Mechanically assisted, delayed primary closure of diabetic foot wounds

David G. Armstrong, Lawrence A. Lavery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors evaluated the time to healing and prevalence of complications in patients undergoing mechanically assisted, delayed primary closure of diabetic foot wounds compared with a similar population who received standard wound care. A total of 55 patients were enrolled for study, with 25 in the experimental group and 30 in the control group. Patients in the experimental (stretch) group underwent mechanically assisted primary closure of their wounds using a skin-stretching device. There was no difference between the stretch and control groups with regard to any descriptive characteristics, including wound chronicity. Although the wounds were over three times as large on average in the stretch group (P < .001), the stretch group reached full epithelialization approximately 40% sooner than the control group (26.4 ± 16.0 versus 42.5 ± 19.9 days; P < .002). Eighty-eight percent of patients in the stretch group experienced wound dehiscence, at a mean time of 1.8 ± 0.6 weeks following mechanically assisted closure. However, patients who experienced dehiscence in the stretch group healed significantly faster than patients in the control group (27.4 ± 16.7 versus 42.5 ± 19.9 days; P < .007). The results of this study suggest that mechanically assisted closure of diabetic foot wounds may result in reduced healing time compared with healing by secondary intention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)483-488
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Podiatric Medical Association
Volume88
Issue number10
StatePublished - Oct 1998

Fingerprint

Diabetic Foot
Wounds and Injuries
Control Groups
Equipment and Supplies
Skin
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Mechanically assisted, delayed primary closure of diabetic foot wounds. / Armstrong, David G.; Lavery, Lawrence A.

In: Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, Vol. 88, No. 10, 10.1998, p. 483-488.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6cb48e34620e4550a74216c4be498962,
title = "Mechanically assisted, delayed primary closure of diabetic foot wounds",
abstract = "The authors evaluated the time to healing and prevalence of complications in patients undergoing mechanically assisted, delayed primary closure of diabetic foot wounds compared with a similar population who received standard wound care. A total of 55 patients were enrolled for study, with 25 in the experimental group and 30 in the control group. Patients in the experimental (stretch) group underwent mechanically assisted primary closure of their wounds using a skin-stretching device. There was no difference between the stretch and control groups with regard to any descriptive characteristics, including wound chronicity. Although the wounds were over three times as large on average in the stretch group (P < .001), the stretch group reached full epithelialization approximately 40{\%} sooner than the control group (26.4 ± 16.0 versus 42.5 ± 19.9 days; P < .002). Eighty-eight percent of patients in the stretch group experienced wound dehiscence, at a mean time of 1.8 ± 0.6 weeks following mechanically assisted closure. However, patients who experienced dehiscence in the stretch group healed significantly faster than patients in the control group (27.4 ± 16.7 versus 42.5 ± 19.9 days; P < .007). The results of this study suggest that mechanically assisted closure of diabetic foot wounds may result in reduced healing time compared with healing by secondary intention.",
author = "Armstrong, {David G.} and Lavery, {Lawrence A.}",
year = "1998",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
pages = "483--488",
journal = "Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association",
issn = "8750-7315",
publisher = "American Podiatric Medical Association",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mechanically assisted, delayed primary closure of diabetic foot wounds

AU - Armstrong, David G.

AU - Lavery, Lawrence A.

PY - 1998/10

Y1 - 1998/10

N2 - The authors evaluated the time to healing and prevalence of complications in patients undergoing mechanically assisted, delayed primary closure of diabetic foot wounds compared with a similar population who received standard wound care. A total of 55 patients were enrolled for study, with 25 in the experimental group and 30 in the control group. Patients in the experimental (stretch) group underwent mechanically assisted primary closure of their wounds using a skin-stretching device. There was no difference between the stretch and control groups with regard to any descriptive characteristics, including wound chronicity. Although the wounds were over three times as large on average in the stretch group (P < .001), the stretch group reached full epithelialization approximately 40% sooner than the control group (26.4 ± 16.0 versus 42.5 ± 19.9 days; P < .002). Eighty-eight percent of patients in the stretch group experienced wound dehiscence, at a mean time of 1.8 ± 0.6 weeks following mechanically assisted closure. However, patients who experienced dehiscence in the stretch group healed significantly faster than patients in the control group (27.4 ± 16.7 versus 42.5 ± 19.9 days; P < .007). The results of this study suggest that mechanically assisted closure of diabetic foot wounds may result in reduced healing time compared with healing by secondary intention.

AB - The authors evaluated the time to healing and prevalence of complications in patients undergoing mechanically assisted, delayed primary closure of diabetic foot wounds compared with a similar population who received standard wound care. A total of 55 patients were enrolled for study, with 25 in the experimental group and 30 in the control group. Patients in the experimental (stretch) group underwent mechanically assisted primary closure of their wounds using a skin-stretching device. There was no difference between the stretch and control groups with regard to any descriptive characteristics, including wound chronicity. Although the wounds were over three times as large on average in the stretch group (P < .001), the stretch group reached full epithelialization approximately 40% sooner than the control group (26.4 ± 16.0 versus 42.5 ± 19.9 days; P < .002). Eighty-eight percent of patients in the stretch group experienced wound dehiscence, at a mean time of 1.8 ± 0.6 weeks following mechanically assisted closure. However, patients who experienced dehiscence in the stretch group healed significantly faster than patients in the control group (27.4 ± 16.7 versus 42.5 ± 19.9 days; P < .007). The results of this study suggest that mechanically assisted closure of diabetic foot wounds may result in reduced healing time compared with healing by secondary intention.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032185425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032185425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9791952

AN - SCOPUS:0032185425

VL - 88

SP - 483

EP - 488

JO - Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association

JF - Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association

SN - 8750-7315

IS - 10

ER -