Mechanical devices for cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The most current practice guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation published by the American Heart Association and European Resuscitation Council have placed the highest priority on achieving the most optimal circulation possible following sudden cardiac arrest through the delivery of early, consistent, high-quality and infrequently interrupted chest compressions during resuscitative efforts. The purpose of this review is to analyze the most recent trials involving adjunct mechanical devices designed to optimize blood flow to vital organs during cardiopulmonary resuscitation conditions. RECENT FINDINGS: Six devices show substantial promise based on the compelling results of numerous animal and small-scale clinical trials. All of these promising interventions, however, have yet to be validated in definitive clinical trials, particularly those examining long-term survival and neurological function. SUMMARY: Markedly enhanced circulation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation efforts has been found to be a critical element for effecting successful resuscitation. Preliminary studies of adjunct mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation devices have revealed significant increases in improved hemodynamics in both animal models and human studies, as well as improvements in short-term human survival in the clinical setting. Several of these devices are currently undergoing definitive clinical trials that hopefully will establish irrefutable efficacy and improved long-term neurological outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)273-279
Number of pages7
JournalCurrent Opinion in Critical Care
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2007

Fingerprint

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Equipment and Supplies
Clinical Trials
Survival
Sudden Cardiac Death
Practice Guidelines
Resuscitation
Thorax
Animal Models
Hemodynamics

Keywords

  • Cardiac arrest
  • Cardiopulmonary arrest
  • Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
  • Chest compressions
  • Mechanical medical devices
  • Resuscitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Mechanical devices for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. / Wigginton, Jane G.; Isaacs, S. Marshal; Kay, Joseph J.

In: Current Opinion in Critical Care, Vol. 13, No. 3, 06.2007, p. 273-279.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5842983818d443e096e0e022181bdd99,
title = "Mechanical devices for cardiopulmonary resuscitation",
abstract = "PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The most current practice guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation published by the American Heart Association and European Resuscitation Council have placed the highest priority on achieving the most optimal circulation possible following sudden cardiac arrest through the delivery of early, consistent, high-quality and infrequently interrupted chest compressions during resuscitative efforts. The purpose of this review is to analyze the most recent trials involving adjunct mechanical devices designed to optimize blood flow to vital organs during cardiopulmonary resuscitation conditions. RECENT FINDINGS: Six devices show substantial promise based on the compelling results of numerous animal and small-scale clinical trials. All of these promising interventions, however, have yet to be validated in definitive clinical trials, particularly those examining long-term survival and neurological function. SUMMARY: Markedly enhanced circulation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation efforts has been found to be a critical element for effecting successful resuscitation. Preliminary studies of adjunct mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation devices have revealed significant increases in improved hemodynamics in both animal models and human studies, as well as improvements in short-term human survival in the clinical setting. Several of these devices are currently undergoing definitive clinical trials that hopefully will establish irrefutable efficacy and improved long-term neurological outcomes.",
keywords = "Cardiac arrest, Cardiopulmonary arrest, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Chest compressions, Mechanical medical devices, Resuscitation",
author = "Wigginton, {Jane G.} and Isaacs, {S. Marshal} and Kay, {Joseph J.}",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1097/MCC.0b013e328155d4ab",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "273--279",
journal = "Current Opinion in Critical Care",
issn = "1070-5295",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mechanical devices for cardiopulmonary resuscitation

AU - Wigginton, Jane G.

AU - Isaacs, S. Marshal

AU - Kay, Joseph J.

PY - 2007/6

Y1 - 2007/6

N2 - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The most current practice guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation published by the American Heart Association and European Resuscitation Council have placed the highest priority on achieving the most optimal circulation possible following sudden cardiac arrest through the delivery of early, consistent, high-quality and infrequently interrupted chest compressions during resuscitative efforts. The purpose of this review is to analyze the most recent trials involving adjunct mechanical devices designed to optimize blood flow to vital organs during cardiopulmonary resuscitation conditions. RECENT FINDINGS: Six devices show substantial promise based on the compelling results of numerous animal and small-scale clinical trials. All of these promising interventions, however, have yet to be validated in definitive clinical trials, particularly those examining long-term survival and neurological function. SUMMARY: Markedly enhanced circulation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation efforts has been found to be a critical element for effecting successful resuscitation. Preliminary studies of adjunct mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation devices have revealed significant increases in improved hemodynamics in both animal models and human studies, as well as improvements in short-term human survival in the clinical setting. Several of these devices are currently undergoing definitive clinical trials that hopefully will establish irrefutable efficacy and improved long-term neurological outcomes.

AB - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The most current practice guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation published by the American Heart Association and European Resuscitation Council have placed the highest priority on achieving the most optimal circulation possible following sudden cardiac arrest through the delivery of early, consistent, high-quality and infrequently interrupted chest compressions during resuscitative efforts. The purpose of this review is to analyze the most recent trials involving adjunct mechanical devices designed to optimize blood flow to vital organs during cardiopulmonary resuscitation conditions. RECENT FINDINGS: Six devices show substantial promise based on the compelling results of numerous animal and small-scale clinical trials. All of these promising interventions, however, have yet to be validated in definitive clinical trials, particularly those examining long-term survival and neurological function. SUMMARY: Markedly enhanced circulation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation efforts has been found to be a critical element for effecting successful resuscitation. Preliminary studies of adjunct mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation devices have revealed significant increases in improved hemodynamics in both animal models and human studies, as well as improvements in short-term human survival in the clinical setting. Several of these devices are currently undergoing definitive clinical trials that hopefully will establish irrefutable efficacy and improved long-term neurological outcomes.

KW - Cardiac arrest

KW - Cardiopulmonary arrest

KW - Cardiopulmonary resuscitation

KW - Chest compressions

KW - Mechanical medical devices

KW - Resuscitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249003050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249003050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MCC.0b013e328155d4ab

DO - 10.1097/MCC.0b013e328155d4ab

M3 - Article

C2 - 17468558

AN - SCOPUS:34249003050

VL - 13

SP - 273

EP - 279

JO - Current Opinion in Critical Care

JF - Current Opinion in Critical Care

SN - 1070-5295

IS - 3

ER -