its baseline performance. Four other patients required no reprogramming and were managed medically without deterioration of implant function. Follow-up time was between 2 and 6 years. There were no serious complications in any patient related to their cochlear implant. CONCLUSION: Careful observation of patients with an exposed electrode array after cochlear implantation and a functioning implant seems to be a reasonable management option in select cases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1197-1200
Number of pages4
JournalOtology and Neurotology
Volume33
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

Cochlear Implantation
Electrodes
Cochlear Implants
Ear Canal
Middle Ear
Neurotology
Observation
Reoperation

Keywords

  • Cochlear implantation
  • Electrode array
  • Surgical complications

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Management of electrode exposure after cochlear implantation. / Walgama, Evan S.; Isaacson, Brandon; Kutz, J. Walter; Roland, Peter S.

In: Otology and Neurotology, Vol. 33, No. 7, 09.2012, p. 1197-1200.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Walgama, Evan S. ; Isaacson, Brandon ; Kutz, J. Walter ; Roland, Peter S. / Management of electrode exposure after cochlear implantation. In: Otology and Neurotology. 2012 ; Vol. 33, No. 7. pp. 1197-1200.
@article{bc01decfea86437e80a1eb44e2ed71d3,
title = "Management of electrode exposure after cochlear implantation",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Exposure of a cochlear implant electrode array in the middle ear or external auditory canal is an uncommon complication. We report a series of 7 patients with electrode array exposure, 5 of whom were managed without surgical intervention. OBJECTIVE: To report the outcomes of patients with electrode array exposure after cochlear implantation. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Tertiary neurotology practice. PATIENTS: Patients with cochlear implant electrode exposure in the middle ear or external auditory canal. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Length of observation without deterioration of implant function and without complications. RESULTS: Five patients were managed without revision surgery. One patient presented with a poorly functioning implant, but after reprogramming, the implant returned to its baseline performance. Four other patients required no reprogramming and were managed medically without deterioration of implant function. Follow-up time was between 2 and 6 years. There were no serious complications in any patient related to their cochlear implant. CONCLUSION: Careful observation of patients with an exposed electrode array after cochlear implantation and a functioning implant seems to be a reasonable management option in select cases.",
keywords = "Cochlear implantation, Electrode array, Surgical complications",
author = "Walgama, {Evan S.} and Brandon Isaacson and Kutz, {J. Walter} and Roland, {Peter S.}",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182659b05",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "1197--1200",
journal = "Otology and Neurotology",
issn = "1531-7129",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management of electrode exposure after cochlear implantation

AU - Walgama, Evan S.

AU - Isaacson, Brandon

AU - Kutz, J. Walter

AU - Roland, Peter S.

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - BACKGROUND: Exposure of a cochlear implant electrode array in the middle ear or external auditory canal is an uncommon complication. We report a series of 7 patients with electrode array exposure, 5 of whom were managed without surgical intervention. OBJECTIVE: To report the outcomes of patients with electrode array exposure after cochlear implantation. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Tertiary neurotology practice. PATIENTS: Patients with cochlear implant electrode exposure in the middle ear or external auditory canal. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Length of observation without deterioration of implant function and without complications. RESULTS: Five patients were managed without revision surgery. One patient presented with a poorly functioning implant, but after reprogramming, the implant returned to its baseline performance. Four other patients required no reprogramming and were managed medically without deterioration of implant function. Follow-up time was between 2 and 6 years. There were no serious complications in any patient related to their cochlear implant. CONCLUSION: Careful observation of patients with an exposed electrode array after cochlear implantation and a functioning implant seems to be a reasonable management option in select cases.

AB - BACKGROUND: Exposure of a cochlear implant electrode array in the middle ear or external auditory canal is an uncommon complication. We report a series of 7 patients with electrode array exposure, 5 of whom were managed without surgical intervention. OBJECTIVE: To report the outcomes of patients with electrode array exposure after cochlear implantation. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Tertiary neurotology practice. PATIENTS: Patients with cochlear implant electrode exposure in the middle ear or external auditory canal. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Length of observation without deterioration of implant function and without complications. RESULTS: Five patients were managed without revision surgery. One patient presented with a poorly functioning implant, but after reprogramming, the implant returned to its baseline performance. Four other patients required no reprogramming and were managed medically without deterioration of implant function. Follow-up time was between 2 and 6 years. There were no serious complications in any patient related to their cochlear implant. CONCLUSION: Careful observation of patients with an exposed electrode array after cochlear implantation and a functioning implant seems to be a reasonable management option in select cases.

KW - Cochlear implantation

KW - Electrode array

KW - Surgical complications

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865587765&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865587765&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182659b05

DO - 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182659b05

M3 - Article

C2 - 22892807

AN - SCOPUS:84865587765

VL - 33

SP - 1197

EP - 1200

JO - Otology and Neurotology

JF - Otology and Neurotology

SN - 1531-7129

IS - 7

ER -