Measurement of skeletal muscle area: Comparison of CT and MR imaging

Andrey Sinelnikov, Chuanxing Qu, David T. Fetzer, Jean Sébastien Pelletier, Michael A. Dunn, Allan Tsung, Alessandro Furlan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the intra- and inter-observer agreement and correlation between CT and MR measurements of skeletal muscle area (SMA) in the abdomen. Methods CT and MR images from twelve patients were analyzed by two blinded observers using segmentation software (MITK-3M3, Mint Medical and Slice-O-Matic, Tomovision) to quantify SMA. MR images included T1w “in-phase”, T1w “out-of-phase”, and T2w sequences. Inter- and intra-observer agreement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was used to correlate measurements obtained on MR with CT. CT and MR measurements were compared with Bland-Altman plots. Results Intra- and inter-observer agreement for SMA was high for CT and MR. For MR, the measurements on T2w images showed the highest inter-observer agreement (ICC = 0.96). CT SMA correlated closely with MR, with T2w images showing the highest correlation (r = 0.98; P < 0.01). Bland-Altman plots showed a 1.7%–3.9% bias between CT and MR measurements, lowest for T2w images. Conclusions MR SMA measurements are reproducible and correlate closely with CT. The T2w sequence is recommended to quantify SMA on MR images.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1716-1721
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Journal of Radiology
Volume85
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

Keywords

  • Image analysis
  • MR
  • Sarcopenia
  • Segmentation
  • Skeletal muscle area

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measurement of skeletal muscle area: Comparison of CT and MR imaging'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this