Mesh migration following abdominal hernia repair

a comprehensive review

H. B. Cunningham, J. J. Weis, L. R. Taveras, Sergio Huerta

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This study reviewed the literature regarding mesh migration in abdominal hernia repair. The aim of this study is to interrogate incidence, common type of abdominal hernia repair leading to migration, patterns of mesh migration, and materials associated with migration. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted. PubMed and MEDLINE were searched for relevant articles in the English literature. We employed Ovid syntax from 1949 to January 2010, the Cochrane Library, Google and Google Scholar. The clinical trial database Clinicaltrials.gov was reviewed. Letters to the editor were reviewed to extract cross-references. Multiple keywords were used alone and in combination to extract all relevant articles. Results: In total, 287 unique English citations were reviewed. Of these, 84 articles were selected and consisted of 3 case series, 77 case reports, 2 literature reviews, 1 retrospective study, and 1 prospective, observational study. In an analysis of available cases, the average age was 59.8 ± 13.8 years with a male predominance (76.2%). The index hernia repair was inguinal in 62.9%, incisional/ventral in 28.1%, umbilical in 6.7%, and other in 2.2%. Within the inguinal hernia group, 51.8% were open repairs, 42.9% were laparoscopic, and 1.8% were robotic. Implicated mesh materials included polypropylene, PTFE, and composite mesh. Migration commonly affected multiple organs (31.5%). Conclusions: It is likely that more cases of mesh migration will appear in the literature. Reports are heterogeneous and highlight the diversity of this complication. A standardized method of reporting is needed to develop guidelines and recommendations for this presentation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)235-243
Number of pages9
JournalHernia
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Abdominal Hernia
Herniorrhaphy
Literature
Umbilicus
Groin
Polypropylenes
Inguinal Hernia
Polytetrafluoroethylene
Robotics
PubMed
MEDLINE
Libraries
Observational Studies
Retrospective Studies
Clinical Trials
Databases
Prospective Studies
Guidelines
Incidence

Keywords

  • Hernia repair
  • Lichtenstein repair
  • Mesh complications
  • Mesh erosion
  • Mesh migration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Mesh migration following abdominal hernia repair : a comprehensive review. / Cunningham, H. B.; Weis, J. J.; Taveras, L. R.; Huerta, Sergio.

In: Hernia, Vol. 23, No. 2, 01.04.2019, p. 235-243.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Cunningham, H. B. ; Weis, J. J. ; Taveras, L. R. ; Huerta, Sergio. / Mesh migration following abdominal hernia repair : a comprehensive review. In: Hernia. 2019 ; Vol. 23, No. 2. pp. 235-243.
@article{5de219f9dd3d4fe7b29d6626758d0284,
title = "Mesh migration following abdominal hernia repair: a comprehensive review",
abstract = "Purpose: This study reviewed the literature regarding mesh migration in abdominal hernia repair. The aim of this study is to interrogate incidence, common type of abdominal hernia repair leading to migration, patterns of mesh migration, and materials associated with migration. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted. PubMed and MEDLINE were searched for relevant articles in the English literature. We employed Ovid syntax from 1949 to January 2010, the Cochrane Library, Google and Google Scholar. The clinical trial database Clinicaltrials.gov was reviewed. Letters to the editor were reviewed to extract cross-references. Multiple keywords were used alone and in combination to extract all relevant articles. Results: In total, 287 unique English citations were reviewed. Of these, 84 articles were selected and consisted of 3 case series, 77 case reports, 2 literature reviews, 1 retrospective study, and 1 prospective, observational study. In an analysis of available cases, the average age was 59.8 ± 13.8 years with a male predominance (76.2{\%}). The index hernia repair was inguinal in 62.9{\%}, incisional/ventral in 28.1{\%}, umbilical in 6.7{\%}, and other in 2.2{\%}. Within the inguinal hernia group, 51.8{\%} were open repairs, 42.9{\%} were laparoscopic, and 1.8{\%} were robotic. Implicated mesh materials included polypropylene, PTFE, and composite mesh. Migration commonly affected multiple organs (31.5{\%}). Conclusions: It is likely that more cases of mesh migration will appear in the literature. Reports are heterogeneous and highlight the diversity of this complication. A standardized method of reporting is needed to develop guidelines and recommendations for this presentation.",
keywords = "Hernia repair, Lichtenstein repair, Mesh complications, Mesh erosion, Mesh migration",
author = "Cunningham, {H. B.} and Weis, {J. J.} and Taveras, {L. R.} and Sergio Huerta",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10029-019-01898-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "235--243",
journal = "Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery",
issn = "1265-4906",
publisher = "Springer Paris",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mesh migration following abdominal hernia repair

T2 - a comprehensive review

AU - Cunningham, H. B.

AU - Weis, J. J.

AU - Taveras, L. R.

AU - Huerta, Sergio

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Purpose: This study reviewed the literature regarding mesh migration in abdominal hernia repair. The aim of this study is to interrogate incidence, common type of abdominal hernia repair leading to migration, patterns of mesh migration, and materials associated with migration. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted. PubMed and MEDLINE were searched for relevant articles in the English literature. We employed Ovid syntax from 1949 to January 2010, the Cochrane Library, Google and Google Scholar. The clinical trial database Clinicaltrials.gov was reviewed. Letters to the editor were reviewed to extract cross-references. Multiple keywords were used alone and in combination to extract all relevant articles. Results: In total, 287 unique English citations were reviewed. Of these, 84 articles were selected and consisted of 3 case series, 77 case reports, 2 literature reviews, 1 retrospective study, and 1 prospective, observational study. In an analysis of available cases, the average age was 59.8 ± 13.8 years with a male predominance (76.2%). The index hernia repair was inguinal in 62.9%, incisional/ventral in 28.1%, umbilical in 6.7%, and other in 2.2%. Within the inguinal hernia group, 51.8% were open repairs, 42.9% were laparoscopic, and 1.8% were robotic. Implicated mesh materials included polypropylene, PTFE, and composite mesh. Migration commonly affected multiple organs (31.5%). Conclusions: It is likely that more cases of mesh migration will appear in the literature. Reports are heterogeneous and highlight the diversity of this complication. A standardized method of reporting is needed to develop guidelines and recommendations for this presentation.

AB - Purpose: This study reviewed the literature regarding mesh migration in abdominal hernia repair. The aim of this study is to interrogate incidence, common type of abdominal hernia repair leading to migration, patterns of mesh migration, and materials associated with migration. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted. PubMed and MEDLINE were searched for relevant articles in the English literature. We employed Ovid syntax from 1949 to January 2010, the Cochrane Library, Google and Google Scholar. The clinical trial database Clinicaltrials.gov was reviewed. Letters to the editor were reviewed to extract cross-references. Multiple keywords were used alone and in combination to extract all relevant articles. Results: In total, 287 unique English citations were reviewed. Of these, 84 articles were selected and consisted of 3 case series, 77 case reports, 2 literature reviews, 1 retrospective study, and 1 prospective, observational study. In an analysis of available cases, the average age was 59.8 ± 13.8 years with a male predominance (76.2%). The index hernia repair was inguinal in 62.9%, incisional/ventral in 28.1%, umbilical in 6.7%, and other in 2.2%. Within the inguinal hernia group, 51.8% were open repairs, 42.9% were laparoscopic, and 1.8% were robotic. Implicated mesh materials included polypropylene, PTFE, and composite mesh. Migration commonly affected multiple organs (31.5%). Conclusions: It is likely that more cases of mesh migration will appear in the literature. Reports are heterogeneous and highlight the diversity of this complication. A standardized method of reporting is needed to develop guidelines and recommendations for this presentation.

KW - Hernia repair

KW - Lichtenstein repair

KW - Mesh complications

KW - Mesh erosion

KW - Mesh migration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064179534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064179534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10029-019-01898-9

DO - 10.1007/s10029-019-01898-9

M3 - Review article

VL - 23

SP - 235

EP - 243

JO - Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery

JF - Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery

SN - 1265-4906

IS - 2

ER -