Measuring Clinical Information Technology in the ICU Setting

Application in a Quality Improvement Collaborative

Ruben Amarasingham, Peter J. Pronovost, Marie Diener-West, Christine Goeschel, Todd Dorman, David R. Thiemann, Neil R. Powe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Few instruments are available to measure the performance of intensive care unit (ICU) clinical information systems. Our objectives were: 1) to develop a survey-based metric that assesses the automation and usability of an ICU's clinical information system; 2) to determine whether higher scores on this instrument correlate with improved outcomes in a multi-institution quality improvement collaborative. Design: This is a cross-sectional study of the medical directors of 19 Michigan ICUs participating in a state-wide quality improvement collaborative designed to reduce the rate of catheter-related blood stream infections (CRBSI). Respondents completed a survey assessing their ICU's information systems. Measurements: The mean of 54 summed items on this instrument yields the clinical information technology (CIT) index, a global measure of the ICU's information system performance on a 100 point scale. The dependent variable in this study was the rate of CRBSI after the implementation of several evidence-based recommendations. A multivariable linear regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between the CIT score and the post-intervention CRBSI rates after adjustment for the pre-intervention rate. Results: In this cross-sectional analysis, we found that a 10 point increase in the CIT score is associated with 4.6 fewer catheter related infections per 1,000 central line days for ICUs who participate in the quality improvement intervention for 1 year (95% CI: 1.0 to 8.0). Conclusions: This study presents a new instrument to examine ICU information system effectiveness. The results suggest that the presence of more sophisticated information systems was associated with greater reductions in the bloodstream infection rate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)288-294
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2007

Fingerprint

Quality Improvement
Information Systems
Intensive Care Units
Technology
Catheters
Infection
Cross-Sectional Studies
Physician Executives
Catheter-Related Infections
Automation
Linear Models
Regression Analysis
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Amarasingham, R., Pronovost, P. J., Diener-West, M., Goeschel, C., Dorman, T., Thiemann, D. R., & Powe, N. R. (2007). Measuring Clinical Information Technology in the ICU Setting: Application in a Quality Improvement Collaborative. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 14(3), 288-294. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2262

Measuring Clinical Information Technology in the ICU Setting : Application in a Quality Improvement Collaborative. / Amarasingham, Ruben; Pronovost, Peter J.; Diener-West, Marie; Goeschel, Christine; Dorman, Todd; Thiemann, David R.; Powe, Neil R.

In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Vol. 14, No. 3, 05.2007, p. 288-294.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Amarasingham, R, Pronovost, PJ, Diener-West, M, Goeschel, C, Dorman, T, Thiemann, DR & Powe, NR 2007, 'Measuring Clinical Information Technology in the ICU Setting: Application in a Quality Improvement Collaborative', Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 288-294. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2262
Amarasingham, Ruben ; Pronovost, Peter J. ; Diener-West, Marie ; Goeschel, Christine ; Dorman, Todd ; Thiemann, David R. ; Powe, Neil R. / Measuring Clinical Information Technology in the ICU Setting : Application in a Quality Improvement Collaborative. In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2007 ; Vol. 14, No. 3. pp. 288-294.
@article{add45389432a440489d815bda8c05f06,
title = "Measuring Clinical Information Technology in the ICU Setting: Application in a Quality Improvement Collaborative",
abstract = "Objective: Few instruments are available to measure the performance of intensive care unit (ICU) clinical information systems. Our objectives were: 1) to develop a survey-based metric that assesses the automation and usability of an ICU's clinical information system; 2) to determine whether higher scores on this instrument correlate with improved outcomes in a multi-institution quality improvement collaborative. Design: This is a cross-sectional study of the medical directors of 19 Michigan ICUs participating in a state-wide quality improvement collaborative designed to reduce the rate of catheter-related blood stream infections (CRBSI). Respondents completed a survey assessing their ICU's information systems. Measurements: The mean of 54 summed items on this instrument yields the clinical information technology (CIT) index, a global measure of the ICU's information system performance on a 100 point scale. The dependent variable in this study was the rate of CRBSI after the implementation of several evidence-based recommendations. A multivariable linear regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between the CIT score and the post-intervention CRBSI rates after adjustment for the pre-intervention rate. Results: In this cross-sectional analysis, we found that a 10 point increase in the CIT score is associated with 4.6 fewer catheter related infections per 1,000 central line days for ICUs who participate in the quality improvement intervention for 1 year (95{\%} CI: 1.0 to 8.0). Conclusions: This study presents a new instrument to examine ICU information system effectiveness. The results suggest that the presence of more sophisticated information systems was associated with greater reductions in the bloodstream infection rate.",
author = "Ruben Amarasingham and Pronovost, {Peter J.} and Marie Diener-West and Christine Goeschel and Todd Dorman and Thiemann, {David R.} and Powe, {Neil R.}",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1197/jamia.M2262",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "288--294",
journal = "Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA",
issn = "1067-5027",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring Clinical Information Technology in the ICU Setting

T2 - Application in a Quality Improvement Collaborative

AU - Amarasingham, Ruben

AU - Pronovost, Peter J.

AU - Diener-West, Marie

AU - Goeschel, Christine

AU - Dorman, Todd

AU - Thiemann, David R.

AU - Powe, Neil R.

PY - 2007/5

Y1 - 2007/5

N2 - Objective: Few instruments are available to measure the performance of intensive care unit (ICU) clinical information systems. Our objectives were: 1) to develop a survey-based metric that assesses the automation and usability of an ICU's clinical information system; 2) to determine whether higher scores on this instrument correlate with improved outcomes in a multi-institution quality improvement collaborative. Design: This is a cross-sectional study of the medical directors of 19 Michigan ICUs participating in a state-wide quality improvement collaborative designed to reduce the rate of catheter-related blood stream infections (CRBSI). Respondents completed a survey assessing their ICU's information systems. Measurements: The mean of 54 summed items on this instrument yields the clinical information technology (CIT) index, a global measure of the ICU's information system performance on a 100 point scale. The dependent variable in this study was the rate of CRBSI after the implementation of several evidence-based recommendations. A multivariable linear regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between the CIT score and the post-intervention CRBSI rates after adjustment for the pre-intervention rate. Results: In this cross-sectional analysis, we found that a 10 point increase in the CIT score is associated with 4.6 fewer catheter related infections per 1,000 central line days for ICUs who participate in the quality improvement intervention for 1 year (95% CI: 1.0 to 8.0). Conclusions: This study presents a new instrument to examine ICU information system effectiveness. The results suggest that the presence of more sophisticated information systems was associated with greater reductions in the bloodstream infection rate.

AB - Objective: Few instruments are available to measure the performance of intensive care unit (ICU) clinical information systems. Our objectives were: 1) to develop a survey-based metric that assesses the automation and usability of an ICU's clinical information system; 2) to determine whether higher scores on this instrument correlate with improved outcomes in a multi-institution quality improvement collaborative. Design: This is a cross-sectional study of the medical directors of 19 Michigan ICUs participating in a state-wide quality improvement collaborative designed to reduce the rate of catheter-related blood stream infections (CRBSI). Respondents completed a survey assessing their ICU's information systems. Measurements: The mean of 54 summed items on this instrument yields the clinical information technology (CIT) index, a global measure of the ICU's information system performance on a 100 point scale. The dependent variable in this study was the rate of CRBSI after the implementation of several evidence-based recommendations. A multivariable linear regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between the CIT score and the post-intervention CRBSI rates after adjustment for the pre-intervention rate. Results: In this cross-sectional analysis, we found that a 10 point increase in the CIT score is associated with 4.6 fewer catheter related infections per 1,000 central line days for ICUs who participate in the quality improvement intervention for 1 year (95% CI: 1.0 to 8.0). Conclusions: This study presents a new instrument to examine ICU information system effectiveness. The results suggest that the presence of more sophisticated information systems was associated with greater reductions in the bloodstream infection rate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247346970&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247346970&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1197/jamia.M2262

DO - 10.1197/jamia.M2262

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 288

EP - 294

JO - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

JF - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

SN - 1067-5027

IS - 3

ER -