Measuring Diversity and Inclusion in Academic Medicine: The Diversity Engagement Survey

Sharina D. Person, C. Greer Jordan, Jeroan J. Allison, Lisa M. Fink Ogawa, Laura Castillo-Page, Sarah Conrad, Marc A. Nivet, Deborah L. Plummer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose To produce a physician and scientific workforce that advances high-quality research and culturally competent care, academic medical centers (AMCs) must assess their capacity for diversity and inclusion and leverage opportunities for improvement. The Diversity Engagement Survey (DES) is presented as a diagnostic and benchmarking tool. Method The 22-item DES consists of eight factors that connect engagement theory to inclusion and diversity constructs. It was piloted at 1 AMC and then administered at 13 additional U.S. AMCs in 2011-2012. Face and content validity were assessed through a review panel. Cronbach alpha was used to assess internal consistency. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to establish construct validity. Cluster analysis was conducted to establish ability of the DES to distinguish between institutions' degrees of engagement and inclusion. Criterion validity was established using observed differences in scores for demographic groups as suggested by the literature. Results The sample included 13,694 respondents across 14 AMCs. Cronbach alphas for the engagement and inclusion factors (range: 0.68-0.85), CFA fit indices, and item correlations with latent constructs indicated an acceptable model fit and that items measured the intended concepts. Cluster analysis of DES scores distinguished institutions with higher, middle, and lower degrees of engagement and inclusion by their respondents. Consistent with the literature, black, Hispanic/Latino, female, and LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer) respondents reported lower degrees of engagement than their counterparts. Conclusions The DES is a reliable and valid instrument for assessment, evaluation, and external benchmarking of institutional engagement and inclusion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1675-1683
Number of pages9
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume90
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

inclusion
medicine
benchmarking
cluster analysis
factor analysis
construct validity
diagnostic
physician
ability
evaluation
Group
literature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Person, S. D., Jordan, C. G., Allison, J. J., Fink Ogawa, L. M., Castillo-Page, L., Conrad, S., ... Plummer, D. L. (2015). Measuring Diversity and Inclusion in Academic Medicine: The Diversity Engagement Survey. Academic Medicine, 90(12), 1675-1683. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000921

Measuring Diversity and Inclusion in Academic Medicine : The Diversity Engagement Survey. / Person, Sharina D.; Jordan, C. Greer; Allison, Jeroan J.; Fink Ogawa, Lisa M.; Castillo-Page, Laura; Conrad, Sarah; Nivet, Marc A.; Plummer, Deborah L.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 90, No. 12, 01.12.2015, p. 1675-1683.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Person, SD, Jordan, CG, Allison, JJ, Fink Ogawa, LM, Castillo-Page, L, Conrad, S, Nivet, MA & Plummer, DL 2015, 'Measuring Diversity and Inclusion in Academic Medicine: The Diversity Engagement Survey', Academic Medicine, vol. 90, no. 12, pp. 1675-1683. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000921
Person SD, Jordan CG, Allison JJ, Fink Ogawa LM, Castillo-Page L, Conrad S et al. Measuring Diversity and Inclusion in Academic Medicine: The Diversity Engagement Survey. Academic Medicine. 2015 Dec 1;90(12):1675-1683. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000921
Person, Sharina D. ; Jordan, C. Greer ; Allison, Jeroan J. ; Fink Ogawa, Lisa M. ; Castillo-Page, Laura ; Conrad, Sarah ; Nivet, Marc A. ; Plummer, Deborah L. / Measuring Diversity and Inclusion in Academic Medicine : The Diversity Engagement Survey. In: Academic Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 90, No. 12. pp. 1675-1683.
@article{df1e55d1d7f54344be6634d76a5633d6,
title = "Measuring Diversity and Inclusion in Academic Medicine: The Diversity Engagement Survey",
abstract = "Purpose To produce a physician and scientific workforce that advances high-quality research and culturally competent care, academic medical centers (AMCs) must assess their capacity for diversity and inclusion and leverage opportunities for improvement. The Diversity Engagement Survey (DES) is presented as a diagnostic and benchmarking tool. Method The 22-item DES consists of eight factors that connect engagement theory to inclusion and diversity constructs. It was piloted at 1 AMC and then administered at 13 additional U.S. AMCs in 2011-2012. Face and content validity were assessed through a review panel. Cronbach alpha was used to assess internal consistency. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to establish construct validity. Cluster analysis was conducted to establish ability of the DES to distinguish between institutions' degrees of engagement and inclusion. Criterion validity was established using observed differences in scores for demographic groups as suggested by the literature. Results The sample included 13,694 respondents across 14 AMCs. Cronbach alphas for the engagement and inclusion factors (range: 0.68-0.85), CFA fit indices, and item correlations with latent constructs indicated an acceptable model fit and that items measured the intended concepts. Cluster analysis of DES scores distinguished institutions with higher, middle, and lower degrees of engagement and inclusion by their respondents. Consistent with the literature, black, Hispanic/Latino, female, and LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer) respondents reported lower degrees of engagement than their counterparts. Conclusions The DES is a reliable and valid instrument for assessment, evaluation, and external benchmarking of institutional engagement and inclusion.",
author = "Person, {Sharina D.} and Jordan, {C. Greer} and Allison, {Jeroan J.} and {Fink Ogawa}, {Lisa M.} and Laura Castillo-Page and Sarah Conrad and Nivet, {Marc A.} and Plummer, {Deborah L.}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0000000000000921",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "90",
pages = "1675--1683",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring Diversity and Inclusion in Academic Medicine

T2 - The Diversity Engagement Survey

AU - Person, Sharina D.

AU - Jordan, C. Greer

AU - Allison, Jeroan J.

AU - Fink Ogawa, Lisa M.

AU - Castillo-Page, Laura

AU - Conrad, Sarah

AU - Nivet, Marc A.

AU - Plummer, Deborah L.

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Purpose To produce a physician and scientific workforce that advances high-quality research and culturally competent care, academic medical centers (AMCs) must assess their capacity for diversity and inclusion and leverage opportunities for improvement. The Diversity Engagement Survey (DES) is presented as a diagnostic and benchmarking tool. Method The 22-item DES consists of eight factors that connect engagement theory to inclusion and diversity constructs. It was piloted at 1 AMC and then administered at 13 additional U.S. AMCs in 2011-2012. Face and content validity were assessed through a review panel. Cronbach alpha was used to assess internal consistency. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to establish construct validity. Cluster analysis was conducted to establish ability of the DES to distinguish between institutions' degrees of engagement and inclusion. Criterion validity was established using observed differences in scores for demographic groups as suggested by the literature. Results The sample included 13,694 respondents across 14 AMCs. Cronbach alphas for the engagement and inclusion factors (range: 0.68-0.85), CFA fit indices, and item correlations with latent constructs indicated an acceptable model fit and that items measured the intended concepts. Cluster analysis of DES scores distinguished institutions with higher, middle, and lower degrees of engagement and inclusion by their respondents. Consistent with the literature, black, Hispanic/Latino, female, and LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer) respondents reported lower degrees of engagement than their counterparts. Conclusions The DES is a reliable and valid instrument for assessment, evaluation, and external benchmarking of institutional engagement and inclusion.

AB - Purpose To produce a physician and scientific workforce that advances high-quality research and culturally competent care, academic medical centers (AMCs) must assess their capacity for diversity and inclusion and leverage opportunities for improvement. The Diversity Engagement Survey (DES) is presented as a diagnostic and benchmarking tool. Method The 22-item DES consists of eight factors that connect engagement theory to inclusion and diversity constructs. It was piloted at 1 AMC and then administered at 13 additional U.S. AMCs in 2011-2012. Face and content validity were assessed through a review panel. Cronbach alpha was used to assess internal consistency. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to establish construct validity. Cluster analysis was conducted to establish ability of the DES to distinguish between institutions' degrees of engagement and inclusion. Criterion validity was established using observed differences in scores for demographic groups as suggested by the literature. Results The sample included 13,694 respondents across 14 AMCs. Cronbach alphas for the engagement and inclusion factors (range: 0.68-0.85), CFA fit indices, and item correlations with latent constructs indicated an acceptable model fit and that items measured the intended concepts. Cluster analysis of DES scores distinguished institutions with higher, middle, and lower degrees of engagement and inclusion by their respondents. Consistent with the literature, black, Hispanic/Latino, female, and LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer) respondents reported lower degrees of engagement than their counterparts. Conclusions The DES is a reliable and valid instrument for assessment, evaluation, and external benchmarking of institutional engagement and inclusion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948387048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84948387048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000921

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000921

M3 - Article

C2 - 26466376

AN - SCOPUS:84948387048

VL - 90

SP - 1675

EP - 1683

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 12

ER -